Los Angeles is building an NFL stadium

[Alliball]

Quote: Originally Posted by kehlis

That was with regards to the politicians not throwing away money for a new stadium which is why the Rams moved out of L.A.

When the Rams moved to St. Louis they weren't in LA.

[kehlis]

Quote: Originally Posted by Alliball

When the Rams moved to St. Louis they weren't in LA.

You knew what I meant and your question still doesn't make much sense with regards to what you quoted especially since STPO specifically referred to it as the LA area.

I'm aware they were in Anaheim after LA and before moving to St. L. and I was pretty sure you did as well which is why I was, and still am confused as to what you were asking.

[yankeesgiants]

Quote: Originally Posted by Alliball

When the Rams moved to St. Louis they weren't in LA.

Technically no. But it's a 30 miles. The Pistons dont play in Detroit and the Bills dont play Buffalo.

[Alliball]

Quote: Originally Posted by kehlis

You knew what I meant and your question still doesn't make much sense with regards to what you quoted especially since STPO specifically referred to it as the LA area. I'm aware they were in Anaheim after LA and before moving to St. L. and I was pretty sure you did as well which is why I was, and still am confused as to what you were asking.

What is so confusing? I asked if moving to LA was even an option for the Rams. Again, how is that confusing?

[kehlis]

Quote: Originally Posted by Alliball

What is so confusing? I asked is moving to LA was even an option for the Rams. Again, how is that confusing?

This is what you quoted. It doesn't at all mention the possibility of the Rams moving to LA.

Quote:

The Rams should've never left the LA area. They were still drawing relatively well but Georgia Frontiere wanted a sweetheart deal for a new stadium. The people of Los Angeles and the politicians wisely decided not to throw away their money but it cost them the team.

You responded to that with this:

Quote: Originally Posted by Alliball

Was LA ever an option for the Rams?

This is confusing because since they played in LA for years before moving to Anaheim (since you want to get technical), it was more than an option, it was reality.

And again, you asked if it was ever an option to a post that never said anything of the sort.

So sorry but I still don't get it.

[Alliball]

Quote: Originally Posted by kehlis

This is what you quoted. It doesn't at all mention the possibility of the Rams moving to LA. You responded to that with this: This is confusing because since they played in LA for years before moving to Anaheim (since you want to get technical), it was more than an option, it was reality. And again, you asked if it was ever an option to a post that never said anything of the sort. So sorry but I still don't get it.

When he made the comment about the people and politicians of LA not chasing the team, me asking if LA was an option was a legitimate question.

[J0nnD0ugh]

Quote: Originally Posted by yankeesgiants

Not really. It would come down to 24 owners voting yes. The 49ers aint gonna happen. The Raiders aint gonna happen an the Chargers could happen.

I'm sure the Niners wouldn't. Crazy Al probably still claims LA as Raider territory.

The point is the Govenor of the entrie state shouldn't be making it easier for one of his state's cities to lose their team.

[kehlis]

Quote: Originally Posted by Alliball

When he made the comment about the people and politicians of LA not chasing the team, me asking if LA was an option was a legitimate question.

Maybe to you, but again I have to point this out:

Quote:

The Rams should've never left the LA area.

As mentioned, Anaheim is in the LA area, everyone, including you, knew exactly what he meant.

Why you are trying to make a mountain out of molehill is beyond me.