Home

Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

This is a discussion on Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced within the Non-Sports Gaming forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Other > Non-Sports Gaming
Sports Game of the Year in 2020: MLB The Show 20
Best Racing Game in 2020: F1 2020
Best Franchise Mode in 2020: Super Mega Baseball 3
Poll: What's more important to you, when the time comes to purchase a game? (Click to vote)
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-31-2010, 12:13 PM   #2401
Cold & Cocky
 
frostbyte06's Arena
 
OVR: 13
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 1,220
Re: Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jistic
I get that every once in awhile. Just make sure to spawn on your squad mates.

To me Rush is still way the best game on here. Every time we try Conquest we're like "Yawn." On the old BF2 games with 64 person multiplayer it rocked, but with 12? Not a fan.
Agreed on the Conquest thing, I've tried it several times with friends and it seems as though we spend the majority of the time just trying to find somebody.
frostbyte06 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 03-31-2010, 12:15 PM   #2402
Hall Of Fame
 
Jistic's Arena
 
OVR: 28
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, ILL
Posts: 16,404
Re: Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

Laguna is easy enough for the attackers. Now they got a sound bug on the map. When attackers arm, defenders can't hear the alarm. Another one after you disarm, the alarm still goes.





__________________
PSN: JISTIC_OS
XBOX LIVE: JISTIC

Jistic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 12:26 PM   #2403
Canadian eh?
 
SinisterAlex's Arena
 
OVR: 24
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,550
Re: Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jistic
I get that every once in awhile. Just make sure to spawn on your squad mates.

To me Rush is still way the best game on here. Every time we try Conquest we're like "Yawn." On the old BF2 games with 64 person multiplayer it rocked, but with 12? Not a fan.
What if you squad mates suck xD Literally they kept dying and acting like idiots and I had to spawn on the base.... so dumb.... gotta get some OS'ers to play with again xD
__________________
Xbox LIVE GT: oALEXtheGREATo
PSN ID: oALEXtheGREATo
SinisterAlex is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 12:27 PM   #2404
Hall Of Fame
 
Jistic's Arena
 
OVR: 28
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, ILL
Posts: 16,404
Re: Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicLegend
What if you squad mates suck xD Literally they kept dying and acting like idiots and I had to spawn on the base.... so dumb.... gotta get some OS'ers to play with again xD
If it was that bad, I'd just quit. Then join a new game. Problem solved.

When you get a good server Rush kicks ***.
__________________
PSN: JISTIC_OS
XBOX LIVE: JISTIC

Jistic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 01:04 PM   #2405
Be Massive
 
sportsdude's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,000
Re: Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

I played Laguna Presa on rush last night and the very first time ran into that sound bug that Jistic mentioned above. Did not really like the conversion of Laguna Presa into a rush map, it seems like it's way too easy to attack and difficult to defend. The third and fourth set of m-coms are pretty much right next to each other and that's a pain. Maybe it will grow on me but right now it's my least favorite rush map.

I would rank my favorite rush maps like this:

1. Arica Harbor
2. Valparaiso
3. Port Valdez
4. Isla Inocentes
5. Nelson Bay
6. Laguna Presa
__________________
Lux y Veritas
sportsdude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 03-31-2010, 02:21 PM   #2406
Hall Of Fame
 
Jistic's Arena
 
OVR: 28
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, ILL
Posts: 16,404
Re: Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportsdude
I would rank my favorite rush maps like this:

1. Arica Harbor
2. Valparaiso
3. Port Valdez
4. Isla Inocentes
5. Nelson Bay
6. Laguna Presa
I would go.

1. Arica
2. Isla Inocentes
3. Valporaiso
4. Nelson Bay
5. Port Valdez
6. Laguna Presa

Presa needs a lot of work if it's gonna be a competitive map.

Valdez I think I'm just burned out on from the demo days. Nelson Bay I hated but lately is growing on me. My top 3 are almost a dead even to me. I just love desert maps though. Arica feels like a journey cuz it's varied.
__________________
PSN: JISTIC_OS
XBOX LIVE: JISTIC

Jistic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 02:46 PM   #2407
Be Massive
 
sportsdude's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,000
Re: Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jistic
I would go.

1. Arica
2. Isla Inocentes
3. Valporaiso
4. Nelson Bay
5. Port Valdez
6. Laguna Presa

Presa needs a lot of work if it's gonna be a competitive map.

Valdez I think I'm just burned out on from the demo days. Nelson Bay I hated but lately is growing on me. My top 3 are almost a dead even to me. I just love desert maps though. Arica feels like a journey cuz it's varied.
Nelson Bay, I like it aesthetically but it only has three sets of m-coms and this is the map where I always get stuck with the team that has no idea what they're doing. Plus, I don't like how a lot of the m-coms on it can get destroyed by destruction 2.0. I would like Isla Inocentes more but again three sets of m-coms and I always get stuck on the noob team. Port Valdez does seem a bit worn down but I tend to get more balanced games on it, which I like.
__________________
Lux y Veritas
sportsdude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 03:37 PM   #2408
Hall Of Fame
 
Jistic's Arena
 
OVR: 28
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, ILL
Posts: 16,404
Re: Battlefield 2: Bad Company and Battlefield 1943 announced

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportsdude
Nelson Bay, I like it aesthetically but it only has three sets of m-coms and this is the map where I always get stuck with the team that has no idea what they're doing. Plus, I don't like how a lot of the m-coms on it can get destroyed by destruction 2.0. I would like Isla Inocentes more but again three sets of m-coms and I always get stuck on the noob team. Port Valdez does seem a bit worn down but I tend to get more balanced games on it, which I like.
The best thing about Nelson is using the mounted guns. Nobody uses them. Rack up the kills. I think destruction 2.0 is fine there because the defense usually fights offensively anyway. The last Mcom they gotta come and get anyway.

I love the 2nd set of MCOMS in Isle Innocentes. Even though there's only 3 sets that is usually a LONG game because it's difficult to get the MCOMS on all 3. Unless one team is superior my games there are usually epic.
__________________
PSN: JISTIC_OS
XBOX LIVE: JISTIC

Jistic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Other > Non-Sports Gaming »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.

Top -