'17 Moonshot HR's

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bcruise
    Hall Of Fame
    • Mar 2004
    • 23274

    #1

    '17 Moonshot HR's

    So....let's talk about this. Based on what I saw from pre-release streams and now my first couple games played, I feel like HR's are traveling far too long on average. Lots of 450+ foot shots, and a few tremendous blasts like my 501 shot with Bryant in my first game. Nice to look at, sure (and to show off Showtrack) but I feel like the frequency of these blasts is going to wear on me quickly.

    I believe these are happening because the new ball physics have "unshackled" the game's fly balls, so to speak. With the huge number of new ways for the ball to fly off the bat, we're seeing carry like we've never seen before in this series.

    So, if this continues to be an issue beyond our initial sample size, let's look into some possible slider remedies. Obviously most people are going to knee-jerk to the power sliders, and I'm certainly not opposed to taking those down a notch or 2. But the one I believe might really solve this problem is Solid Hits. This slider effectively increases/decreases the size of the "sweet spot" within the PCI, determining the frequency with which you'll be able to put a batter's full power potential behind a swing. On default, I feel like we're seeing that full potential too often, and that's what's causing the long HR's. Some tests I did with that slider down at 2 in CPU vs CPU games looked very promising. The CPU could still hit HR's (I believe there were 5 of them in my first game with this setting), but they weren't moonshots.

    Solid hits does affect more than just HR distance of course, and that's where this gets tricky. I don't want to kill off extra base hits for the sake of lowering HR distances, but so far at least I've still been seeing a few doubles as well as HR's. And, since I am actually seeing HR's I know the potential is still there for doubles and triples as well, even with that slider turned down. Lower launch angle + same hit speed = a likely 2B or 3B instead of a HR. The last thing I want is for this to turn into whack-a-mole slideritis where it fixes one thing but breaks others, so ultimately if this doesn't work I'm willing to live with extra-long HR's for the sake of overall game balance.

    The reason I don't want to mess with power sliders too much is that Exit Velo (aka Hit Speed) still looks very good to me. I can barely break 120 mph with Stanton squaring a ball up perfectly. I did a post about Hit Speed last year in the Little Things thread, and it still applies here in '17:

    http://www.operationsports.com/forum...&postcount=169

    I didn't have a whole lot of time to test this out last night, but I'll be playing around with it extensively today. And I wanted to put my thoughts out there to start up some discussion. Would love to hear the slider makers' thoughts on this situation once they get a few games under their belts.
  • Armor and Sword
    The Lama
    • Sep 2010
    • 21801

    #2
    Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

    Right now testing it at 3 and want a sample size. Lets stay in touch on this.


    Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
    Now Playing on PS5:
    CFB 26 Hurricanes/Fresno State Year 2
    MLB The Show 25 - 2025 Yankees Year 1
    MLB The Show 25 1985 Yankees Year 1
    Oblivion Remaster



    Follow me on Twitch
    https://www.twitch.tv/armorandsword

    Comment

    • Aensland
      Rookie
      • May 2014
      • 246

      #3
      Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

      I have to agree, there's way too many no-doubters and tape measure home runs on the default setting. First home run I've seen in 2017 was a 472ft moonshot by Adonis Garcia. I saw Brandon Crawford hit a 470+ft shot on the OS stream, and some guy on youtube hit one over 600ft, which is "arcade-like". Plus the remaining 95% of homers I've seen since started playing have been no doubters, well over 400ft.

      Comment

      • NewNapkin
        Moderator
        • May 2009
        • 989

        #4
        Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

        Yeah, I think this started last year. Definitely needs to be tuned... hope we can come up with something!
        Moderator
        Cubs | Bears | Bulls | Blackhawks | Blue Raiders

        Comment

        • BillPeener
          Rookie
          • Mar 2017
          • 136

          #5
          Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

          I crushed three straight home runs off Kluber with Bryant, Rizzo, and Zobrist. Power is definitely too high. I moved it down to 4 and will test from there.

          Comment

          • bcruise
            Hall Of Fame
            • Mar 2004
            • 23274

            #6
            Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

            Update:

            Unfortunately my above theory doesn't seem to be holding up as well for user vs. CPU testing as it did for CPU vs CPU. Even with zeroing user solid hits I hit 5 homeruns in 3 innings with Boston (2 with Mookie Betts) and all were 450+. It works okay to allow the CPU to hit some normal-looking HR's but it can't stop the user from squaring up the PCI and destroying the ball.

            So the power slider might be the only option after all. It WILL fix the long HR issue guaranteed, but I hate having to move it because it will lower the apparent hitspeed/exit velos. The HR's will look normal, but the numbers will look less than you'd expect relative to how far the ball is traveling. Kinda ruins the ShowTrack effect.

            You can still hit the ball really hard with power lowered if you square up, so I doubt we'll see a huge XBH decrease from that. But I'll play around with it in some actual games to see what happens.

            Comment

            • bcruise
              Hall Of Fame
              • Mar 2004
              • 23274

              #7
              Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

              First game with Power = 2 on both Human+CPU was a positive result. 4 doubles and one wall-scraper HR (Jay Bruce). That's exactly the kind of thing I wanted to see.

              Lots more coming - the bigger the sample size on this, the better. And I don't plan on turning this game off anytime soon.

