Super Bowl 47 will be played in...

[Freelance]

Quote: Originally Posted by mKoz26

Funny thing you should say that. Wrigley field has witnessed the second most amount of NFL games of all time, trailing only Giant Stadium.

yeah, when offensive lineman weighed 180 pounds and didn't wear facemasks.

[Freelance]

Quote: Originally Posted by mKoz26

They would make up for the seating money lost with commercial prices being raised due to projected ratings.

So you think Super Bowl ratings would spike because the game is at Wrigley? Hmmm, ok.

[mKoz26]

Quote: Originally Posted by Freelance

yeah, when offensive lineman weighed 180 pounds and didn't wear facemasks.

So they should have never played the ASG at Yankee Stadium last year, right?

[mKoz26]

Quote: Originally Posted by Freelance

So you think Super Bowl ratings would spike because the game is at Wrigley? Hmmm, ok.

Absolutely.

[jmood88]

Quote: Originally Posted by mKoz26

Absolutely.

Based on what exactly?

[mKoz26]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmood88

Based on what exactly?

You don't think people would want to see a game at Wrigley?

[Derrville]

Quote: Originally Posted by SPTO

Um? How can a stadium that never existed host a SB? BTW here's the capacity: 80,000 - will be expandable up to 100,000 (estimated)

Oh your talking about past Super bowls, i thought yall were talking aobut Future spots. And i know the Capacity.

[wwharton]

Quote: Originally Posted by mKoz26

Funny thing you should say that. Wrigley field has witnessed the second most amount of NFL games of all time, trailing only Giant Stadium.

Makes you wonder why they even built Soldier field... or why every other city made a point to build a stadium specifically for football and stop playing NFL games in baseball stadiums.

Don't know what your fascination is about this idea but it's a really bad one. First, the SB is one of the most watched spectacles in the US and probably up there in the World. If they played it on the moon it couldn't get much of a ratings spike bc the ratings are already so high. Second, nobody would come running bc it's in Wrigley Field or any other baseball stadium. The thought doesn't even make sense. Third, if it didn't matter that there'd be a chance of it being -10 degrees and/or 10 feet of snow then they'd just play the game on the home field of the team with the best record every year. Fourth, it's not baseball... (see the 2nd point).