Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

[NEOPARADIGM]

The matchmaking/no lobby thing this game has going on is clearly a weak spot.

Every game should have a setup like Killzone 2's where guys can host their own games, choose the maps and gamemodes, ban weapons, etc., and then guys can join or not based on those settings.

I also don't like how I have to find a new game if I want to play Conquest; there should be games where it rotates: Rush offense, Conquest, Rush defense; map changes: Rush offense, Conquest, Rush defense.

[Jistic]

I hate Laguna Presa. That could change, but I played 6 times on it last night and hated every game. It's way too wide open. Defense doesn't stand a chance.

[BroMontana82]

Quote: Originally Posted by mattlanta

Do we have some sort of squad going within us OS'ers? I only have one friend who has this game, and it's not really fun playing with random squad members because it seems like I always end up with the ****tiest bunch.

360? if so add me: menthemaster

Quote: Originally Posted by AtomicLegend

Ok is just me, or does every single game I go into have less that 12 people? I was playing with a friend and it was a 6 v 5 game... new game roughly around 7 v 5.... is it the matchmaking? This was the first time I played this game for around 2-3 weeks, hopefully this game isn't dead already...

yeah happened to me too...weird.

[SinisterAlex]

BF:BC1 games were ALWAYS full even a year or two after it's release, so it has to be matchmaking/ server issues.... lame.

I think I'm done with Rush.... every game I go into is a freaking "lets spawn kill the attackers at their spawn" so annoying...

[NEOPARADIGM]

Quote: Originally Posted by AtomicLegend

I think I'm done with Rush.... every game I go into is a freaking "lets spawn kill the attackers at their spawn" so annoying...

I haven't played in a few days, but that was happening to me last game I played, like really bad, to the point where we lost the match in like 10 minutes, and even guys on my squad who are normally really good were finishing like 4-17 (I went 1-14 myself).

I don't know the names of the maps, but I swear there was literally no way out: you'd spawn and - bam! - chokepoint with 6 enemies and a tank.

It's not even the "sore loser" thing - I can still have fun while getting my clock cleaned - it's just stupid if you can't even take cover or hit up an escape route. I'd just as soon not spawn at all.

[ExtremeGamer]

I haven't played Rush since the first week, hated it back then as well.

Still love Conquest, played for awhile last night, the new map is fun, but vehicle-less (unless I completely missed them somewhere). Ruins the flow a little not having any tanks at least.

I had an awesome (for me) 4300 point game last night, 24 kills, a bunch of revives and repairs, then using C4 blew up 5 tanks with at least 2 guys inside each time. I normally change class each spawn (no clue why). Had a blast.

[iAM-IncReDiBLe-]

Quote: Originally Posted by mattlanta

Do we have some sort of squad going within us OS'ers? I only have one friend who has this game, and it's not really fun playing with random squad members because it seems like I always end up with the ****tiest bunch.

If it's ps3 send me a friend request. psn = kng23rich

[Jistic]

Quote: Originally Posted by AtomicLegend

BF:BC1 games were ALWAYS full even a year or two after it's release, so it has to be matchmaking/ server issues.... lame. I think I'm done with Rush.... every game I go into is a freaking "lets spawn kill the attackers at their spawn" so annoying...

I get that every once in awhile. Just make sure to spawn on your squad mates.

To me Rush is still way the best game on here. Every time we try Conquest we're like "Yawn." On the old BF2 games with 64 person multiplayer it rocked, but with 12? Not a fan.