realism
 

since this seems to be the buzzword of today, lets look at making ACQB more realistic:

1. no playbook switching every game, you pick a playbook, and use it all season, switching playbooks, is like switching coordinators who switches coordinators every week?

2. blitzing should not be a every down playcall, no one blitzes every play, noteven rex ryan, and his daddy.

3. if you get a big lead, your starters should be pulled, but not in this league, i know when i get down i pull starters for fear of injury, but that may just be a twosilk thing

Re: realism
 

1. I'm gonna use w/e Playbook I feel, when I feel

2. I will blitz how ever much I feel, when I feel

3. I will run up the score, Steve Spurrier style



This is a result of you not liking VA's idea. This thread is not needed. C'mon man

no shiz this has been on my mind for sometime, and honestly we can put his idea to a vote instead of me being a prick, and just saying no which could have happened

Re: realism
 

o, ok

Re: realism
 

I guess no one should ever make a suggestion again since it upsets twosilk so much.


I just found video footage of twosilk

put it to a vote shiz i really dont care, i simply voiced my opinion, which last i checked is no crime is it?

Re: realism
 

good post Silk:smile:

I would like to add in the spirit of improving the online ACQB experience that we limit these guaranteed contracts to no more than 1-3 years(short contracts no penalty at all) Long contracts only guaranteed for 2 seasons). IRL Jamarcus Russell will be getting cut soon, guess what? the Raiders aren't paying him jack when he is gone.(to my understanding of the situation) Why should I be forced to reduce my cap with players that I want to dump. I would have cut several more players a long time ago if our salary system was less like the NBA and more like the NFL.

Re: realism
 

Oh Yeah, switching playbooks every game is lame. That Is like switching coordinators, Silk has a very good point about this.