Hyperbole in ratings...
 

EDIT: AND WHY TF DOES TJ MCONNELL HAVE GOLD LOB CITY FINISHER LMFAOOO

Re: Hyperbole in ratings...
 

Derrick is bricker machine so and derozan is not that good look at PO and his chokes moment when they give him or derrick better shoots they will be unstopable because in the paint they are beast in the game

Wysłane z mojego LG-H525n przy użyciu Tapatalka

Re: Hyperbole in ratings...
 

Obviously I'm biased as a Sixers fan, but I don't see how Okafor isn't an 80 overall consistently.

He's a better free throw shooter/mid to close range shooter than they said, he's not a bad rebounder, and when someone drives at him he's a good defender.

We just played the Raptors, and in that game Derozan showed how good his mid range shot is. Even in the post he can hit fades with ease.

Re: Hyperbole in ratings...
 

I honestly don't like the guy who does these ratings.... Some of them make ABSOLUTELY no sense... prime example of this is D Rose, like you said, his mid range is good, he can hit that pull up. But nah, its in the 60's. And he also bumped Derricks defense down, which if you looked at the stats, he's done a pretty good job on his matchup. I know there's tons of more examples out there haha but whatever man

Re: Hyperbole in ratings...
 

Are you speaking English..?

Re: Hyperbole in ratings...
 

From 16-23 feet Kristaps has a .490 FG%
Dirk is at .459

However from 10ft to 16ft Dirk Shooting percentage is .516
while Kristaps is .352

Derrick Rose from 10 to 16 feet is .583
However from 16 to 23 feet is .267


I think the roster maker is using the FG% from 16 to 23 feet for the rating.

Re: Hyperbole in ratings...
 

Ok? does 27 games outweigh 17 years in the league?

Re: Hyperbole in ratings...
 

Yes. Because it's current version of Dirk. You want historic version, try retro Dirk. It's called NBA 2K16 for a reason.