OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WaitTilNextYear
    Go Cubs Go
    • Mar 2013
    • 16830

    #1

    OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

    UPDATE 9/1, 7:45pm

    The final roster has been put in the vault as: OS Realism Roster FINAL. The PSN is ohtheseblues. Enjoy.
    __________________________________________________ ________________________________

    UPDATE 7/16, 9:50pm

    A beta version of this roster is available in the vault as OS Realism beta. The PSN is KeepChooglin. Enjoy.

    See below to refresh your memory on what's inside. The only thing that still needs to be worked on to make this beta version into a finished product is refining faces for teams from the Milwaukee Brewers to the Washington Nationals alphabetically by city name. If you don't mind the Brewers through the Nationals having their original OSFM faces, then this version is complete for your needs and ready to franchise with.
    __________________________________________________ ________________________________


    ETA: The future (near future) -- This will be replaced by a file name and release date in the vault in the future.

    Background and Acknowledgments

    Spoilered because this got kind of long, but this is probably the most important part.


    Spoiler



    What this Roster is About


    Here are some specs (apologies in advance if these don't quite suit your needs, but there is no plan for any updates/changes after release):


    Current, classic, or fictional? Current
    SCEA ratings or re-rated? Re-rated using ZiPS projections as a primary standard
    OD or Updated Transactions? Opening Day w/all injured players in A Ball
    40-man or 25-man? 40-man
    Contracts? Real amounts and years for all MLB contracts according to Cot's contracts as of Opening Day 2015
    Include 2015 Draft Prospects? No
    Suggested Sliders? Worst Sliders Ever These sliders include the best sim settings for manager hook, SP stamina, RP stamina, and injuries even if you don't use these for actual games. **There is no evidence that any sliders other than these affect simmed games.**


    Here are some selling points:


    *ratings based on ZiPS projections and tested to give the most true-to-life sim stats that you'll find in any roster

    *updated ratings that are not in any other roster include:
    -tweaks to minor league pitchers to prevent the league from becoming a pitcher's paradise in later seasons (sim stats are realistic to 10+ years into franchise mode)
    -defense and speed ratings based on actual data, not "feel"
    -new batting splits added based off the 2015 ZiPS projections
    -expanded pitch edits: I've added 20% more pitchers and updated rookie starters since the original pitch edits came out and will update the spreadsheet when our roster comes out
    -standardized pitcher batting/fielding/speed ratings...no more pitchers with noodle arms in the field or some teams with fast-running pitchers that can field and others with slugs
    -updated clutch and durability ratings

    *hundreds of error fixes from the OSFM rosters....corrected spelling, height, weight, positions, audio names (absolutely NO "near" audio matches..only exact sounds), country of birth, handedness, age...no stone unturned

    *a more conservative potential system that minimizes the amount of "A" players in the game and reduces the amount of "B's"...decently heralded prospects all the way down in the C/B range...there are only 2 SP prospects with A potential...a high C potential in this roster is roughly equivalent to a low B in rosters that you're used to

    *thoroughly edited equipment for both major and minor leagues with major leaguers wearing equipment from ~May...you'd be SHOCKED at how many silver necklaces, branded items, and other such items were missing from SCEA players

    *rosters updated to include over 100 players not found in the original OSFM release...from players such as Mike Broadway to Jandel Gustave to Ryan Merritt to Mark Zagunis among dozens and dozens of others...additional players also added to free agents

    *hundreds and hundreds of facial edits (don't worry, not done by me lol) and in some cases entire teams were re-done

    *lineups and rotations accurate to opening day 2015

    *a significant amount of batting stances and pitching motions re-done for minor league players and all MLB players with signature stances/motions have not been altered


    Basically, we envisioned and wanted to engineer a roster that would be: (1) accurate to our standards of OCD-ness that others like us can appreciate; (2) amazing to use in a franchise mode for 3, 5, and even 10 years or more; and (3) something that can be carried over and used for others to base future roster projects on.
    Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 09-01-2015, 07:54 PM.
    Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines
  • Moss44
    Rookie
    • Mar 2014
    • 304

    #2
    Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

    Sounds like a cool roster! A couple of quick questions...

    Did you include any pitcher batting stances?

    and

    Will this roster be more filler-centered like the Revision Roster or prospect-centered like OSFM?
    PSN: Moss394463

    Comment

    • teeds
      Pro
      • Jun 2003
      • 551

      #3
      Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

      Originally posted by Moss44
      Sounds like a cool roster! A couple of quick questions...

      Did you include any pitcher batting stances?

      and

      Will this roster be more filler-centered like the Revision Roster or prospect-centered like OSFM?
      1) Yep, this will be edited from the thread

      2) Prospects have been added that you won't find on any other roster: Rookie Davis and others to the Yanks, Jharel Cotton, Jacob Rhame, and more to the Dodgers, Jordan Patterson to the Rockies, Gabriel Quintana, Auston Bousfield, Duanel Jones, Fernando Perez to the Padres, Brian Holmes, Adrian Houser, and Jason Martin to the Astros, etc.... etc. You get the point. I'm very diligent when it comes to who to include. This is not to say that these guys are filling up AAA rosters either. Players will be assigned to the appropriate levels.

