MLB The Show 16 Roster Update (6-10)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve_OS
    Editor-in-Chief
    • Jul 2002
    • 33995

    #1

    MLB The Show 16 Roster Update (6-10)



    Steve Noah
    Editor-in-Chief
    http://www.operationsports.com
    Follow me on Twitter
  • BigOscar
    MVP
    • May 2016
    • 2971

    #2
    Re: MLB The Show 16 Roster Update (6-10)

    Stanton has naked pics of the developers, no other explanation.

    That Wainwright card is absolutely filthy though

    Comment

    • jfazyankees
      Rookie
      • Feb 2010
      • 51

      #3
      Re: MLB The Show 16 Roster Update (6-10)

      Flashback Chapman literally has the exact same stats as live Series Chapman...

      Comment

      • yankeesgiants
        I Drink Like A Champion!!
        • Feb 2007
        • 2477

        #4
        Re: MLB The Show 16 Roster Update (6-10)

        Is he on the dev team and not listed? Seriously, How is this dude still a diamond???
        Attached Files
        I dont remember there names but they were allot of fun....

        Comment

        • Mercury112491
          All Star
          • Mar 2007
          • 7426

          #5
          Re: MLB The Show 16 Roster Update (6-10)

          I just don't get it. Still no diamond for Cano is absurd. Arod has been hitting well lately he goes down 6. Stanton has been absolute garbage and he doesn't move.

          Adrian Gonzalez is having a decent season. Why does he get the demotion to silver while Stanton stays put playing like garbage? I swear every week half of these updates make sense and give off the feeling there's some kind of weird agenda behind the moves.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • jake214
            Rookie
            • Jul 2006
            • 111

            #6
            Re: MLB The Show 16 Roster Update (6-10)

            Funny thing about Stanton I've played him as a diamond and i still suck with him. I just can't hit with this guy! I'll play Josh Harrison and rake with a guy rated an 80 but Stanton nothing! I think he's still a diamond based off of body of work not the last 200 at bats. This game should be based on last three years statistically and if you pull that sample size from Stanton he's hitting .305 right in line with his 85 contact rating vs lefties. The problem is they don't seem to follow this logic with all players. There should be a formula and attach it to all players. Just my thoughts.

            Comment

            Working...