Recommended Videos

Collapse

(Point guard) slasher vs playmaker driving into the paint

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FromDownTown
    Rookie
    • Jan 2016
    • 49

    #1

    (Point guard) slasher vs playmaker driving into the paint

    Playmaker penetrate better than a slasher in 2k. They are too fast, too good and finishing more explosive than a slasher even better. This happen too on small forward position ( point forward vs slasher). For example...at IRL, chris paul (playmaker archtype) not so explosive just like what russel wesbrook do (slasher archtype). What playmaker do in real life is passing and find a open teammate. But in 2k they do everything : stand shoot, dunking, off shot dribble. I know its about "speed with ball" matter. I think we need more some balancing.
    Last edited by FromDownTown; 02-12-2017, 10:00 AM.
  • knucklehead15
    Rookie
    • Nov 2007
    • 102

    #2
    Re: (Point guard) slasher vs playmaker driving into the paint

    I think slashers should be more explosive off the dribble .

    Comment

    • ammar_munes
      Rookie
      • Oct 2014
      • 164

      #3
      Re: (Point guard) slasher vs playmaker driving into the paint

      I really want to make a new point guard but I don't know what arctype to select , I like slasher the problem is I think slasher is broken now ! playmaker I already have a shooting guard


      can any one suggest a build ?

      Comment

      Working...