Week 6: St. Louis Rams (0-4) @ Green Bay Packers (5-0)

[BigBoi23]

Packers coming off a comeback win over Atlanta, St. Louis coming off a bye and rough start.

AccuScore Prediction: GB 34, STL 18

Discuss.

[ProfessaPackMan]

15 point favorite against a team who has had 2 weeks to prepare for us?

That line stinks.

Anyway, just hold off Robert Quinn and Chris Long and we'll be OK.

EDIT: Packers going with the Acme Throwbacks this week. The same ones we played in against the 49ers last season.

[Dirty Turtles]

Ick, I hate those jerseys with a passion. I like the Packers in this one, but the Rams will play this one tough with two weeks to prepare.

[BleacherBum2310]

I know they have had 2 Weeks too prepare.. But Sam Bradford just looks off this year. I think he has regressed some.

I think this is the one game where the GB defense plays a complete game. I'll go 31-13 Packers.

[wwharton]

Quote: Originally Posted by BleacherBum2310

I know they have had 2 Weeks too prepare.. But Sam Bradford just looks off this year. I think he has regressed some. I think this is the one game where the GB defense plays a complete game. I'll go 31-13 Packers.

Been watching games or looking at stats? Bradford's looked every bit the up and coming QB they claim him to be from what I've seen. He's had no time to throw and still thrown balls on the money, with guys literally dropping balls that hit them right in the hands left and right.

[BleacherBum2310]

Quote: Originally Posted by wwharton

Been watching games or looking at stats? Bradford's looked every bit the up and coming QB they claim him to be from what I've seen. He's had no time to throw and still thrown balls on the money, with guys literally dropping balls that hit them right in the hands left and right.

I've looked at Stats. and Talked to a few friends of mine who are Rams Fans.

The regressed part is probably a little pre-mature given what he has in front of him.

[wwharton]

Quote: Originally Posted by BleacherBum2310

I've looked at Stats. and Talked to a few friends of mine who are Rams Fans. The regressed part is probably a little pre-mature given what he has in front of him.

Don't listen to your friends. Don't mean to generalize but too many people see bad passing games or offensive games and blame it on the QB. Bradford's played PHI, NYG, and BAL (traditionally good to great defenses) and WAS (D looks damn good so far this year). Most of those have been without Jackson and all without the top 2 WRs from last year.

I'm not a Rams fan but I watched all of the games against the Giants (MNF), Ravens and Skins (both local for me) and the kid's got all the talent in the world. I felt bad for him. His line is bad, the running game is nonexistant without Jackson, and the WRs and TEs seem to drop every other pass.

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

I think Bradford was just overrated in his rookie season personally. This year people are realizing that he wasn't an all-time great rookie like a lot of people claimed.

Packers should win this game easily.