      Comment

      • b22gamer
        Banned
        • Mar 2010
        • 362

        #4
        Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

        j/c are the two A-rated SP prospects Syndegaard and Rodon? Looking forward to this set. I am 5 years deep in a fran w/ the Mets and the rotation, although awesome, is a bit OP. Balance is key with this game, makes it so much more enjoyable.

        Comment

        • WaitTilNextYear
          Go Cubs Go
          • Mar 2013
          • 16830

          #5
          Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

          Originally posted by b22gamer
          j/c are the two A-rated SP prospects Syndegaard and Rodon? Looking forward to this set. I am 5 years deep in a fran w/ the Mets and the rotation, although awesome, is a bit OP. Balance is key with this game, makes it so much more enjoyable.
          Glad to hear it.

          Both Syndergaard and Rodon just missed the cutoff for an A. I have them both in the high 80s POT (Syndergaard is an 89 I believe) and with some decent progression they can easily become A's. The beauty of both those guys is that their repertoires are filthy enough that they'll do ok whether as high B's or as A's.

          The guys I settled on as the only A POT pitching prospects are Lucas Giolito and Julio Urias. Neither is higher than a 91.
          Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

          Comment

          • WaitTilNextYear
            Go Cubs Go
            • Mar 2013
            • 16830

            #6
            Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

            Originally posted by Moss44
            Will this roster be more filler-centered like the Revision Roster or prospect-centered like OSFM?
            The goal is to have the best possible mix of both and it's being done on a case-by-case basis. For example, we aren't excluding younger prospects like Ozhaino Albies and Alex Reyes because of their age. There are also some 29-year-old minor league RPs in there.

            One way you can think about it is...if people want nothing but young prospects and absolutely no minor league depth, then there are more than enough rosters out there to import from. What our roster hopes to bring in addition to balance is some players that aren't in any other rosters yet, which will make the pool of players people can choose from a little bit larger.
            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

            Comment

            • zizzle062
              Rookie
              • Apr 2012
              • 17

              #7
              Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

              By near future do you mean sometime in July? I understand asking these questions are a bit annoying just excited for these rosters and to start my new franchise

              Comment

              • ajc023
                Rookie
                • Mar 2015
                • 165

                #8
                Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

                Originally posted by teeds
                1) Yep, this will be edited from the thread

                2) Prospects have been added that you won't find on any other roster: Rookie Davis and others to the Yanks, Jharel Cotton, Jacob Rhame, and more to the Dodgers, Jordan Patterson to the Rockies, Gabriel Quintana, Auston Bousfield, Duanel Jones, Fernando Perez to the Padres, Brian Holmes, Adrian Houser, and Jason Martin to the Astros, etc.... etc. You get the point. I'm very diligent when it comes to who to include. This is not to say that these guys are filling up AAA rosters either. Players will be assigned to the appropriate levels.
                These prospect you mention im currently working on it.Just curious teeds,wake why not a update roster with latest the transactions.

                Comment

                • WaitTilNextYear
                  Go Cubs Go
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 16830

                  #9
                  Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

                  Originally posted by zizzle062
                  By near future do you mean sometime in July? I understand asking these questions are a bit annoying just excited for these rosters and to start my new franchise
                  Yes, ETA questions are annoying, but I do understand where they're coming from and try not to take it personally. Unfortunately I am not getting any more specific than "near future" and folks are just going to have to keep their anxiety in check. Let's just say that if we had a long ways to go yet, I absolutely would not have started this thread at this point because answering ETA questions is among my least favorite things to do in life.

                  Originally posted by ajc023
                  These prospect you mention im currently working on it.Just curious teeds,wake why not a update roster with latest the transactions.
                  Because we are the ones making the roster and we want it to be an opening day roster. No offense, but we can't be all things to all people, sorry, and obviously our preferences are going to be reflected in our work.
                  Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                  Comment

                  • redsox4evur
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Jul 2013
                    • 18169

                    #10
                    Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

                    If you are looking at real life stats right now one would continue to think that the league is headed in the direction of a pitcher dominant league. At least that's way I am seeing it right now. I'm also not saying we are going back to an era where the leading hitter is going to hit .270 with 20 HR's and 80 RBI's. So why are changing things to make the game different from what it could be in real life. I mean you are seeing guys like Scherzer and Sale both dominating the league right now. Scherzer in a span of time only gave up 1 run over like 34 innings or something like that. And Sale just had a streak of 8 games with AT LEAST 10 K's snapped last night. I mean the top 10 ERA leaders in the whole league with ties range from 1.48 up to 2.40. And the top 25 including ties is like 3.08 or so. And these are all guys with 15-18 games started so they meet the requirements for ERA leader. I'm just curious that's all. Because this seems to be the trend IRL. Not knocking your work at all.
                    Follow me on Twitter

