NFL Regular Season Simulator

[NateDogPack12]

http://clinton-morell.com/n.html?a=-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA_

Hopefully, we can generate some discussion about early predictions, and at the very least some of you can use this to have some fun. Here is what I got.

(1) - Denver (14-2)
(2) - New England (12-4)
(3) - Houston (11-5)
(4) - Pittsburgh (10-6)
(5) - Baltimore (10-6)
(6) - Miami (9-7)

--------------------------------------

(1) - Green Bay (13-3)
(2) - New Orleans (12-4)
(3) - San Francisco (11-5)
(4) - New York Giants (9-7)
(5) - Seattle (10-6)
(6) - St. Louis (10-6)

-The NFC was super competitive, with Detroit, Carolina, Atlanta, Tampa, and Dallas all viable for playoff spots entering the last week of the season.

-The AFC was far less competitive, and many of the worst teams in the league (Buffalo, New York Jets, and Oakland) came from the AFC.

[McMurrayfan]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

1) - Denver (14-2)
(2) - Indianapolis (12-4)
(3) - New England (12-4)
(4) - Cincinnati (12-4)
(5) - Houston (11-5)
(6) - Baltimore (11-5)

--------------------------------------

(1) - Seattle (13-3)
(2) - New Orleans (11-5)
(3) - Greenbay (11-5)
(4) - St.Louis (12-4)
(5) - San Francisco (13-3)
(6) - Dallas (9-7)

[NateDogPack12]

1) - Denver (14-2)
(2) - Indianapolis (12-4)
(3) - New England (12-4)
(4) - Cincinnati (12-4)
(5) - Houston (11-5)
(6) - Baltimore (11-5)

--------------------------------------

(1) - Seattle (13-3)
(2) - New Orleans (11-5)
(3) - Greenbay (11-5)
(4) - St.Louis (12-4)
(5) - San Francisco (13-3)
(6) - Dallas (9-7)

With those records it'd be:

1. Seattle
2. New Orleans
3. Green Bay
4. Dallas
5. San Fran
6. St. Louis

There's no way the sim gave you those standings.

[TDenverFan]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

1- Denver
2- New England
3- Houston
4- Pittsburgh
5- Indianapolis
6- Baltimore


1- San Francisco
2- Green Bay
3- New Orleans
4- Washington
5- Seattle
6- Atlanta

[Checmate101]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

1 - Broncos
2- Patriots
3- Texans
4- Bengals
5- Colts
6- steelers



1. Packers
2- 49ers
3- Falcons
4- Redskins
5- Bears
6- Seahawks

[RoundingThird]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

AFC:
1 - Houston 13-3
2 - Baltimore 13-3
3 - Denver 13-3
4 - New England 12-4
5 - Pittsburgh 11-5
6 - Indianapolis 10-6

Bengals and Jets within one game of Colts for 6 seed

NFC:
1 - Atlanta 13-3
2 - Seattle 12-4
3 - Green Bay 12-4
4 - NY Giants 11-5
5 - San Francisco 12-4
6 - Washington 10-6

Vikings also finish 10-6

I'm going to do this again in a few months.

[NateDogPack12]

A lot of these teams seem to be pretty much the same. Even St. Louis as a riser isn't the rarest opinion. Wonder when someone is going to post their standings with a really unheralded team making it to the postseason.

[SteelersFreak]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

AFC:
1 - New England (13-3)
2 - Denver (12-4)
3 - Houston (12-4)
4 - Cincinnati (11-5)
5 - Baltimore (11-5)
6 - Pittsburgh (11-5)

Indianapolis and San Diego were the only other two that came very close to the playoffs going 10-6 and 9-7 respectively.

NFC:
1 - San Francisco (13-3)
2 - Green Bay (12-4)
3 - Atlanta (11-5)
4 - Washington (9-7)
5 - St. Louis (11-5)
6 - Seattle (11-5)

Chicago (10-6), Minnesota (10-6), New Orleans (9-7), New York (9-7) and Dallas (8-8) were all competitive for these spots too.

Worst teams in the league were the Chiefs and Eagles who both went 2-14. The rest of the AFC East after New England only combined for 10 wins.

[NateDogPack12]

Yeah, the NFC is going to be VERY competitive this year. It'll be fun to watch for sure. With the exception of Philly and Arizona, I honestly think you could make the case that every other team in that conference has a legitimate playoff opportunity.

[McMurrayfan]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

With those records it'd be:

1. Seattle
2. New Orleans
3. Green Bay
4. Dallas
5. San Fran
6. St. Louis

There's no way the sim gave you those standings.

Sadly it did

[RoundingThird]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

Sadly it did

That would mean you had just as many teams with records like 2-14 and 3-13.

[kehlis]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

That would mean you had just as many teams with records like 2-14 and 3-13.

That wasn't the point.

The point is that it gave him incorrect playoff seedings.

[RoundingThird]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

That wasn't the point.

The point is that it gave him incorrect playoff seedings.

I thought he just mixed those up based on records, but then I did my own and saw that it did them automatically.

[Champion8877]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

Ran through real quick, didn't give too much thought on much, so nothing is too out of the ordinary. The only real surprise team I have is KC making the playoffs as a 6th seed. Other than that it is basically same old stuff we saw last year for the most part.

AFC:
1. Denver(13-3)
2. Houston(12-4)
3. New England(12-4)
4. Cincinnati(12-4)
5. Indianapolis(11-5)
6. Kansas City(9-7)

NFC:
1. Seattle(14-2)
2. Green Bay(14-2)
3. Atlanta(13-3)
4. Washington(11-5)
5. San Francisco(13-3)
6. Dallas(9-7)

[RoundingThird]

Re: NFL Regular Season Simulator

Ran through real quick, didn't give too much thought on much, so nothing is too out of the ordinary. The only real surprise team I have is KC making the playoffs as a 6th seed. Other than that it is basically same old stuff we saw last year for the most part.

AFC:
1. Denver(13-3)
2. Houston(12-4)
3. New England(12-4)
4. Cincinnati(12-4)
5. Indianapolis(11-5)
6. Kansas City(9-7)

NFC:
1. Seattle(14-2)
2. Green Bay(14-2)
3. Atlanta(13-3)
4. Washington(11-5)
5. San Francisco(13-3)
6. Dallas(9-7)

KC going 9-7 seems realistic. Alex Smith and Andy Reid might bring good times. I don't think going 9-7 will put them in the playoffs though.