More Links

Klocker · 09-03-2003, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Sully713 said:
I came here hoping to read a review being that your subject says Fever Review....yet you didnt review one aspect of the game.
False advertising
I hope your ignorance isnt contagious

that is true!

Ankido · 09-03-2003, 10:41 PM

Here is my gamespot review that I wrote.

I will not waist my time talking about this game so I'll be brief.

Gameplay is the worse ever in history of console games. I mean common, you would think to polish up the conrolling of the game like Madden or ESPN.

Graphics are probably the best so far compared to madden and what I've seen with espn. Some of the player facials are dead on.

Sound is a bit weak with Ron Pitts and I believe they can do better. But all around the sound is what you would hear in football games with music from actual NFL highlights.

Value of the game is not worth the buy. The only thing that makes this game interesting is the online play.

My reviewers tilt would be, "I HATE THIS YEARS FEVER 2004". Like someone said, "Microsoft, give up on football games because it ain't working for ya."

Gameplay 5

Graphics 9

Sound 8

Value 7

Reviewers tilt 6

Overall 6.5

Klocker · 09-03-2003, 11:30 PM

Much better.

thanks!

see ya

Goaty · 09-03-2003, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Ankido said:
Here is my gamespot review that I wrote.

Why do you feel the need to review Fever twice in your thread? Should we all look forward to a 3rd review telling us that you hate Fever?

Ankido · 09-03-2003, 11:54 PM

No, the review from gamespot was my official review. My first review was just off the fly talk.

BIGROC · 09-05-2003, 10:19 AM

fever does have some bad controls. i cant remember which set up it is, but i have to set the d to millenium, but if i set my d for that, it puts everything else on it. theres no mapping to the controller which is pretty stupid. y do i have to tackle with b? (millenium is x) but then i stiff arm with a face button? lol its crap.
aside from my db's looking like they're 90 when i take them over, and thats just the beginning.
i tried to believe in fever, but its inside pitch all over again. a game i wouldnt touch if it wasnt online, well, thats not even true, if it didnt have xsn. which by the way screwed us all, because if there wasnt xsn, we could have had espn leagues and tournys.
fever can eat my ***. although im still playing it because ive signed up for leagues, and i cant just quit.

09-03-2003, 05:17 PM	#9
Klocker MVP OVR: 16 Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Gilbert, AZ	Re: Fever Review....not good. Quote: *Sully713 said:* I came here hoping to read a review being that your subject says Fever Review....yet you didnt review one aspect of the game. False advertising I hope your ignorance isnt contagious that is true!

09-03-2003, 10:41 PM	#10
Ankido Pro OVR: 14 Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: San Jose, CA. Blog Entries: 3	Re: Fever Review....not good. Here is my gamespot review that I wrote. I will not waist my time talking about this game so I'll be brief. Gameplay is the worse ever in history of console games. I mean common, you would think to polish up the conrolling of the game like Madden or ESPN. Graphics are probably the best so far compared to madden and what I've seen with espn. Some of the player facials are dead on. Sound is a bit weak with Ron Pitts and I believe they can do better. But all around the sound is what you would hear in football games with music from actual NFL highlights. Value of the game is not worth the buy. The only thing that makes this game interesting is the online play. My reviewers tilt would be, "I HATE THIS YEARS FEVER 2004". Like someone said, "Microsoft, give up on football games because it ain't working for ya." Gameplay 5 Graphics 9 Sound 8 Value 7 Reviewers tilt 6 Overall 6.5

09-03-2003, 11:30 PM	#11
Klocker MVP OVR: 16 Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Gilbert, AZ	Re: Fever Review....not good. Much better. thanks! see ya

09-03-2003, 11:40 PM	#12
Goaty Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Tampa, FL	Re: Fever Review....not good. Quote: *Ankido said:* Here is my gamespot review that I wrote. Why do you feel the need to review Fever twice in your thread? Should we all look forward to a 3rd review telling us that you hate Fever?

09-03-2003, 11:54 PM	#13
Ankido Pro OVR: 14 Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: San Jose, CA. Blog Entries: 3	Re: Fever Review....not good. No, the review from gamespot was my official review. My first review was just off the fly talk.

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

09-05-2003, 10:19 AM	#14
BIGROC Pro OVR: 9 Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Hillside, NJ Blog Entries: 3	Re: Fever Review....not good. fever does have some bad controls. i cant remember which set up it is, but i have to set the d to millenium, but if i set my d for that, it puts everything else on it. theres no mapping to the controller which is pretty stupid. y do i have to tackle with b? (millenium is x) but then i stiff arm with a face button? lol its crap. aside from my db's looking like they're 90 when i take them over, and thats just the beginning. i tried to believe in fever, but its inside pitch all over again. a game i wouldnt touch if it wasnt online, well, thats not even true, if it didnt have xsn. which by the way screwed us all, because if there wasnt xsn, we could have had espn leagues and tournys. fever can eat my ***. although im still playing it because ive signed up for leagues, and i cant just quit.

More Links

Fever Review....not good.