                    Comment

                    • WaitTilNextYear
                      Go Cubs Go
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 16830

                      #11
                      Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

                      Originally posted by redsox4evur
                      If you are looking at real life stats right now one would continue to think that the league is headed in the direction of a pitcher dominant league. At least that's way I am seeing it right now. I'm also not saying we are going back to an era where the leading hitter is going to hit .270 with 20 HR's and 80 RBI's. So why are changing things to make the game different from what it could be in real life. I mean you are seeing guys like Scherzer and Sale both dominating the league right now. Scherzer in a span of time only gave up 1 run over like 34 innings or something like that. And Sale just had a streak of 8 games with AT LEAST 10 K's snapped last night. I mean the top 10 ERA leaders in the whole league with ties range from 1.48 up to 2.40. And the top 25 including ties is like 3.08 or so. And these are all guys with 15-18 games started so they meet the requirements for ERA leader. I'm just curious that's all. Because this seems to be the trend IRL. Not knocking your work at all.
                      I'm not sure I understand exactly what your point is here, but if it's that we should keep the pitcher ratings as is, then you don't understand how bad the sim stats can get in the future of this game. We're talking nobody hitting .300, we're talking every Tom, Dick, and Harry approaching 1.5 ERA's and 300 K's. No, that's not where real life is headed and we've designed this roster to be true to real life while not letting that happen.

                      As an aside, if you look at the stats this season compared to last, we are seeing it level off some. Both runs scored and HR's are up ever so slightly from last year. The median ERA is up from 3.58 last year to 3.91 this year. The league was trending toward more pitching, but that might be stopping...we may be leveling off.

                      Correct me if I didn't properly understand the point you were trying to make.
                      Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                      Comment

                      • redsox4evur
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Jul 2013
                        • 18169

                        #12
                        Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

                        Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                        I'm not sure I understand exactly what your point is here, but if it's that we should keep the pitcher ratings as is, then you don't understand how bad the sim stats can get in the future of this game. We're talking nobody hitting .300, we're talking every Tom, Dick, and Harry approaching 1.5 ERA's and 300 K's. No, that's not where real life is headed and we've designed this roster to be true to real life while not letting that happen.

                        As an aside, if you look at the stats this season compared to last, we are seeing it level off some. Both runs scored and HR's are up ever so slightly from last year. The median ERA is up from 3.58 last year to 3.91 this year. The league was trending toward more pitching, but that maybe be stopping...we may be leveling off.

                        Correct me if I didn't properly understand the point you were trying to make.
                        Yea that kinda explains what I am getting at. And I understand the stock rating are bad but I guess I didn't it expect to be that bad.
                        Follow me on Twitter

                        Comment

                        • WaitTilNextYear
                          Go Cubs Go
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 16830

                          #13
                          Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

                          Originally posted by redsox4evur
                          Yea that kinda explains what I am getting at. And I understand the stock rating are bad but I guess I didn't it expect to be that bad.
                          I also shouldn't overstate the issue. If you pick up the SCEA live roster or an OSFM version, the stats will likely be pretty good for the first 5 years give or take. You might not even notice anything odd. Don't want to scare anyone, lol..deeper into the mode can get a bit dicey depending on your roster.
                          Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                          Comment

                          • CaseIH
                            MVP
                            • Sep 2013
                            • 3945

                            #14
                            Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

                            Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                            Yes, ETA questions are annoying, but I do understand where they're coming from and try not to take it personally. Unfortunately I am not getting any more specific than "near future" and folks are just going to have to keep their anxiety in check. Let's just say that if we had a long ways to go yet, I absolutely would not have started this thread at this point because answering ETA questions is among my least favorite things to do in life.



                            Because we are the ones making the roster and we want it to be an opening day roster. No offense, but we can't be all things to all people, sorry, and obviously our preferences are going to be reflected in our work.



                            So glad to hear this roster is going to be opening day set, its always made more sense to me to do it that way than to update all the moves. I like making those moves at the time they happened IRL in my franchise. Definitely interested now in this roster with it being set to opening day. I really like how you guys have put so much time and thought into the edits made, and the consistency of the roster, so there isn't any bias towards certain teams or players. Looking forward to seeing this once its all done.
                            Everyone who exalts themselves will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted- Luke14-11

                            Favorite teams:
                            MLB- Reds/ and whoever is playing the Cubs
                            NBA- Pacers
                            NFL- Dolphins & Colts

                            Comment

                            • johntait1
                              Rookie
                              • Feb 2015
                              • 116

                              #15
                              Re: OS Realism Roster for MLB 15 The Show

                              I'm really excited for this roster in franchise mode with the edits you have made. Out of curiosity, what would be the best way to edit drafted players so that they don't dominate the prospects in the roster? Also, what scouting method would you guys recommend given the recent thread about how scouting is broken? Thanks for any recommendations.

                              Comment

                              Working...