inflated rosters? (little long)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GoBlue10
    Rookie
    • May 2008
    • 191

    #1

    inflated rosters? (little long)

    I was bored today so I did a little research. I looked at 16 classic powers rosters on teambuilder to see how different they can actually be.

    team - final ranking - (2008 record) - # of players ranked 90+

    Florida - 1 - (13-1) - 18
    USC - 3 - (12-1) - 18
    Texas - 4 - (12-1) - 12
    Oklahoma - 5 - (12-2) - 15
    Alabama - 6 - (12-2) - 10
    Penn St. - 8 - (11-2) - 8
    Ohio St. - 9 - (10-3) - 7
    Georgia - 12 - (10-3) - 12
    VT - 15 - (10-4) - 8
    FSU - 21 - (9-4) - 10
    Nebraska - NA - (9-4) - 5
    LSU - NA - (8-5) - 10
    Miami - NA - (7-6) - 7
    Notre Dame - NA - (7-6) - 6
    Tennessee - NA - (5-7) - 6
    Michigan - NA - (3-9) - 4

    Just looking at these rosters there are way WAY too many players ranked 90+ for the top teams. I can see 10-12 players max ranked 90+, but 18 is rediculous. That is saying 18 players from Florida and USC's roster will be drafted this year. Sorry, I'm not drinking that cool aid.

    (1) Florida only had 3 players taken in this years NFL draft
    (3) USC had 11
    (4) Texas had 4
    (5) Oklahoma had 5
    (6) Alabama had 4
    (8) Penn St. had 5
    (9) Ohio St. had 7





    Information was taken from ESPN.com and EA Teambuilder
    Go Blue!
  • eritraj
    Rookie
    • Mar 2009
    • 269

    #2
    Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

    Florida could easily have 7-10 players drafted this year depending on who leaves early for the NFL.

    I do agree though...The ratings are very inflated and this years roster, among other problems, are why I will not be purchasing NCAA this for the first time since NCAA 99.

    Comment

    • Moostache
      Banned
      • Jul 2006
      • 530

      #3
      Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

      I am not surprised...remember, these are not "real" rosters of actual players (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)...and the devs do have their favorites to stack each year (*cough...Florida State...cough*)

      Comment

      • SHO
        Give us a raise, loser!
        • Mar 2005
        • 2045

        #4
        Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

        NCAA needs the rating spread more than Madden does.

        Comment

        • Moostache
          Banned
          • Jul 2006
          • 530

          #5
          Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

          Originally posted by NOBLE
          NCAA needs the rating spread more than Madden does.
          ^^^^^
          Oh so painfully true!!

          The difference in ability between a typical Freshman and a 5th year Senior All-American is far greater than almost anything in the NFL (players who can't cut mustard in the NFL don't last very long before being cut...)...
          Last edited by Moostache; 06-05-2009, 03:45 PM. Reason: spelling gaffes!

          Comment

          • amoore0192
            Pro
            • May 2009
            • 632

            #6
            Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

            Just because the gators had a ton of college talent doesnt necissarilly mean it will transfer to the pros. Its because of the type of offense they run, look at Pat White from WVU, we can all agree that he was one of the best players in college, but his skill set doesnt transfer well into the pro game. This statement is true for any spread team, Florida included, Harvin this year, Demps and Rainey will all suffer from being labled "system" players. So just because a player has high ratings in colleg doesnt mean theyll be a top nfl pick. Especially when more and more nfl teams draft needs, instead of best available. Look at Reggie Bush, another of the college games greats, but we can all say he has yet to find his niche in the pros, so just because a player is rated high in a college game doesnt mean they should translate to a top ranked nfl prospect.

            CUSTOM COVERS
            &
            CUSTOM UNIFORM DESIGNS

            Comment

            • UtahUtes32
              MVP
              • Jul 2007
              • 1782

              #7
              Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

              um so couldn't help but notice you left Utah off the list, who finished #2.

              Comment

              • UtahUtes32
                MVP
                • Jul 2007
                • 1782

                #8
                Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

                Originally posted by NOBLE
                NCAA needs the rating spread more than Madden does.
                I agree, because DEPTH is something that is so huge in College football. I think it would make a huge huge difference in the game.

