I've searched the forums and can't find any info on team ratings for this year. Has anyone posted anything so far? I know I saw Alabama was 99 ovr, 94 off, 99 def.
-
-
Re: Team Ratings
Clemson is 91 OVR, 90 OFF, 90 DEF
I'm pretty pumped they had an awesome recruiting class this past year and with a new offense they are going to be fun to play with, especially starting a dynasty considering how young they are. We had 4 5* so it will be interesting to see their player ratings. -
Re: Team Ratings
Ole Miss is an 88 overall.
I'd love for an Ole Miss fan/s to defend that ridiculously high rating for a team that went 4-8 last year.
I get the SEC is great thing as I'm a fan of a team in it, but some of these ratings are a bit over the top. I'm afraid Auburn is going to get rated far too high as well...they have nothing back from last year's team. Use some common sense EA.
I also love how Kentucky can go to 5 straight bowl games and yet we will probably still be rated 4-5 overalls lower than Ole Miss...at least. I don't have an issue with Kentucky being a low 80s ranked school...that's fine, but Ole Miss at 88? Sorry, just one that stood out to me.Comment
-
Re: Team Ratings
I am an Auburn fan, I don't think we will be overrated... I think after 2 straight top 5 recruiting classes we should be young but talented. All the ratings I've seen look high this year to me. I'll say Auburn should be
overall - 90
offense - 92 mainly because of Gus
defense- 87
That is just going off what I think it should be considering Bama 99 Rating and Ole Miss 88 rating.Comment
-
Re: Team Ratings
I'd be ok with that ranking. It appears a lot of schools are in the 90s this year...a 90 is fine with the recruiting classes, and potential of your young players.
I just figured with you guys 12th in the polls they might jack you up to 94 or 95.
What do you think about Ole Miss being an 88? I guess due to them getting semi decent recruiting classes that explains it somewhat but they lost quite a bit of starters from last year's team as well.Comment
-
Re: Team Ratihttp://www.operationsports.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquotngs
Per the video with Kirk Herbstreit:
Air Force- 83
Off- 84
Def- 81
Akron- 60
Off- 60
Def- 61
Alabama- 99
Off- 94
Def- 99
Arizona- 89
Off- 90
Def- 85
Arizona State- 89
Off- 88
Def- Can't see, video changes
Cincinnati- 88
Off- 90
Def- 82
Clemson- 92
Off- 91
Def- 93
Colorado- 83
Off- 85
Def- 79
Colorado State- 78
Off- 78
Def- 76
Connecticut- 81
Off- 84
Def- Can't see, video changes
Florida Atlantic- 69
Off- 69
Def- 67
Florida State- 94
Off- 94
Def- 91
Fresno State- 84
Off- 85
Def- 82
Georgia- 91
Off- 93
Def- 87
Georgia Tech- 84
Off- 84
Def- Can't see, video changes
Houston- 78
Off- 87
Def- 72
Idaho- 69
Off- 76
Def- 66
Illinois- 77
Off- 77
Def- 77
Indiana- 80
Off- 87
Def- 74
Iowa- 86
Off- 92
Def- 82
Iowa State- 81
Off- 86
Def- 78
Kansas- 81
Off- 81
Def- 82
Kansas State- 81
Off- 82
Def- 80
Kent State- 66
Off- 68
Def- 68
LA Tech- 69
Off- 73
Def- 69
Louisville- 78
Off- 77
Def- 80
Marshall- 78
Off- 82
Def- 76
Maryland- 81
Off- 82
Def- 80
Memphis- 64
Off- 66
Def- 64
Miami- 92
Off- 95
Def- 90
Miami OH- 67
Off- 63
Def- 73
Michigan- 86
Off- 87
Def- Can't see, video changes
Southern Miss- 84
Off- 87
Def- 79
Stanford- 95
Off- 97
Def- 91
TCU- 92
Off- 94
Def- 88
Temple- 75
Off- 78
Def- 73
Tennessee- 89
Off- 87
Def- Can't see, video changes
Texas- 94
Off- 94
Def- 92
Texas A&M- 89
Off- 94
Def- 84
Texas Tech- 88
Off- 94
Def- 81
Toledo- 72
Off- 81
Def- 68Comment
-
Re: Team Ratings
I wonder if the "rating guy" is a U alum, because Miami is always jacked up way too high. 95 offense? Lol are you serious bro?Comment
-
Re: Team Ratihttp://www.operationsports.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquotngs
I am not going to quote the whole list to avoid cluttering the thread but I just thought it was kind of odd that ALMOST every single school on that list has a better or near equal O than D. Maybe it is accurate to real life but I just took notice to that and found it interesting.Comment
-
Re: Team Ratihttp://www.operationsports.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquotngs
Looks like they bumped up the better non-AQs a bit. The team ratings looked to be grouped together and not directly comparable.
Elite teams - = 92-99
Good/Prestigous BCS teams - = 85-91
Decent to lower BCS/ Upper mid-majors = 77-84
Average mid-majors - = 70-76
Bad Mid-majors - =60-69Comment
-
Re: Team Ratings
These ratings are way too high.
Wish list for 2013:
Totally new dynamic commentary
Totally new ratings system
Then again, if they simply allow editing of ratings I can do a lot of them myself lol.Comment
-
Re: Team Ratings
Ya I cross checked them with the coaching carosel video and some match and some don't.Originally posted by Tex_agmlbComment
-
Re: Team Ratings
Yeah, every team so far is higher than they should be. 6-7 Tennessee is 89? 6-7 Clemson is 91? 4-8 Ole Miss is 88? 4-8 Cincinnati is 88? 6-7 UGA is 91? Makes no sense at all, none of those teams should be above 85, at best. There are a lot of other examples but I don't want to list them all. I'm not trying to knock these schools either but teams that had losing records the previous season should not be rated a B or B+.Comment
Comment