Goalkeepers - Traditional vs Acrobatic

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RagingTrav
    Rookie
    • Sep 2012
    • 298

    #1

    Goalkeepers - Traditional vs Acrobatic

    Which style of goalkeeper do you prefer/find better? Personally from experiences playing I find the acrobatic keepers are better shot stoppers as long as they have some decent height. Traditional keepers seem a little slow to react IMO. What are everybody elses opinions though?
    Nashville Predators GM
    http://www.operationsports.com/RagingTrav/dynasty/
  • CLEAR17
    Rookie
    • Mar 2009
    • 347

    #2
    Re: Goalkeepers - Traditional vs Acrobatic

    I've used Traditional more often. I think the Trad keeper tends to catch the ball better but is slower. I think the Acrobatic keeper can stop more shot but allows too many rebounds...imo
    Fifa player
    United Red Devils

    Comment

    • _ChicoBass
      MVP
      • Dec 2012
      • 1816

      #3
      I've also felt that traditional goalkeepers are better at 1 on 1's. The acrobatic keeper is great at long shots though. IMO

      Comment

      • RagingTrav
        Rookie
        • Sep 2012
        • 298

        #4
        Re: Goalkeepers - Traditional vs Acrobatic

        Originally posted by _ChicoBass
        I've also felt that traditional goalkeepers are better at 1 on 1's. The acrobatic keeper is great at long shots though. IMO
        I've found the 1 on 1's the other way around. The acrobatic keepers react to shots quicker than the traditional keepers who may get in a better position but are often beaten if it isn't hit straight at them.

        My opinion anyway.
        Nashville Predators GM
        http://www.operationsports.com/RagingTrav/dynasty/

        Comment

        Working...