                Comment

                • da ThRONe
                  Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 8528

                  #9
                  Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

                  Originally posted by amoore0192
                  Just because the gators had a ton of college talent doesnt necissarilly mean it will transfer to the pros. Its because of the type of offense they run, look at Pat White from WVU, we can all agree that he was one of the best players in college, but his skill set doesnt transfer well into the pro game. This statement is true for any spread team, Florida included, Harvin this year, Demps and Rainey will all suffer from being labled "system" players. So just because a player has high ratings in colleg doesnt mean theyll be a top nfl pick. Especially when more and more nfl teams draft needs, instead of best available. Look at Reggie Bush, another of the college games greats, but we can all say he has yet to find his niche in the pros, so just because a player is rated high in a college game doesnt mean they should translate to a top ranked nfl prospect.
                  Pat White was an early second round pick and havent taking one snap in the NFL. How can you say that his skill set does not transfer to the pros? And he was the best looking prospect throwing the ball at the combine.

                  Reggie Bush was tied for all purpose TD last year before he got hurt. And lead all RB's in catches his rookie season!
                  You looking at the Chair MAN!

                  Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

                  Comment

                  • da ThRONe
                    Fire LesS Miles ASAP!
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 8528

                    #10
                    Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

                    Originally posted by NOBLE
                    NCAA needs the rating spread more than Madden does.
                    I have been sayin this for months now. I had people arguing me saying the level of talent in college is closer than the pros which just makes no sense!
                    You looking at the Chair MAN!

                    Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.

                    Comment

                    • GoBlue10
                      Rookie
                      • May 2008
                      • 191

                      #11
                      Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

                      Originally posted by pimpycraig
                      um so couldn't help but notice you left Utah off the list, who finished #2.


                      <TABLE class=infobox style="FONT-SIZE: 90%; WIDTH: 25em; TEXT-ALIGN: left"><TBODY><TR><TD>All-time record</TD><TD>607–418–31 (.589)</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

                      #34 all time

                      that's why
                      Go Blue!

                      Comment

                      • xxjgbxx
                        Pro
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 694

                        #12
                        Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

                        just because they are rated good in ncaa doest mean they are draft material, they are 90 + because they are good players in college and their team wins

                        Comment

                        • GoBlue10
                          Rookie
                          • May 2008
                          • 191

                          #13
                          Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

                          Originally posted by xxjgbxx
                          just because they are rated good in ncaa doest mean they are draft material, they are 90 + because they are good players in college and their team wins
                          if they are really good players in college then don't you think they should at least get drafted...i mean there are 250+ players drafted a year and your saying if they are worth a 90+ overall they aren't worthy of a tryout by a pro team...sorry still not buying that

                          inflated rosters...no way U$C or Florida are worthy of 18 players that are 90+
                          Go Blue!

                          Comment

                          • Cvhsalumni
                            Rookie
                            • May 2008
                            • 66

                            #14
                            Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

                            Originally posted by GoBlue10
                            <TABLE class=infobox style="FONT-SIZE: 90%; WIDTH: 25em; TEXT-ALIGN: left"><TBODY><TR><TD>All-time record</TD><TD>607–418–31 (.589)</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

                            #34 all time

                            that's why
                            Haha, that's a stupid reason.

                            Comment

                            • Rbush903
                              Rookie
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 53

                              #15
                              Re: inflated rosters? (little long)

                              Originally posted by amoore0192
                              Just because the gators had a ton of college talent doesnt necissarilly mean it will transfer to the pros. Its because of the type of offense they run, look at Pat White from WVU, we can all agree that he was one of the best players in college, but his skill set doesnt transfer well into the pro game. This statement is true for any spread team, Florida included, Harvin this year, Demps and Rainey will all suffer from being labled "system" players. So just because a player has high ratings in colleg doesnt mean theyll be a top nfl pick. Especially when more and more nfl teams draft needs, instead of best available. Look at Reggie Bush, another of the college games greats, but we can all say he has yet to find his niche in the pros, so just because a player is rated high in a college game doesnt mean they should translate to a top ranked nfl prospect.
                              please dont forget Mr. Rose Bowl himself Vince Young

                              Comment

                              Working...