NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
Here is a video clip I captured of all the team ratings in NCAA Football 09. I was told these ratings WILL change before release, but it's something to discuss amongst yourselves. It is probably a little hard to make out the numbers, but I'm sure someone will get them all.
Tags: None -
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)

I can't make out the numbers. I need
I can't shave with my eyes closed, meaning each day I have to look at myself in the mirror and respect who I see.
I miss the old days of Operation Sports :(
Louisville Cardinals/St.Louis Cardinals -
Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
I do notice they use numbers as opposed to letter grades, and the lesser rated teams are in the 50s and 40s.
UF's offense looks like a 98 from here..........
FSU looks like a 90 overall with the 87 offense.
The Irish are a 68 overall, 72 offense and defense.Favorite Teams:
NBA: Houston Rockets
NFL: Tennessee Titans
MLB: Chicago White Sox
NCAA: Florida State Seminoles
Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
Typical.
Florida...with a defense that resembled Swiss Cheese gets a 91 rating.
Auburn...with a defense that finished #6 in the nation (and has finished in the top 10 nationally SEVEN straight years) defensively gets a 79 rating.
This had better change substantially before release EA.
Last edited by AuburnAlumni; 05-08-2008, 10:28 PM.AUBURN TIGERS
MINNESOTA VIKINGS
INDIANA PACERSComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
lol, I would say these will definitely change before release or there will be some really happy fans in florida, and some upset auburn fans.WUSTLComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
can also tell who all has their stadiums in and who doesntComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
I'll put money down right now that Florida still has a higher defensive rating..along with about 10-15 other teams....than Auburn at release.
Guaranteed.
In my personal dynasty, it won't matter because I will do my own edits, etc.
But in my online dynasty....ugh.AUBURN TIGERS
MINNESOTA VIKINGS
INDIANA PACERSComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
So the tentative top 25 is
1 Georgia
2 Oklahoma
3 Ohio State
4 USC
5 Florida
6 LSU
7 Missouri
8 West Virginia
9 Wisconsin
10 Texas
11 Clemson
12 Texas Tech
13 Penn State
14 Arizona State
15 Kansas
16 Auburn
17 Virginia Tech
18 Illinois
19 Tennessee
20 BYU
21 South Carolina
22 Alabama
23 Oregon
24 Cincinatti
25 Wake ForestComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
i think there will be alot of changes to come, or at least i hope, the gaps from the high-end to middle seems a little high and the gap from middle to low-end seems even bigger. if not, then playing as Western Kentucky should be a huge challenge. looks like they have a 30 overall, 40 or 48 offense, 33 defense.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
What's funny though is the RANKINGS mean squat.So the tentative top 25 is
1 Georgia
2 Oklahoma
3 Ohio State
4 USC
5 Florida
6 LSU
7 Missouri
8 West Virginia
9 Wisconsin
10 Texas
11 Clemson
12 Texas Tech
13 Penn State
14 Arizona State
15 Kansas
16 Auburn
17 Virginia Tech
18 Illinois
19 Tennessee
20 BYU
21 South Carolina
22 Alabama
23 Oregon
24 Cincinatti
25 Wake Forest
The RATINGS is where its at and most likely a team like FSU will be "unranked" yet have a RATING higher than over half of the Top 25 teams.
That's usually how it goes.AUBURN TIGERS
MINNESOTA VIKINGS
INDIANA PACERSComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
our defense should be great if that new d-coordinator doesn't mess it up. I just hope our secondary can keep up with the rest of the D, we got sen'derrick marks, tray blackmon, and our new juco transfer raven gray. We should have a solid D.
At least benjamin's a beast
The Crimson Tide and the Tigers square off on the gridiron in this gameplay clip of NCAA Football 09.
by the way on another gameplay I saw that they had our new hd screen in the game
Last edited by auburntigersfan; 05-08-2008, 11:44 PM.WUSTLComment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
The gaps are a little off, but at least there is a gap, as opposed to the Dukes and Temples getting C+.i think there will be alot of changes to come, or at least i hope, the gaps from the high-end to middle seems a little high and the gap from middle to low-end seems even bigger. if not, then playing as Western Kentucky should be a huge challenge. looks like they have a 30 overall, 40 or 48 offense, 33 defense.
In reality though, UGA should be the highest team at about a 92, then the rest of the top 5 at 91ish, then the ranked teams in the 80s, mid tier bowl teams in the 70s/upper 60s, bad teams in the 50s, and Sun Belt, WAC, and MAC teams in the 40s.
There's not a preseason 2004 USC or 2002 Miami team going into this year, so there shouldn't be a team rated that high.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 09 Team Ratings (These are NOT Final)
Any chance we could get a typed-out list or something zoomed in to the right side itself? I realize beggars can't be choosers but I can't read hardly any of them... at least not the ones I'm interested in.Comment

Comment