Better RB at 100%, McAllister or Gore?

[slickzeus]

here is the video to prove it... watch it at the 2:34 mark you will see Gore #32 tear it up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNlVvkcq8sQ

[kmart2180]

Gore hands down. He has better vision and catches better.

Also if he never got hurt he would have taken over the starting spot at the U over Portis and McGahee. Or at least would have split carries.

[fistofrage]

Why aren't the Mods moving this?

[metallicatz]

With all due respect to Canes and 9ers fans.......i'm going with Duece.

[jmood88]

Quote: Originally Posted by elliottcarbone

Frank Gore of course that is a easy one, why? Because he is more powerful, better runner and holds on to the football better. Plus he went to THE U, the college that has put out more NFL talent than any other DIV 1-A school ever!

I hope you're joking. I actually like Frank Gore but he's not as good as Deuce. It's also hilarious that people are using high school/college highlights as a basis for this. I wonder how many people have actually seen Deuce play.

[jmood88]

Quote: Originally Posted by slickzeus

here is the video to prove it... watch it at the 2:34 mark you will see Gore #32 tear it up. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNlVvkcq8sQ

Why are all of his highlights against the same team? Here's a video of Deuce in the NFL

Quote: Originally Posted by kmart2180

Gore hands down. He has better vision and catches better.

You seem to forget that Deuce played at receiver at times at Ole Miss, he's not needed to catch the ball that much on the Saints.

[ProfessaPackMan]

Laughing My A** Off @ people saying Gore is better because he went to Miami. Funny thing is I don't think there joking either.

[P2K]

100%?

No surgeries or anything happening to either of them?


Gore ****s on McAllister.