NFL considering changing OT rules

[z Revis]

Quote: Originally Posted by kehlis

LOL at your logic and debating skills. WE were talking about OT rules (hence the thread title) YOU are talking about the Colts/Chargers.

What? Read some of the responses...I'm not just talking to myself over here.

[kehlis]

Quote: Originally Posted by z Revis

What? Read some of the responses...I'm not just talking to myself over here.

I realize that but your logic for overtime needing to be changed is that the Colts lost...You haven't given any argument other than Peyton Manning didn't touch the ball.

No one else was concerned with what team lost or when they lost...We are telling you to get over it...We are talking about overtime...You are crying about the Colts being eliminated.

[SPTO]

I'm sure if the Colts had won you wouldn't be crying out like this. If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander.

BTW I guess every team that has lost in OT in the playoffs have a right to be PO'ed too right?

[z Revis]

Quote: Originally Posted by kehlis

I realize that but your logic for overtime needing to be changed is that the Colts lost...You haven't given any argument other than Peyton Manning didn't touch the ball. No one else was concerned with what team lost or when they lost...We are telling you to get over it...We are talking about overtime...You are crying about the Colts being eliminated.

I said that it needs to be changed. I want it to be changed. Then I used the Colts/Chargers game as an example. Not my fault everyone freaked out and told me to get over it.

[z Revis]

Quote: Originally Posted by SPTO

I'm sure if the Colts had won you wouldn't be crying out like this. If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander. BTW I guess every team that has lost in OT in the playoffs have a right to be PO'ed too right?

If the Colts won, I'd still be saying that it needs to be changed. I've always wanted it to be changed. I just used the Colts/Chargers game as an example, that's all.

[NINJAK2]

Quote: Originally Posted by juk34man

wats more exiting? A 99 yard return for a TD to end the game or an interception in the end zone to end the game after your team was held to a FG on your possesion while the oppossing team is marching down the feild for a possible 6 points?

Both. The 99 yd TD could come after the opposing team just kicked a FG for the lead with their possession and of course the pick could rob someone of six to solidify the 3 point win.

[Chip Douglass]

Quote: Originally Posted by z Revis

...had it put our offense on the field, we probably would've won.

You mean the same offense that couldn't get 10 yards to win the game?

[z Revis]

Quote: Originally Posted by Olson-for-Heisman

You mean the same offense that couldn't get 10 yards to win the game?

Yes.