UT 63-0 Record RUINED

[LEiiZURE]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ks53A7l9PGE

I also make tip videos!

[Haz____]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

Good.

I fought you when you were 10 fights into this, with an 89 OVR, hideous freak looking "Nate Diaz"...

Keep deleting and starting over with boosted stats, to take advantage of low stat players in early divisions.

You're so good.

[Bigg Cee]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

Good.

I fought you when you 10 fights into this, with an 89 OVR, hideous freak looking "Nate Diaz"...

Keep deleting and starting over with boosted stats, to take advantage of low stat players in early divisions.

You're so good.

im 18-3 in lightweight with a 70 Caf and just fought a 89. WTF am I supposed to do. I was so much better then him but his stats were just over powering me plus he was the max height. Ughhhhhhhh. UT is so gross!

[Haz____]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

Also hilarious how all your combos start with body jab-straight spam, yet you're talking about the other player being a button masher....

[Haz____]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

This is also a great time to talk about the garbage match making system.

He is high 80s OVR, 63 fight win streak, and the game matches him up against a 34-35 w/l, 69 OVR.....

SMH........

[Kenetic NRG]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

This is also a great time to talk about the garbage match making system.

He is high 80s OVR, 63 fight win streak, and the game matches him up against a 34-35 w/l, 69 OVR.....

SMH........

UT matchmaking should be by OVR.

[Dave_S]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ks53A7l9PGE
I also make tip videos!

Be thankful I don't put my time into ultimate scheme, it would be my goal to make people that play like you quit.

The dude that ko'd you knows enough about the game to do that, good players rarely get rocked.

You guys that build crazy characters for lower divisions are ruining so many people's online experience.

Nice combos though

[connolls]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

Matchmaking just seems random on UT right now, I fought someone who was mid 70's with a record of 10-2 and I fought them with my WBW that is 88 overall with a record of 907-28. It's boring and unfair getting matched up with people like that.

[whatlez]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

Haha you lost to a bum.

But if he's 89 OVR, he had to put attribute cards on because its impossible to make an 89 OVR CAF with only moves.

[LEiiZURE]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

UT matchmaking should be by OVR.

Im pretty sure i beat gleb earlier. Whats his gt? It was super similar

[LEiiZURE]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

Be thankful I don't put my time into ultimate scheme, it would be my goal to make people that play like you quit.

The dude that ko'd you knows enough about the game to do that, good players rarely get rocked.

You guys that build crazy characters for lower divisions are ruining so many people's online experience.

Nice combos though

I would destroy you lmao. Ranked UT idc what. Play me and see why i beat gleb

[LEiiZURE]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

Good.

I fought you when you were 10 fights into this, with an 89 OVR, hideous freak looking "Nate Diaz"...

Keep deleting and starting over with boosted stats, to take advantage of low stat players in early divisions.

You're so good.

I was and still am a 87 actually. I remember you running away the whole fight and sidestepping into my roundhouses. I pressed forward and Teed off on you like i always do. Stuffing every takedown attempt. Then you rage msged me lmao

[LEiiZURE]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

Matchmaking just seems random on UT right now, I fought someone who was mid 70's with a record of 10-2 and I fought them with my WBW that is 88 overall with a record of 907-28. It's boring and unfair getting matched up with people like that.

Especially because they rage msg you like this HAZ kid did to me lmao, you should see these

[whatlez]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

This guy's broken English is hilarious

[LEiiZURE]

Re: UT 63-0 Record RUINED

This guy's broken English is hilarious

Its the internet, so what if I put "msg", instead of "message"?