Madden NFL 09 Quarterbacks Analysis

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ceothachosen1
    Rookie
    • Nov 2004
    • 360

    #16
    Re: Madden NFL 09 Quarterbacks Analysis

    no way leinart deserves to be a 85 and how is rodgers rated the same as campbell another thing how is matt ryan rated higher then russell who was the first pick in the draft and a much better prospect

    Comment

    • DJ
      Hall Of Fame
      • Apr 2003
      • 17756

      #17
      I'm a Giants fan and even I think Eli's rating is too high.

      I really like the system used in All-Pro Football, listing the player's attributes instead of just slapping a number on a guy. Players that excel in several areas are noted as such, while other QB's may only be good at 1-2 things, or just average in all.
      Currently Playing:
      MLB The Show 25 (PS5)

      Comment

      • JimmyDeicide
        Pro
        • Sep 2005
        • 623

        #18
        Re: Madden NFL 09 Quarterbacks Analysis

        If they do it similar to NHL then the rookies and younger guys will have a lower composure rating which will effect the players stats on key situations so the overall shouldnt be looked at as the defacto figure. In theory.

        Comment

        • allBthere
          All Star
          • Jan 2008
          • 5847

          #19
          all are way too high. Why is a rating in the 80s bad all of a sudden. Kitna imo should be 78.
          Actually the whole thing needs to be ajusted to the GOAT, not relative to who's the best this year and rate everyone esle accordingly etc.

          imo. there should be 2 ab's in the 90s - peyton and brady - that's it. No one else has shown that they'll be a first ballot HOF. That's what HOF's are= 90s, very very good - great players are high 80s, good players are 70s, average are 60s. Everyone needs to come down almost 10 pts.

          I saw brady's arm strength 99. LOL! his arm isn't strongest in the league let alone close to the GOAT. It would be nice if we could get the ratings back to this planet and down to reality. - maybe then the game would play a little better.
          Liquor in the front, poker in the rear.

          Comment

          • Vast
            MVP
            • Sep 2003
            • 4015

            #20
            Im glad to see Eli's rating up there, but im not sure how it compares to the rest of the QBs. I believe this year we'll see a pro bowl bound Eli. I think the ratings in general are too high. no one should be higher then a 96 imo.
            "I'm addicted to Video Games, and i chase it with a little OS." -Winston Churchill

            Comment

            • swanlee
              Rookie
              • May 2008
              • 419

              #21
              Atlanta this year does not have issues at WR, Roddy White showed he is a legit #1 WR last year, Jenkins is a good End Zone threat, Laurent Robinson came on very well when he was used and Harry Douglas was said to be a steal in this years draft.

              Atlanta has 4 young but very talented WR's. Atlanta's biggest issue when it comes to the QB is O-line not WR's. Sam Baker at LT and Blalock in his second year should improve the o-line

              Comment

              • Matt Diesel
                MVP
                • Mar 2003
                • 1637

                #22
                numerical rating systems are whack. there are so many intangibles in football that you cannot possibly quantify them.

                you cannot possibly set an exact value for an attribute.

                it would be better if they said : he excels in run blocking and is a good pulling guard. give their 40 times and other general athletic attributes, a wonderlic score and leave it at that. part of the fun is finding out who is good.
                Return of the Mack

                Comment

                • Ghettoshark
                  MVP
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 1778

                  #23
                  Kitna should be lower than 80 IMO. He's the beneficiary of a pass-happy Mike Martz offense. His numbers should go way down this year. Remember, he also threw more INTs than TDs, led the league in INTs, and ranked 19th in the QB Rating (despite playing in a Martz offense). That's pitiful production.

                  My Teams: Green Bay Packers, Wisconsin Badgers, Marquette Golden Eagles, Milwaukee Brewers, Virginia Tech Hokies, Texas Longhorns, Houston Texans, Houston Rockets

                  Comment

                  • Postman17
                    Rookie
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 369

                    #24
                    Re: Madden NFL 09 Quarterbacks Analysis

                    I haven't post on here in a while but I agree Eli's ratinging is way too high. It should be more like an 87. A 93, you'd think he was lighting it up all year. Goes to show you in Madden, all you have to do is win a super bowl and your rating is as good as gold. Oh well, I'll take it though. See some of you online in August.
                    http://card.mygamercard.net/Postman+17.png

                    Comment

                    • AC IS ART
                      Pro
                      • May 2008
                      • 708

                      #25
                      Campbells rating is upsetting. His speed is always underated and his throw power should be higher. Im not saying he should be an 87 or above, but he's better than Matt Leinart..

