Home

Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

This is a discussion on Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0) within the Pro Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-13-2015, 04:47 PM   #17
MVP
 
mestevo's Arena
 
OVR: 33
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 19,579
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jWILL253
Offensive line was terrible.

Secondary was terrible.

Playcalling was terrible.

**** Kam Chancellor right now.
Is 'pay' a censored word now or....?
mestevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 04:48 PM   #18
Why Not Us?
 
The_Wise_One's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,636
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Good game from the Rams. They deserved to win. Shotgun run for Lynch on 4th and short. Not sure why that's called. Offensive line was miserable. Very little pass rush.

I may have been stubborn with my judgment of Kams importance. There was no presence on the second level run support.

Now we get a pissed off Green Bay team on the road. Sigh.
__________________
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
MISSOURI TIGERS
CHELSEA FC
The_Wise_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 04:51 PM   #19
All Star
 
PeoplesChampGB's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: May 2012
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

I'm not trying to troll when i say this but Chancellor isn't the reason you gave up 34 points. You can be mad that he's holding out, but your defense should've played better and you offensive playcalling was bad.
PeoplesChampGB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 04:56 PM   #20
Why Not Us?
 
The_Wise_One's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,636
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeoplesChampGB
I'm not trying to troll when i say this but Chancellor isn't the reason you gave up 34 points. You can be mad that he's holding out, but your defense should've played better and you offensive playcalling was bad.

Running backs don't do what Cunningham did today on a regular basis against us. Kam is basically a fourth linebacker a lot of the time. So yes he would have made a big difference in the running game.
__________________
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
MISSOURI TIGERS
CHELSEA FC
The_Wise_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 04:56 PM   #21
Banned
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jul 2002
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

I didn't really look closely at how Cary Williams did, though he obviously made a big play on the blitz, strip and scoop for TD.

But Foles had almost 300 yards.

Didn't see if Bailey had coverage problems on other plays.
wco81 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 09-13-2015, 04:59 PM   #22
All Star
 
PeoplesChampGB's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: May 2012
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Wise_One
Running backs don't do what Cunningham did today on a regular basis against us. Kam is basically a fourth linebacker a lot of the time. So yes he would have made a big difference in the running game.
That's fine. All I am saying is if you are blaming chancellor for this loss then your team is paying the wrong people.
PeoplesChampGB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 05:00 PM   #23
Why Not Us?
 
The_Wise_One's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,636
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wco81
I didn't really look closely at how Cary Williams did, though he obviously made a big play on the blitz, strip and scoop for TD.



But Foles had almost 300 yards.



Didn't see if Bailey had coverage problems on other plays.

Williams was a little shaky, but not awful. Ear Thomas didn't look 100% which he wasn't. Snead made a fair amount of mistakes. Sherman was solid. He actually played in the slot a lot which I'd never seen before.

KJ and Wagner had a lot of trouble covering backs/TE today.
__________________
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
MISSOURI TIGERS
CHELSEA FC
The_Wise_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 05:01 PM   #24
Banned
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jul 2002
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Cunningham only had 45 yards on 16 carries for a 2.8 avg.

He had some big plays in the passing game, 4 receptions for 77 yards including a 42-yard gain.

Maybe Chancellor was missed more in coverage, with the Rams TEs getting 7 catches for 127 yards and a 37 yard TD.
wco81 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 AM.
Top -