Rookies that are playing better/worse than their ratings

[bm011]

So every year there seems to be some players that play much better in-game than their rating would suggest (also the opposite). For example, drummond's rookie year he was a 59, but was still a beast in the game. Is there any rookie that you have discovered yet (whether they were in the top 5 of the first round or the bottom of the 2nd round) that you think plays quite a bit better, or quite a bit worse, than what their rating would indicate?

[JazzMan]

Re: Rookies that are playing better/worse than their ratings

Rudy Gobert ain't so bad... Runs the floor well, can finish at the rim. His height already gives him a rebounding advantage over others.