Recommended Videos

Collapse

Best roster at the moment?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • robbessac
    Rookie
    • Apr 2012
    • 11

    #1

    Best roster at the moment?

    What is the best roster atm for franchise?
  • Mercury112491
    All Star
    • Mar 2007
    • 7426

    #2
    Re: Best roster at the moment?

    Umm none really. Best bet is to wait a week for Mizzou's roster.

    Comment

    • teeds
      Pro
      • Jun 2003
      • 551

      #3
      Re: Best roster at the moment?

      Or wait for the next hybrid release...

      Comment

      • Dynastyyy
        Banned
        • Jul 2013
        • 156

        #4
        Re: Best roster at the moment?

        None for this year bc everyone has been waiting on Mizzou's roster and noone else created one. I just checked in for the hell of it but with Madden on the way I'm done holding my breath. The 1996 Roster is the best if you like the players of the era. That's what I've been using and will continue to do so.

        Comment

        • thescottyglasgow
          Rookie
          • Mar 2013
          • 175

          #5
          Re: Best roster at the moment?

          1996 is the best roster by far

          Comment

          • WaitTilNextYear
            Go Cubs Go
            • Mar 2013
            • 16830

            #6
            Re: Best roster at the moment?

            Originally posted by Dynastyyy
            None for this year bc everyone has been waiting on Mizzou's roster and noone else created one. I just checked in for the hell of it but with Madden on the way I'm done holding my breath. The 1996 Roster is the best if you like the players of the era. That's what I've been using and will continue to do so.
            This post has false information in it. There is OSFM v1 and v2. There is also OSFM v3 w/pitch edits. And there is Hybrid v2.1a. All of which are decent rosters. In would be more accurate to say that more up-to-date rosters are also in progress.
            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

            Comment

            • Dynastyyy
              Banned
              • Jul 2013
              • 156

              #7
              Re: Best roster at the moment?

              Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
              This post has false information in it. There is OSFM v1 and v2. There is also OSFM v3 w/pitch edits. And there is Hybrid v2.1a. All of which are decent rosters. In would be more accurate to say that more up-to-date rosters are also in progress.
              No, The Show's updated roster is better than the ones you mentioned... To call all of them "decent rosters" suggesting they are practical to put into use at this time is pretty far out... I mentioned the singular major project in progress which the community (myself included) became overdependent on.

              Comment

              • thescottyglasgow
                Rookie
                • Mar 2013
                • 175

                #8
                Re: Best roster at the moment?

                Originally posted by Dynastyyy
                No, The Show's updated roster is better than the ones you mentioned... To call all of them "decent rosters" suggesting they are practical to put into use at this time is pretty far out... I mentioned the singular major project in progress which the community (myself included) became overdependent on.
                Gonna have to agree with Dynasty here. The threads topic is "Best roster at the moment?" He thinks 1996 and I could not agree more. How is his information false when its opinion based. The other thing is if you say these other rosters are just decent then aren't you agreeing with his opinion that those rosters aren't that great.

                Comment

                • lopey986
                  Rookie
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 229

                  #9
                  Re: Best roster at the moment?

                  If you're looking for a franchise roster, I have osfm v2 and I've made all transactions up to date with it. I haven't uploaded it or anything, just using for personal use, but I can upload if anyone wants it.

                  Comment

                  • JMUfootball
                    Rookie
                    • May 2011
                    • 120

                    #10
                    Re: Best roster at the moment?

                    Originally posted by teeds
                    Or wait for the next hybrid release...
                    Does anyone know what the difference will be between Mizzou's upcoming release and Hybrid v3? Is it just the differences in player evaluation opinion from the respective creators? Difference in number of prospects included? Or is one for example optimized for 30 team control - i.e. something gameplay-structural like that?

                    Comment

                    • Phil Parent
                      Rookie
                      • Jun 2013
                      • 492

                      #11
                      Re: Best roster at the moment?

                      If it works on current gen, I'd like to peddle my very own 1994 mod :-) Not claiming it's the best, that would be the OSFM, but I think it's worth playing if you like old-school ball :-)

                      Comment

                      • WaitTilNextYear
                        Go Cubs Go
                        • Mar 2013
                        • 16830

                        #12
                        Re: Best roster at the moment?

                        Originally posted by Dynastyyy
                        None for this year bc everyone has been waiting on Mizzou's roster and noone else created one. I just checked in for the hell of it but with Madden on the way I'm done holding my breath. The 1996 Roster is the best if you like the players of the era. That's what I've been using and will continue to do so.
                        Originally posted by Dynastyyy
                        No, The Show's updated roster is better than the ones you mentioned... To call all of them "decent rosters" suggesting they are practical to put into use at this time is pretty far out... I mentioned the singular major project in progress which the community (myself included) became overdependent on.
                        That's an odd view on it. I definitely will disagree that an SCEA roster (with no real minor league players) could even be considered better than an OSFM base.

                        Originally posted by thescottyglasgow
                        Gonna have to agree with Dynasty here. The threads topic is "Best roster at the moment?" He thinks 1996 and I could not agree more. How is his information false when its opinion based. The other thing is if you say these other rosters are just decent then aren't you agreeing with his opinion that those rosters aren't that great.
                        The false info is what I've bolded above. I am not saying the claim about 1996 rosters is false, but to say no one but mizzou has been working on a roster is just flat ignorant. What about all those roster sets I mentioned that are OSFM-based? If you were reading dynasty with too many y's original post, apparently that never happened.

                        Originally posted by JMUfootball
                        Does anyone know what the difference will be between Mizzou's upcoming release and Hybrid v3? Is it just the differences in player evaluation opinion from the respective creators? Difference in number of prospects included? Or is one for example optimized for 30 team control - i.e. something gameplay-structural like that?
                        It's several different things, some of which you have mentioned. I'd suggested reading the OP in both threads to get a better idea.
                        Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                        Comment

                        • sammy watkins
                          Rookie
                          • Jul 2012
                          • 91

                          #13
                          Re: Best roster at the moment?

                          Originally posted by Mercury112491
                          Umm none really. Best bet is to wait a week for Mizzou's roster.
                          A week? Lol yeah right. That roster is taking so long.

                          Comment

                          • MeLLo33
                            Rookie
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 27

                            #14
                            Re: Best roster at the moment?

                            Originally posted by lopey986
                            If you're looking for a franchise roster, I have osfm v2 and I've made all transactions up to date with it. I haven't uploaded it or anything, just using for personal use, but I can upload if anyone wants it.
                            Would be awesome if you could upload that and post the name on here!

                            Comment

                            • turty11
                              All Star
                              • Apr 2013
                              • 8923

                              #15
                              Re: Best roster at the moment?

                              im so upset.

                              i had a re-rated roster coming out today but after 14 teams it oversaved the default disk roster onto mine for some reason and now im abandoning all hope of getting it done again (granted it would take 2 days max lol)
                              NBA 2k19 Roster and Draft project for PS4

                              Comment

                              Working...