The Most Important Baseball Stat?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dkgojackets
    Banned
    • Mar 2005
    • 13816

    #31
    Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

    Originally posted by favre4vr
    Sully had the best comment on the thread. Wins is really the only important stat. It doesn't matter how you get there.
    We all know that, but certain paths are more likely to arrive there than others.

    Comment

    • catcatch22
      Or should I
      • Sep 2003
      • 3378

      #32
      Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

      To go off topic for a bit, not sure where to post it. I love these articles man and the way it pops on the frontpage like that. Great reads and informative as well. Keep them coming.

      Comment

      • BledsoeHoF
        Rookie
        • Jan 2008
        • 136

        #33
        Not sure how to quote on these things but.. Ill try .

        There were far worse decisions than that.

        And looking strictly at errors is a terrible measure.
        David Wright is a horrid defender no matter how you look at it. He is living off of that VERY overrated barehanded catch ( not that hard in all honesty ).. His arm is one of the weakest I have seen , not very accurate either and his range is average considering his age.

        All I need is my eyes to tell if someone is good in the field or at the plate.
        http://sports.ign.com/articles/679/679438p1.html

        News Flash for EA employees! It isnt " cool " to wear jeans and a jersey to work or looking like you just rolled out of bed. It shows disrespect for the company that hired you and your co-workers.

        Show some respect.

        Comment

        • dkgojackets
          Banned
          • Mar 2005
          • 13816

          #34
          Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

          Wright is pretty average overall actually.

          Comment

          • Bigtonyclark
            Rookie
            • Feb 2006
            • 74

            #35
            Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

            Originally posted by BledsoeHoF

            All I need is my eyes to tell if someone is good in the field or at the plate.
            Good luck with that.

            Comment

            • SportsTop
              The Few. The Proud.
              • Jul 2003
              • 6716

              #36
              Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

              Originally posted by favre4vr
              Sully had the best comment on the thread. Wins is really the only important stat. It doesn't matter how you get there.
              It was hardly the best. In fact, I'd say it was the most irrelevant in relation to the actual article.

              If you read the article it's about what statistical method is best for assessing player's statistics, and not team wins. Players statistics matter because no team will consistently win with nine Micky Morandini's on their roster.
              Follow me on Twitter!

              Comment

              • Sully
                Hall Of Fame
                • Feb 2003
                • 16003

                #37
                Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                Yeah, I meant it as a more of a joke...

                As for the article, I'm not really sure what the point of it is. Pretty much everything stated is common baseball knowledge. The casual fan will learn more from the posts in this thread than from the original piece.

                Comment

                • Gary Armida
                  MVP
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 2533

                  #38
                  Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                  Originally posted by Squint
                  It was hardly the best. In fact, I'd say it was the most irrelevant in relation to the actual article.

                  If you read the article it's about what statistical method is best for assessing player's statistics, and not team wins. Players statistics matter because no team will consistently win with nine Micky Morandini's on their roster.
                  Hey man--I READ the article. If you READ my post, you would see that. I understand the "point" of the article was to discuss which stat was best. However, as I said in my post there is not just ONE stat. Any person who knows baseball at all, knows that. Heck even Bill James says that. I closed my post with a quick little ONE line freakin statement saying that wins are the bottom line. Like Jackets said, there are many paths to get there.

                  Read my entire post, you know about bullpens and Adam Dunn before you comment on the last freakin sentence and make it look like I don't know what I am talking about...Thanks for representing OS.
                  Formerly Favre4vr

                  Comment

                  • dkgojackets
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 13816

                    #39
                    Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                    Comment

                    • dkgojackets
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 13816

                      #40
                      Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                      Originally posted by Bigtonyclark
                      Good luck with that.
                      Hey, there are only about 15 games a day lasting 3 hours or so each. It's not inconceivable that he watches all of them and thus is able to give us a perfectly accurate assessment of each player that isn't skewed by memory and sample size.

                      Comment

                      • Gary Armida
                        MVP
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 2533

                        #41
                        Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                        Originally posted by dkgojackets
                        LOL. Nah, man nothing to see here. I just won't comment on any of the articles on the site anymore.
                        Formerly Favre4vr

                        Comment

                        • dkgojackets
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 13816

                          #42
                          Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                          fwiw, jokes can be hard to relay over the internets.

                          Comment

                          • Gary Armida
                            MVP
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 2533

                            #43
                            Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                            Absolutely dk. It's all good. It's really no big deal.
                            Formerly Favre4vr

                            Comment

                            • Skerik
                              Living in this tube
                              • Mar 2004
                              • 5215

                              #44
                              Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                              Well I'd say I've come to the conclusion that going simply by batting AVG and HRs is a bad idea, and going off OBP when piecing together a team is a much better option.
                              Man, if only guys like Billy Beane had been around to tell us this stuff 5 years ago.

                              Up next in OS's continuing baseball strategy series: "Which is better, the home run or the single?"
                              Helen: Everyone's special, Dash.
                              Dash: [muttering] Which is another way of saying no one is.

                              Comment

                              • dkgojackets
                                Banned
                                • Mar 2005
                                • 13816

                                #45
                                Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?

                                Originally posted by Tim McCarver
                                One would think that a lead-off walk would lead to more runs than a lead-off home-run, but it’s not true. We’ve researched it and this year a lead-off home-run has led to more multi-run innings than have lead-off walks.
                                OS needs to recruit this guy.

                                Comment

                                Working...