Post Season Awards Make No Sense

[TDenverFan]

The Post Season Awards make no sense. My TB is mediocre (7-5, 5-2 WAC) but has a fantastic Punter/Kicker, Adam Horn.
22/24 FG, 59 Yard Long (Highest in NCAA), 8/10 50+ Yards, 7/7 40-49 Yards.
49.7 Yards A Punt, Best in the NCAA by 1.2 Yards.

The current leader for the Best K award: 20/22, 44 Yard Long from UK. Adam Horn is 10th.
The current Leader for best punter: 43.6 Y/Punt, not in the Top 10 in the NCAA from UNC. Adam Horn is not in the Top 12.

He should be 1st in both, or at least Top 3 if the fact that the WAC is weak hurts him. 1 Punter might be better, he's from Oregon. 47.5 Y/Punt, but he has 12 more attempts. He's 7th in the best punter awards.

The logic for these awards makes no sense.

[TheLeviticalLawKid3]

Re: Post Season Awards Make No Sense

What is his true position? From experience, you can't be in the running for both the Guy and Groza awards...only what position he's listed as.

He can hit twenty FGs from 50+ yards, but if he's listed as a punter...you won't win the Groza award.

[TDenverFan]

Re: Post Season Awards Make No Sense

What is his true position? From experience, you can't be in the running for both the Guy and Groza awards...only what position he's listed as.

He can hit twenty FGs from 50+ yards, but if he's listed as a punter...you won't win the Groza award.

Kicker, I think. Either way, he should be in the top 3 for at least one of the awards.

Plus, my TE was in contention for the WR award.

[TheCalvin]

Re: Post Season Awards Make No Sense

That sounds like you have a WR as your TE, like the guy above said, you can only win awards for your true position, Denard Robinson isn't gonna win the Doak Walker even if he rushes for 2500 yards