If the Colts and Packers played 100 times, could the Colts win once?

[ProfessaPackMan]

Of course there is

I'm being called arrogant and ignorant because of MY opinion and yet when I changed it, I'm STILL being ignorant and arrogant

[areobee401]

Quote: Originally Posted by ProfessaPackMan

Of course there is I'm being called arrogant and ignorant because of MY opinion and yet when I changed it, I'm STILL being ignorant and arrogant

I can only speak for myself. I feel that your opinion is ignorant and arrogant. Based off of your post throughout OS I know your not that guy. Honestly I want the Packers to go undefeated until the Super Bowl. I'd love the Pats(if they somehow make it) to face GB and have a shot to break the unbeaten season.

[roadman]

Quote: Originally Posted by areobee401

There is no opinion being based at all. The fact is that thinking any NFL team would be another 100 out of 100 times is asinine.

He's changed his opinion, plus, I don't know how he voted on the poll, but there are 4 or 5 others who thought the way Pack thought before.

I could maybe see if there was only 1 vote up there.

Edit--Aw, heck, I saw your post above after I clicked post reply button. Understood.

[ProfessaPackMan]

I can respect that, Aero.

Do I feel that I was being ignorant or arrogant? No I don't because that's how I(Packman)feel(or did feel). Was actually surprised a thread was made about it because I've said worse/crazy/ridiculous stuff than that and not a peep was made LOL.

Do I think the posts I read about Tebow and "how he wills his team to win" and the "POWER OF TEBOW" are arrogant and ignorant because it's as if people are giving him FULL credit for a TEAM win? No I don't. It's ridiculous to even insinuate it but I don't think it's ignorant nor is it arrogant.(For the record, I am not comparing the two but stating how ridiculous those comments are as much as mine was)

[rangerrick012]

Quote: Originally Posted by ProfessaPackMan

Do I feel that I was being ignorant or arrogant? No I don't because that's how I(Packman)feel(or did feel). Was actually surprised a thread was made about it because I've said worse/crazy/ridiculous stuff than that and not a peep was made LOL.

FWIW my intention wasn't to point you out specifically, since you weren't the only one that I recall saying that in that thread. I also don't think believing it makes you arrogant or ignorant...just think that rationally speaking it's hard to see any team winning 100x out of 100 over another. Doesn't mean I think the Packers are any less great or the Colts are any less horrible than their record indicates.

[CM Hooe]

Assuming all of the 100 games are independent instances (same players at the same performance level, same coaching staffs, no injuries carrying over between games, etc. etc.; basically hold as much constant as possible), I can't fathom a scenario in which the 2011 Colts beat the 2011 Packers even once.

That's more a testament to the Colts being a really bad football team than the Packers being a collection of all-time greats. I mean, throw out all the hypotheticals, what sort of gameplan could the Colts employ to beat the Packers, and with what personnel do they execute it with?

Yeah, "any given Sunday", 21-game win streak playing against different teams over the course of a brutal football season being the longest win streak ever, and so on and so on, but again, exactly how do the Colts beat the Packers even once, assuming each of the 100 times they line up it is as if the two teams are meeting this Sunday?

[z Revis]

In my opinion I do think it is arrogant and ignorant to think a team would beat another team 100 straight times. I don't know how you could possibly come to that conclusion being completely rational.

[z Revis]

Quote: Originally Posted by CHooe

Assuming all of the 100 games are independent instances (same players at the same performance level, same coaching staffs, no injuries carrying over between games, etc. etc.; basically hold as much constant as possible), I can't fathom a scenario in which the 2011 Colts beat the 2011 Packers even once.

What do you mean same players at the same performance level? You mean the performance the Colts were putting out earlier this year or when they quit? LOL. Now we're getting too many if's. A players performance changes every game.