Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

[jWILL253]

The 0-2 Hawks have played two tough road games at the start of the season and are now going up at home against an 0-2 Bears team without Jay Cutler. Not that the Cutler thing matters, tho.

My pick: Hawks 30, Bears 10. I really want the team to finally put it all together for all four quarters.

Spoiler

I got my "PANIC!" button ready in case they don't.

[thaima1shu]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

So uhh...Apparently Kam is in the building

[TripleCrown9]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Kam is back!

Sorry Jimmy Clausen.

[jWILL253]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

......

Well, that escalated quickly.

[ImTellinTim]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Seattle will win this game by about 1,253 points.

[kcharles520]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Don't underestimate John Fox's gameplan. He'll probably run it 40+ times, killing the clock and somewhat keeping the team in the game despite being overmatched.

There is no way they're gonna be slinging it around all game with Clausen. They'll ultimately lose, but you know Fox is going to do his best to not get blown out again.

[thaima1shu]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Both Cutler and Jeffery confirmed out. So naturally it means it'll end up being a close game.

[King_B_Mack]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

No Alshon and no Cutler in Seattle? Good, good. Keep the L's coming. Don't want this team getting unnecessary wins thinking they have something coming at the end of the year.

[ImTellinTim]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Both Clausen and Jeffery confirmed out. So naturally it means it'll end up being a close game.

No it won't. Seattle 0-2 coming into their home opener. Bears have terrible personnel for the defense they're trying to run. Watching Jared Allen try to play linebacker is actually painful. Terrible backup QB without the #1 receiver. It's going to be something like 42-7.

[TripleCrown9]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Both Clausen and Jeffery confirmed out. So naturally it means it'll end up being a close game.

Did you mean Clausen or Cutler?

[ImTellinTim]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

No Alshon and no Cutler in Seattle? Good, good. Keep the L's coming. Don't want this team getting unnecessary wins thinking they have something coming at the end of the year.

Looking at the schedule, we just need to be focused on getting that one W to avoid joining the LOLions in infamy. Could easily be 0-fer going into December.

[jWILL253]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

No it won't. Seattle 0-2 coming into their home opener. Bears have terrible personnel for the defense they're trying to run. Watching Jared Allen try to play linebacker is actually painful. Terrible backup QB without the #1 receiver. It's going to be something like 42-7.

You underestimate the efforts of our offensive coordinator keeping the game close in the first half for no reason.

[thaima1shu]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Did you mean Clausen or Cutler?

Sorry meant Cutler

[King_B_Mack]

Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Looking at the schedule, we just need to be focused on getting that one W to avoid joining the LOLions in infamy. Could easily be 0-fer going into December.

Yeah I'm good with one win just to avoid that mark, but I don't want them thinking this team is better than it is in typical Bears fashion. Pride wins have ****ed this team over far too often. I don't see them getting a win before the bye though.

Next week is their best shot for that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[TripleCrown9]

Re: Week 3: Chicago Bears (0-2) @ Seattle Seahawks (0-2)

Sorry meant Cutler

I was about to wet myself at the thought of Clausen also being out.