Why are player ratings so bad this year?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
Basically it's insanely hard and time consuming to correctly scout and evaluate 70 players for 120 teams. that's at least 8400 players.
Colorado State Rams Florida Gators Colorado Rockies Denver Nuggets Denver BroncosComment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
Ratings are biased and there hasn't been a roster ever created that made everyone happy...
It's an alternate universe for me so no biggie...Joshua:
"D.O.D. pension files indicate current mailing as: Dr. Robert Hume,
a.k.a. Stephen W. Falken, 5 Tall Cedar Road, Goose Island, Oregon"
Skyboxer OS TWITCH
STEAM
PSN: Skyboxeros
SWITCH 8211-0709-4612
XBOX Skyboxer OSComment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
Tell me about it Adrian Clayborn for Iowa is a consensus pre-season All-American, and considered by most nfl scouts the best over player in the country. He's hands down the best player in the big ten, yet hes a 91 overall 4th best player on the team. Then they have him at left end when he's going on his 3rd year of starting at right end. They also have Iowa free safety Brett Greenwood, who is a very smart savy player, but not very athletic, or physically gifted in the low-mid 90s, when I'd rate him no where over 87.Comment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
I am sure that there will more than one roster set to fix the problems. I just hope it is not like last years....there where so many 90 + players after the first year.Comment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
They changed ratings this year and spaced them out more. The same thing they did to Madden last year.Comment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
I wouldn't spend that much time complaining about a player being rated lower. Most every team has dozens of players who stats don't make sense. Tech has PLENTY that should be adjusted.Tell me about it Adrian Clayborn for Iowa is a consensus pre-season All-American, and considered by most nfl scouts the best over player in the country. He's hands down the best player in the big ten, yet hes a 91 overall 4th best player on the team. Then they have him at left end when he's going on his 3rd year of starting at right end. They also have Iowa free safety Brett Greenwood, who is a very smart savy player, but not very athletic, or physically gifted in the low-mid 90s, when I'd rate him no where over 87.
Really don't mind though, if it means that much to me I'll adjust the attributes myself.Comment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
Yeah, I'll get over it. I'm just glad they got our uniforms right for the first time in 3 years. That was a joke.I wouldn't spend that much time complaining about a player being rated lower. Most every team has dozens of players who stats don't make sense. Tech has PLENTY that should be adjusted.
Really don't mind though, if it means that much to me I'll adjust the attributes myself.Comment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
tell that to Greg Jones LMAOTell me about it Adrian Clayborn for Iowa is a consensus pre-season All-American, and considered by most nfl scouts the best over player in the country. He's hands down the best player in the big ten, yet hes a 91 overall 4th best player on the team. Then they have him at left end when he's going on his 3rd year of starting at right end. They also have Iowa free safety Brett Greenwood, who is a very smart savy player, but not very athletic, or physically gifted in the low-mid 90s, when I'd rate him no where over 87.Comment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
Should there be a ratings thread in the roster forum to discuss this and maybe come up with a consensus on changes?After more than eight years on here, I finally figured out how to edit my time zone!Comment
-
Re: Why are player ratings so bad this year?
They changed ratings this year and spaced them out more. The same thing they did to Madden last year.Comment
-
Comment

Comment