                      Comment

                      • N51_rob
                        Faceuary!
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 14805

                        #26
                        Re: Madden NFL 09 Quarterbacks Analysis

                        Originally posted by AC IS ART
                        Campbells rating is upsetting. His speed is always underated and his throw power should be higher. Im not saying he should be an 87 or above, but he's better than Matt Leinart..
                        Should he be rated higher than Leinhart I don't know. But he should easily be the highest rated QB on the Redskins, and he is not. I am really having a hard time justifying how Collins is higher rated than Campbell. Especially given that this is a new offense for him and it is one that Jason has been in before as far as the basic scheme.
                        Moderator
                        PSN:gr8juan

                        Twitch


                        Finally Access to Coaches Tape! Coaches Film Analysis

                        2 Minute Warning PS4 Madden 18 Franchise
                        Washington Redskins (0-0) Last Game: N/A
                        Year 1:

                        Comment

                        • blackngoldfan
                          MVP
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 1050

                          #27
                          Re: Madden NFL 09 Quarterbacks Analysis

                          Originally posted by jertwa
                          I read that they gave Dennis Dixon a 60 speed rating. I know he tore his ACL, but come on! That's absolutely rediculous! I don't expect his ratings to be amazing, but that should have been one of the good ones.
                          I guess that's punishment for the way he cheesed in the NCAA games.

                          Comment

                          • BledsoeHoF
                            Rookie
                            • Jan 2008
                            • 136

                            #28
                            Kitna should be around 78-80..

                            Delhomme should be 78-80 ( Never thrown for 3000 yards )

                            Alex Smith at 80 is pretty generous and should be no higher than a 75.

                            Jason Campbell seems about right.

                            How Leinart got rated at 85 I do not know. Should be no higher than 70.

                            Rogers at 83 is definately generous as he has done nothing.

                            Matt Ryan hasnt even thrown a pass yet and it rated 83? Please.

                            I think Manning is pretty close at 93 but for me 90 seems about right.

                            Conclusion... Noone at EA knows anything about football.
                            http://sports.ign.com/articles/679/679438p1.html

                            News Flash for EA employees! It isnt " cool " to wear jeans and a jersey to work or looking like you just rolled out of bed. It shows disrespect for the company that hired you and your co-workers.

                            Show some respect.

                            Comment

                            • Chavez21
                              Rookie
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 22

                              #29
                              Originally posted by BledsoeHoF
                              Kitna should be around 78-80..

                              Delhomme should be 78-80 ( Never thrown for 3000 yards )

                              Alex Smith at 80 is pretty generous and should be no higher than a 75.

                              Jason Campbell seems about right.

                              How Leinart got rated at 85 I do not know. Should be no higher than 70.

                              Rogers at 83 is definately generous as he has done nothing.

                              Matt Ryan hasnt even thrown a pass yet and it rated 83? Please.

                              I think Manning is pretty close at 93 but for me 90 seems about right.

                              Conclusion... Noone at EA knows anything about football.
                              Jake Delhomme threw for 3000 yards in 03,04, and 05. He also threw for 2800 yards in 13 games in 2006. He was on pace for 3000 yards last year before he got hurt.

                              Comment

                              • Shadymamba
                                Black Mamba
                                • Apr 2005
                                • 758

                                #30
                                Eli's a 93 i dont know how high you want him yes he won a super bowl but so did trent dilfer lol 93 is fne if he was 80-something then i'll be like wtf and as for the rookies..every year same ol, thats why if you do a fantasy draft just take rookies lol...you'll have a dynasty for years and a real good team madden always does this
                                MLB: Pittsburgh Pirates '90
                                NFL: Miami Dolphins '84
                                NBA: Minnesota Timberwolves ' 15
                                CFB: Oregon Ducks '10

                                I HATE TO LOSE MORE THAN I LOVE TO WIN
                                --------------------------------------------------
                                Twitter: Rileyfcol
                                PSN: Doc_Hollladay
                                Instagram:7_wolfe

                                Comment

                                Working...