Home

Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

This is a discussion on Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0) within the Pro Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-29-2015, 01:19 AM   #49
****
 
ubernoob's Arena
 
OVR: 24
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 15,523
Re: Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

That was a fun game.

Chiefs were lucky to be somewhat in it at halftime, we should have crushed them with those stat splits.
__________________
bad
ubernoob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 02:25 AM   #50
RF
 
TheMatrix31's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 52,503
Re: Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

The constant ranking and reassessing of players by sports fans is incredibly pointless, stupid, and quite frankly, annoying.

Aaron Rodgers is ****ing insane. No need to go any further.
TheMatrix31 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 07:26 AM   #51
*ll St*r
 
roadman's Arena
 
OVR: 34
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 26,170
Re: Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

Good game Chief fans.

I thought the Chiefs OL was better than what I saw last night, but give credit to our OL and DL for getting sacks and not giving up much on our end.

Last edited by roadman; 09-29-2015 at 07:34 AM.
roadman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 09-29-2015, 08:08 AM   #52
It is now the SW Era
 
muggins's Arena
 
OVR: 25
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Swartz Creek, MI
Posts: 5,379
Re: Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

I only had the game on for a few minutes, but did it seem like they were doing weird **** with the camera?
__________________
Proud member of the OS Bills Backers.

BAD BOYS BAD BOYS
muggins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 09:50 AM   #53
Hall Of Fame
 
areobee401's Arena
 
OVR: 24
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 16,772
Re: Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BleacherBum2310
Super Bowls are a team thing. The argument for Rodgers is his peak.

Why is it ok to credit hockey goalies and pitchers in baseball for team achievements but not quarterbacks? Or on the flip side lack of success in those areas. Pitchers and goalies are constantly judged by their post season record and success beyond the regular season, but when I see the same done to quarterbacks, it's always the team achievement argument. This is not to say I agree that quarterbacks should be, just that I can understand why doing so is valid if we're being fair.
areobee401 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 10:16 AM   #54
Bamma
 
ProfessaPackMan's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC/MD
Posts: 63,580
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by areobee401
Why is it ok to credit hockey goalies and pitchers in baseball for team achievements but not quarterbacks? Or on the flip side lack of success in those areas. Pitchers and goalies are constantly judged by their post season record and success beyond the regular season, but when I see the same done to quarterbacks, it's always the team achievement argument. This is not to say I agree that quarterbacks should be, just that I can understand why doing so is valid if we're being fair.
It's almost the same in Basketball, depending on the player.
__________________
#RespectTheCulture
ProfessaPackMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2015, 10:27 AM   #55
Hall Of Fame
 
redsox4evur's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Boston
Blog Entries: 4
Re: Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProfessaPackMan
It's almost the same in Basketball, depending on the player.
Exactly Lebron was never going to be considered GOAT with 0 championships. If Rodgers puts up numbers close to that of Brady/Montana people will take Brady/Montana because of his rings. He would be considered with the likes of Favre and Peyton. A guy that was great in the regular season but didn't do much in the postseason. And as mestevo said, QB play has a higher impact on team success than positions like WR, HB, DB, etc.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter
redsox4evur is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 09-29-2015, 10:35 AM   #56
Rookie
 
dsallupinyaarea's Arena
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,765
Re: Week 3 MNF: Kansas City Chiefs (1-1) @ Green Bay Packers 2-0)

He won the MVP over Watt last year based solely on the "QB has more impact on the game than any other position." argument but when folks bring up his, relative, lack of playoff success suddenly W/Ls in football become all about the team.


We pick and choose when football is a team game based on if we like the QB or not.
__________________
NFL - Vikings

twitter - @dsallupinyaarea
psn - dsallupinyaarea8
xbox - dsallupinyoarea
dsallupinyaarea is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.
Top -