03-03-2015, 05:23 AM
|
#25
|
Pro
|
Re: Conference Tie Ins
|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by JEJunior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a few days ago Maurice came up with an idea for something else could try.. I kinda put the pieces together for it but tell me what you guys think
-we use 3 groups for ooc games: top 4, next 4, last 4
-based on conference wins first, then bcs rankings next after week 15..
-1 plays 3 and 4 in each group, 2 plays 3 and 4 in each group
-higher seed chooses home, away or neutral
-only 2 games so a 3rd ooc can be vs cpu or another user if you schedule it
-every year determines the next year
if that didnt make sense, this would be the ooc schedule for next year..
A 1 Wash 2 Miami 3 Bama 4 Mich
.....Wash vs Mich, Miami vs Bama,
.....Wash vs Bama, Miami vs Mich
B 1 OSU 2 Ore 3 Ark 4 UNC
..... OSU vs UNC, Ore vs Ark,
..... OSU vs Ark, UNC vs Ore
C 1 Mar 2 USC 3 A&M 4 LSU
..... Mar vs LSU, USC vs A&M,
..... Mar vs A&M, USC vs LSU
like I said, thats only 2 games so I could schedule Hogan for giving me sanctions, or my lil bro could schedule Joker to get a high ranked game, or Michigan vs ND for a rival game before ND left... plenty of chances to move up
good thing is if a team has a down year (especially afyet a real good year) then it will actually show up on the field.. a team like UNC could run the table if he beats Miami and Miami loses to Bama or Michigan, but then next year UNC would be in the top bracket.. a lot of possibilities for good competition and just something new we could try in general.. 2 games shouldnt affect the realism too much either
|
|
|
|
|
|
My vote... put this in the tally sheet. High key I do actually like this idea.
|
|
|