Home

Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

This is a discussion on Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0) within the Pro Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-13-2015, 05:29 PM   #33
All Star
 
PeoplesChampGB's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: May 2012
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jWILL253
What a trade off.

We trade for one of the best tight ends in football top help one of the best young QBs in football in red zone situations.

And now, since we traded away our best lineman, our offensive line can't give Wilson or Lynch enough time for any of it to matter.
Thats what i thought when they announced the trade. i wouldve never traded one of my best olineman (and not replaced him) for a tight end.
PeoplesChampGB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 05:33 PM   #34
Banned
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jul 2002
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Too early to see how that trade will turn out.

Graham may have made a business decision on a pass near the end zone, which he reached up for with only one hand.

Then a couple of plays later, on a blitz, he beat the safety for a TD one on one.

Michael Robinson seems to have a lot of faith on Tom Cable so if like the Patriots they can make no-name linemen block just enough, out of the spread like the Pats were doing the other night, it could work out.
wco81 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 05:39 PM   #35
Bamma
 
ProfessaPackMan's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC/MD
Posts: 63,575
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jWILL253
What a trade off.

We trade for one of the best tight ends in football top help one of the best young QBs in football in red zone situations.

And now, since we traded away our best lineman, our offensive line can't give Wilson or Lynch enough time for any of it to matter.
I got a follower on Twitter(who posts here BTW)that seems to think you'll guys will be fine and running thru the league for years to come even with a bad O-Line.

Caught bits and pieces of the game but was the line responsible for all 6 sacks or was some of that on Wilson?
__________________
#RespectTheCulture
ProfessaPackMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 09-13-2015, 05:41 PM   #36
Why Not Us?
 
The_Wise_One's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,636
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jWILL253
What a trade off.

We trade for one of the best tight ends in football top help one of the best young QBs in football in red zone situations.

And now, since we traded away our best lineman, our offensive line can't give Wilson or Lynch enough time for any of it to matter.

Sometimes I feel like the front office thought to themselves "screw it, we've got the most elusive QB in the league and a running back that always breaks the first tackle. We don't need an amazing O-line."
__________________
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
MISSOURI TIGERS
CHELSEA FC
The_Wise_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 05:42 PM   #37
You know why I'm here...
 
jWILL253's Arena
 
OVR: 25
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,625
Blog Entries: 9
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProfessaPackMan
I got a follower on Twitter(who posts here BTW)that seems to think you'll guys will be fine and running thru the league for years to come even with a bad O-Line.

Caught bits and pieces of the game but was the line responsible for all 6 sacks or was some of that on Wilson?
I'll say this much about Wilson's performance with the oline in general: he holds the ball for way too long sometimes. So, with that said, I say two or three of those 6 sacks are on him.

But the rest? He had someone in his face before he completed his dropback. It also led to his lone interception.
__________________
jWILL
jWILL253 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 05:43 PM   #38
Why Not Us?
 
The_Wise_One's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 2,636
Blog Entries: 2
Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProfessaPackMan
I got a follower on Twitter(who posts here BTW)that seems to think you'll guys will be fine and running thru the league for years to come even with a bad O-Line.

Caught bits and pieces of the game but was the line responsible for all 6 sacks or was some of that on Wilson?

I didn't really think any of them were Wilsons fault. He holds the ball sometimes but the Rams D-line is ridiculous.

Aaron Donald is next level.
__________________
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
MISSOURI TIGERS
CHELSEA FC
The_Wise_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 05:47 PM   #39
Bamma
 
ProfessaPackMan's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC/MD
Posts: 63,575
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jWILL253
I'll say this much about Wilson's performance with the oline in general: he holds the ball for way too long sometimes. So, with that said, I say two or three of those 6 sacks are on him.

But the rest? He had someone in his face before he completed his dropback. It also led to his lone interception.
That Rodgers' Syndrome right there.

Which I don't necessarily mind because I'll take that as opposed to turning the ball. Lesser of two evils basically.
__________________
#RespectTheCulture
ProfessaPackMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2015, 06:04 PM   #40
You know why I'm here...
 
jWILL253's Arena
 
OVR: 25
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,625
Blog Entries: 9
Re: Week 1: Seattle Seahawks (0-0) @ St. Louis Rams (0-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProfessaPackMan
That Rodgers' Syndrome right there.

Which I don't necessarily mind because I'll take that as opposed to turning the ball. Lesser of two evils basically.
Problem is that Wilson is still early enough in his development that his timing is affected. With all these sacks he's taking, he doesn't want to rush a throw and have it be a turnover. But the flipside to that is he's not taking advantage of whatever open targets there might be when the defense decides to bring pressure.
__________________
jWILL
jWILL253 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM.
Top -