Blown call ? Cincy FG wide right? w/ pic
 

What do you guys think? Not that it really matters for the Browns, but it should be important because if it could happen in this game, it could happen in a game with your favorite team with more on the line:

Re: Blown call ? Cincy FG wide right? w/ pic
 

If he makes it the Browns lose, if he doesn't, it's a tie.

Either way, I don't care.

Re: Blown call ? Cincy FG wide right? w/ pic
 

'Twas definitely not good.

Re: Blown call ? Cincy FG wide right? w/ pic
 

I have no idea what I'm looking at in that picture, lol.

Either way don't trust the cameras. You never know what angles they're sitting at. If the ball doesn't go past the uprights, so it's clear to see the upright either cross the ball or not, then there's no way of knowing for sure unless it's either not even close or you have a view from directly above or below.

Re: Blown call ? Cincy FG wide right? w/ pic
 

I remember watching it live and thinking that he missed it. Then the announcer called it good and I was shocked to see the refs signaling that he made it.

This pic confirms what I thought I saw. I'm surprised more wasn't made of this.

Re: Blown call ? Cincy FG wide right? w/ pic
 

The ball disappears behind the upright. No good.

Too bad. It would have been hilarious to see the Bengas tie 2 years in a row.

Re: Blown call ? Cincy FG wide right? w/ pic
 

I can't really tell there. Did CBS show a shot from under the goal posts? The conventional camera view isn't always the best as i've seen MANY FGs that I thought were good called off and some I thought were not FGs called as FGs.

The best view is the one the refs take underneath the posts.

Re: Blown call ? Cincy FG wide right? w/ pic
 

Why the the frown Charlie Brown?



Yeah the picture is grainy for sure. Its the best I could find. Like I said, the Browns are bad and it really doesnt make a difference if the lost or tied. Just curious on principle.