EA UFC4 meta score

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tissues250
    MVP
    • Apr 2016
    • 1526

    #1

    EA UFC4 meta score

    Metacritic aggregates music, game, tv, and movie reviews from the leading critics. Only Metacritic.com uses METASCORES, which let you know at a glance how each item was reviewed.


    The current score is 79.

    EA UFC3 was 75.

    EA UFC2 was 79.

    EA UFC1 was 70.
  • lahonda
    Rookie
    • Nov 2017
    • 147

    #2
    Re: EA UFC4 meta score

    I think it was a good jump forwards.
    People should anyway start ro have rhey own oppinion instead of talking the same smack like some youtuber that has a community and this community just repeating his words.
    Not offense against our content creators but some guys really dont take the time to experience stuff and also try to learn mechanics.
    He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.

    Comment

    • SMOKEZERO
      Pro
      • Apr 2016
      • 818

      #3
      Re: EA UFC4 meta score

      ^Really? Pretty sure there’s far more jumps backward than forward. UI, Ranked, CAFs, Roster, Ground game, Cosmetics.
      Forward, I’ll give them Standup and Clinch. Then there’s all the things that were just not addressed which are disappointing. With this game having the longest dev cycle, it just feels lacking in so many areas.


      Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

      Comment

      • fballturkey
        MVP
        • Jul 2011
        • 2370

        #4
        Re: EA UFC4 meta score

        Roughly a C+. That seems like a fair score for where it is right now. A lot of disappointing omissions, a few new good steps forward, and some balancing issues I feel pretty confident will be hammered out sooner than later.
        Teams: Minnesota Vikings, Cincinnati Reds, Marshall Thundering Herd, Virginia Tech Hokies (2010 alum)

        Comment

        • manliest_Man
          MVP
          • May 2016
          • 1203

          #5
          Re: EA UFC4 meta score

          Don't forget, you can't post user reviews until 48 Hours have passed on Metacritic...

          Because Last Of Us Part 2 got review bombed by the fans of the series, which I believe will be the same case with this game.

          Honestly reading the first review of metacritic currently, makes my blood boil:

          Spoiler


          I mean who in their right mind gave that reviewer a pass to do professional reviews?

          It does get better than this, it was better than this 8 years and 1 console gen ago with Undisputed 3.

          I am not suprised that all the proffesional reviewers, pay attention to the casual aspects that wear off after a week of playing the game and then the game is dead boring with the new direction it took...

          Somehow those reviewers think that a Sports game is a game where you play it for a week then wait for the sequel...

          Comment

          • BQ32
            Pro
            • Jan 2011
            • 671

            #6
            Re: EA UFC4 meta score

            I mean, I know there was a lot of hate early for this game but to be honest it is by far their best outing yet. Some of you guys just had such a negative early impression you want to just hold onto it without even giving the game a chance and playing the release version objectively. The only thing that really bothers me about this game is the caf hair selections, but I even enjoy the balance that the cafs archetype system has and playing them online has been a ton of fun compared to in the past everyone just having some max size, max stats, max strike level absurdity. The gameplay is head and shoulders above the first 3 imo.

            Comment

            • RollTideRoll0929
              Rookie
              • Jun 2019
              • 330

              #7
              Re: EA UFC4 meta score

              Originally posted by BQ32
              I mean, I know there was a lot of hate early for this game but to be honest it is by far their best outing yet. Some of you guys just had such a negative early impression you want to just hold onto it without even giving the game a chance and playing the release version objectively. The only thing that really bothers me about this game is the caf hair selections, but I even enjoy the balance that the cafs archetype system has and playing them online has been a ton of fun compared to in the past everyone just having some max size, max stats, max strike level absurdity. The gameplay is head and shoulders above the first 3 imo.
              I got a question, maybe you can answer for me......is there an option to turn off CAFs in Ranked mode? I thought I read a while back that CAFs were in Ranked mode and you would have to fight them, and then I heard somewhere else that theres an option to toggle the CAFs off in Ranked.

              Comment

              • the_rainman
                Rookie
                • Jul 2020
                • 24

                #8
                Re: EA UFC4 meta score

                Originally posted by manliest_Man
                Don't forget, you can't post user reviews until 48 Hours have passed on Metacritic...

                Because Last Of Us Part 2 got review bombed by the fans of the series, which I believe will be the same case with this game.
                Last of us 2 got review bombed with POSITIVE scores, too. People made accounts just to give the game ratings of 100, and many of thoses same people review bombed Tsushima with scores of 0. The people who gave it low scores generally did so because the game wasn't that good. Not to mention how terribly Naughty Dog behaved the whole time, they made EA look like saints.

                Comment

                • tomitomitomi
                  Pro
                  • Mar 2018
                  • 987

                  #9
                  Re: EA UFC4 meta score

                  Originally posted by the_rainman
                  Last of us 2 got review bombed with POSITIVE scores, too. People made accounts just to give the game ratings of 100, and many of thoses same people review bombed Tsushima with scores of 0. The people who gave it low scores generally did so because the game wasn't that good. Not to mention how terribly Naughty Dog behaved the whole time, they made EA look like saints.
                  The mental gymnastics are remarkable here.
                  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                  Comment

                  Working...