I see all the comments on the offensive line and pass protection, but are we going to ignore this?
http://footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol
2nd in the league in pass blocking (before last week, where they only gave up 2 sacks against "The best defense in the league"?
I get it, the Lions OL has been absolutely awful in the past. But Backus hasn't been that bad this year. Honestly, the worst offensive lineman has been Peterman, and that's mainly because he can be counted on to get at least one penalty a week. It's really easy to pile on the offensive line because of the past, but isn't that the reason everyone bashes the Lions already? Because they've sucked in the past?
14 sacks through 8 games is a pretty damn good feat for a team that gave up 43 in 16 last year. They're on pace to reduce that total by 15. 15! I don't think that the amount of times a QB is hit is taken into account in that data, but that's a pretty damn good improvement.
Game by game amount of sacks:
Week 1 @ Chicago: 2, one to Julius Peppers (Where Stafford was injured)
Week 2 vs. Philadelphia: 2
Week 3 @ Minnesota: 1 (None to Jared Allen (Blocked by Backus))
Week 4 @ Green Bay: 3 (1 to Clay Mathews, the league leader)
Week 5 vs. St. Louis: 1
Week 6 @ New York Giants: 2 (One injured Hill)
Week 8 vs. Washington: 1
Week 9 vs. New York Jets: 2
Only giving up more than 3 sacks in one game is a problem? Allowing 1.75 sacks is something that needs to be addressed? Yes, Stafford got hurt on a sack in the first game of the season. He didn't get hurt on a sack in the game against the Jets, he got hurt when he fell awkwardly on the ball. You can argue that the earlier sacks could have led to the injury, but it isn't like the Lions OL is completely sucking out there.
You can also look at interceptions. A lot of interceptions are thrown when there's pressure; Stafford's thrown 1 in 10 quarters of play, and Hill threw 7 in his 5ish games, and Stanton adds 1 to that. Contrast that total of 16 passing touchdowns. That's pretty damn good if you ask me, considering once again where we were at a year ago.
Now I'm not going to say that the run blocking is excellent. According to Football Outsiders, they're 2nd to last in blocking for the run. Can that be improved? Definitely. But seeing how one-dimensional they are in passing and looking at the fact that only 14 sacks have been given up, it's pretty damn amazing for the OL to be performing as well as they are.
Now as for Stafford, I think the injury was a fluke. As was mentioned above in the quote by Schwartz, it wasn't a reaggravation of an old injury so it means that there isn't a problem with a certain part of the shoulder. I feel like if he falls the right way and not onto the ball, this discussion isn't even happening. Everyone is acting like the injury occurred when he got blasted by 2 guys untouched on a blitz, but he simply fell on the ball while scrambling. I don't think that he has an injury problem, and I think that it's just a set of unfortunate circumstances that can go away with an injury-free season.