Is Brian Dawkins a Hall Of Famer?

[Con-Con]

There are very few FS this past 10 years that have been better than Dawkins. He has to get it if not for what he does on the field but for his influence on the Eagles off the field. You'll prob get a good number of pros to say that B-Dawk should be in the HOF.

[J.R. Locke]

Quote: Originally Posted by Cj7298419

I agree only b/c Ed Reed hasn't been in the league for 10 years yet.

Ed Reed has had a lot more help than Dawkins throughout the years. Philly has had mostly no name LB-DL for years and there defense has been solid.

[goh]

Quote: Originally Posted by Con-Con

He has to get it if not for what he does on the field but for his influence on the Eagles off the field.

Just read an article about that:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=090...=DW_Wildcard_1

[55]

He would get my vote in a New York minute. Anyone who saw him play in his prime would most likely agree.

[Jukeman]

1st freakin ballot, numbers don't lie but they don't tell the truth either

[tmulk]

He is better than Atwater was, he is better than Lynch was, he is a sure thing.

[grunt]

Dawkins is a great player but sometimes defensive backs are judged by ints. I think Rodney Harrison should be considered also.

[Alliball]

It's already been mentioned, but has he really revolutionized his position? He's neither the Kellen Winslow or Lawrence Taylor of his position.

I say he makes it in, but not on his first try.