Quote:
|
Re: Recruiting Tips (NCAA 14)
Quote:
|
Re: Recruiting Tips (NCAA 14)
Quote:
Using Michigan, you have inherent advantages over 90% of the schools in the game since most of your pitches are hovering around A or so + a decent coach skill rating. To get a recruit to the stage of visiting/50% interest, you need a few weeks of recruiting (light or heavy point input). You will also have bonus advantages over most schools. But say you and Ohio State go after the same recruit... you have similar pitch scores, similar trees and they could put all their points in recruits. By time your recruit wants to visit, OSU is not going to be too far behind. Get a decent early trip, but OSU can still put 1,000+ points per week into a recruit. The 800 point difference after a visit isn't too difficult for them to make up. Matter of fact, they can certainly make that up since they won't be locked out and they will have a visit in the future worth more points. However, recruit against another lower level big 10 school. Indiana, Northwestern, or any of the MAC Michigan schools... yes, you have advantages they don't. You can build a greater lead against smaller competition & continue to build a lead after an early recruit. Using Michigan has those built in advantages, but if you were to try this strategy with mid tier schools (majority of the game), it's not as effective. |
Re: Recruiting Tips (NCAA 14)
Quote:
I only schedule later if I'm behind on a recruit and know that I won't get a commit and will just lose that ground gained when the cpu gets their visits. In those cases I hope I am able to pair a lock break with a visit to get a massive boost and maybe a commit. I've done that before a couple of times at least. |
Re: Recruiting Tips (NCAA 14)
This has probably been covered a bunch but in our OD we started all coaches off at Level 1 (or Level 0, whatever the lowest is). Everyone is at a 5 or 6-star prestige school.
We just hit our first off season and everyone's class was atrocious. Guys lost out on recruits to 3-star schools (recruits who's top choice was a user school). We had no pull with our targets. Most of us scheduled visits early in the year which turned out to be disastrous. So are we screwed for a few seasons because we all have terrible coaching attributes? Should we just start over and make our coaches better from the jump? At this rate it looks like Bama, ND, USC and other user powerhouses are going to have at least half their starters in the low 70's in a couple of years. :lol: |
Re: Recruiting Tips (NCAA 14)
Quote:
|
Re: Recruiting Tips (NCAA 14)
Quote:
Do coaching attributes mean THAT much that I can't sway a guy over NMSU? I just won the B1G regular season, conference championship game and the Rose Bowl to boot. |
Re: Recruiting Tips (NCAA 14)
Quote:
And yes, coaching attributes mean too much, probably. I want the school prestige to matter more. Recruiting point totals should be based on prestige, with coach skills giving small boosts here and there. Bonus points do a decent job at separating the big schools from the small, but not enough IMO. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.