The Most Important Baseball Stat?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?
To go off topic for a bit, not sure where to post it. I love these articles man and the way it pops on the frontpage like that. Great reads and informative as well. Keep them coming.Comment
-
Not sure how to quote on these things but.. Ill try
.
David Wright is a horrid defender no matter how you look at it. He is living off of that VERY overrated barehanded catch ( not that hard in all honesty ).. His arm is one of the weakest I have seen , not very accurate either and his range is average considering his age.There were far worse decisions than that.
And looking strictly at errors is a terrible measure.
All I need is my eyes to tell if someone is good in the field or at the plate.http://sports.ign.com/articles/679/679438p1.html
News Flash for EA employees! It isnt " cool " to wear jeans and a jersey to work or looking like you just rolled out of bed. It shows disrespect for the company that hired you and your co-workers.
Show some respect.
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?
It was hardly the best. In fact, I'd say it was the most irrelevant in relation to the actual article.
If you read the article it's about what statistical method is best for assessing player's statistics, and not team wins. Players statistics matter because no team will consistently win with nine Micky Morandini's on their roster.Comment
-
Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?
Yeah, I meant it as a more of a joke...
As for the article, I'm not really sure what the point of it is. Pretty much everything stated is common baseball knowledge. The casual fan will learn more from the posts in this thread than from the original piece.Comment
-
Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?
Hey man--I READ the article. If you READ my post, you would see that. I understand the "point" of the article was to discuss which stat was best. However, as I said in my post there is not just ONE stat. Any person who knows baseball at all, knows that. Heck even Bill James says that. I closed my post with a quick little ONE line freakin statement saying that wins are the bottom line. Like Jackets said, there are many paths to get there.It was hardly the best. In fact, I'd say it was the most irrelevant in relation to the actual article.
If you read the article it's about what statistical method is best for assessing player's statistics, and not team wins. Players statistics matter because no team will consistently win with nine Micky Morandini's on their roster.
Read my entire post, you know about bullpens and Adam Dunn before you comment on the last freakin sentence and make it look like I don't know what I am talking about...Thanks for representing OS.Formerly Favre4vrComment
-
-
Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?
Hey, there are only about 15 games a day lasting 3 hours or so each. It's not inconceivable that he watches all of them and thus is able to give us a perfectly accurate assessment of each player that isn't skewed by memory and sample size.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?
Absolutely dk. It's all good. It's really no big deal.Formerly Favre4vrComment
-
Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?
Man, if only guys like Billy Beane had been around to tell us this stuff 5 years ago.Well I'd say I've come to the conclusion that going simply by batting AVG and HRs is a bad idea, and going off OBP when piecing together a team is a much better option.
Up next in OS's continuing baseball strategy series: "Which is better, the home run or the single?"Helen: Everyone's special, Dash.
Dash: [muttering] Which is another way of saying no one is.Comment
-
Re: The Most Important Baseball Stat?
OS needs to recruit this guy.Originally posted by Tim McCarverOne would think that a lead-off walk would lead to more runs than a lead-off home-run, but it’s not true. We’ve researched it and this year a lead-off home-run has led to more multi-run innings than have lead-off walks.Comment

Comment