              BTW, I'm playing HOF default pitching/batting/fielding except for Power at 2 on user and CPU.



              I was the Royals.

              OT - I also walked SEVEN times. That's pretty rare even by my standards - I've rarely had trouble drawing at least some walks in this game every year. It's all about the hitting approach and the willingness to take close pitches or ones you can't cover.

              Comment

              • BrianU
                MVP
                • Nov 2008
                • 1565

                #8
                Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

                Originally posted by bcruise
                Update:

                Unfortunately my above theory doesn't seem to be holding up as well for user vs. CPU testing as it did for CPU vs CPU. Even with zeroing user solid hits I hit 5 homeruns in 3 innings with Boston (2 with Mookie Betts) and all were 450+. It works okay to allow the CPU to hit some normal-looking HR's but it can't stop the user from squaring up the PCI and destroying the ball.

                So the power slider might be the only option after all. It WILL fix the long HR issue guaranteed, but I hate having to move it because it will lower the apparent hitspeed/exit velos. The HR's will look normal, but the numbers will look less than you'd expect relative to how far the ball is traveling. Kinda ruins the ShowTrack effect.

                You can still hit the ball really hard with power lowered if you square up, so I doubt we'll see a huge XBH decrease from that. But I'll play around with it in some actual games to see what happens.
                SDS always puts in big effort in patches, when the initial release settles down we should make a coordinated effort to tell them to look at this it's the only major issue with gameplay imo

                Comment

                • WhiteBunny
                  Rookie
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 332

                  #9
                  Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

                  HR's seem to be really out of control this year. Not only the power, but the frequency. And i have already two grand slam in around four games ( one with Andrew Toles ).

                  Comment

                  • bcruise
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 23274

                    #10
                    Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

                    Originally posted by WhiteBunny
                    HR's seem to be really out of control this year. Not only the power, but the frequency. And i have already two grand slam in around four games ( one with Andrew Toles ).
                    Agree...it's the guys hitting these huge bombs that concerns me. Lots of non-power hitters can hit HR's but they don't often hit them 450+ feet. And I wasn't even swinging power - those were normal swings (including the Bryant HR I posted in Impressions).

                    Maybe with the fly balls unleashed due to physics changes it's time for HR/9 to finally mean something....but that's a discussion for another time.

                    Comment

                    • Steelersfan25
                      Banned
                      • Jan 2017
                      • 141

                      #11
                      Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

                      U got cpu vs cpu sliders or know of any yet

                      Comment

                      • @legendm0de
                        Pro
                        • Dec 2012
                        • 763

                        #12
                        Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

                        This goes down in my book under unnatural contact due to enhancements brought by the sliders, I don't blame the ball physics in this case.

                        When it comes to in-game sliders it's impossible to know without having my hands on the game, which won't happen until OSFM releases. I definitely agree that the most problematic slider however, is most likely not Power.

                        I'm just posting to say, I've played previous iterations with the Power Slider on 10 and still have never seen a 500 ft HR before. This setting (in conjunction with my others) offered so much improvement to past versions for me with ground balls, made pitching a blast knowing the punishment at stake for leaving too hittable a ball for strong guys a added thrill to otherwise innocent fly balls that could have been perceived to leave yard knowing the power capable (It helped me never take pitching for granted).

                        I hope people look beyond the power slider when they want to correct this moonshot HR issue, I won't speculate how to remedy this without having the game but I will emphasize the opinion to look for solutions aside from the power slider.
                        Spoiler


                        What I want to do is go in my PS4 and peel away a couple of examples of HR power with the slider at 10 prior to MLB 17'. I know the power slider will solve this issue but hopefully we'll have an alternative solution to that. In my view, the problem is just some type of unnatural contact and that could be due to any of the batting sliders.

                        [edit:

                        here goes examples of what I'm used to with the power level Max'd out. I'm ambitious to continue having the slider this way with the new ball physics by configuring other sliders that affect types of hitting you see from the game:]

                        Spoiler
                        Last edited by @legendm0de; 03-29-2017, 12:07 AM.
                        Red Legend

                        Comment

                        • alias2191
                          Rookie
                          • Jul 2011
                          • 88

                          #13
                          Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

                          Yea I kinda thought I was crazy Joe panik hit a 498 ft shot off of me using Noah syndergaard.


                          Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

                          Comment

                          • Jr.
                            Playgirl Coverboy
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 19171

                            #14
                            Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

                            I have my solid hits at 5 and power at 4 for HUM and CPU and I haven't seen a HR over 435 feet in 5 games so far. Getting a good variety of hits. This is with directional hitting, however, not zone, on All-Star hitting/HOF pitching difficulties.
                            My favorite teams are better than your favorite teams

                            Watch me play video games

                            Comment

                            • capa
                              Banned
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 5321

                              #15
                              Re: '17 Moonshot HR's

                              One thing that made me nervous when I read about the stadium tagging was would they somehow make it easier to hit tape measure jobs in order to highlight and show off the feature. It sounds like that may be the case.

                              I've seen this in other sport games as well. A new feature gets added and the game tilts in that direction to show off the new animations, functionality, etc.

                              C
                              Last edited by capa; 03-29-2017, 06:52 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...