Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boregard
    Banned
    • Jun 2008
    • 614

    #16
    Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

    ^ I agree!!!

    Comment

    • Ceothachosen1
      Rookie
      • Nov 2004
      • 360

      #17
      Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

      barber is rated higher then clinton portis which is a complete joke call me when he carries a whole offense on his back

      Comment

      • Sigma4Life
        Pro
        • Oct 2003
        • 740

        #18
        Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

        Originally posted by Ceothachosen1
        barber is rated higher then clinton portis which is a complete joke call me when he carries a whole offense on his back
        LOL, call me when Portis does the same.
        Fantasy football fans... Dominate your Draft with the #1 selling fantasy football app, Fantasy Football Cheat Sheet 2017 for iOS & Android.

        Get it for iPhone / iPad!

        Get it for Android!

        Comment

        • LosWorld
          Rookie
          • Jul 2008
          • 32

          #19
          Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

          Granted, there are always too many highly rated players in Madden. But at this point Barber is a top 5 back in the NFL. Don't take that as a huge deal, as that list changes each and every year with the exception of Tomlinson. I'm sure 3 years ago we would have all liked Alexander on our team. Hell, even Larry Johnson makes you feel iffy after last season. Nature of the position.

          Comment

          • cdronm
            Rookie
            • Jul 2008
            • 3

            #20
            THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU... for pointed out how B. Jacobs got the shaft. #3 in the NFL in rushing yards per/game last season, also had the 3rd best average per carry among rusher with over 1,000 yards last season. That's not worth at least a 91 or so???

            Comment

            • cdronm
              Rookie
              • Jul 2008
              • 3

              #21
              ... "for pointing out". (LOL) My bad...

              Comment

              • jontabs
                Rookie
                • Feb 2008
                • 3

                #22
                Yeah, biggest problem for me would be LenDale White.

                82 for a starter? From a pre-dominantly running team? The stats speak for itself. Whether or not its his style, lack of sped or what not, the fact is, he should be given the rating of a starting NFL running back, and one whose team depends on greatly.

                And he gets shafted by LT'S backup who hasn't done anything the past 4 years, and is going to run behind one of the worst lines in football? True he showed some flashes with one or two carries, but what does that prove? That EA can make up for Vick leaving by giving him an 88?

                Barber I'd give a 90-91 but I can see why they give him a 93.

                Thing is, you give barber a 93, bump up Jacobs to at least 91. Just my opinion

                Comment

                • texbuk84
                  Mercy Extended. John 3:16
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 1277

                  #23
                  Mr. Barber doesnt deserve to be a 93 first of all because he is a cowgirl and secound of all he is overated. Brandon won the Super Bowl and was a great back all year with more touches and yards and his rating is lower than barbers. the people who put the rating's in must be cowboy fans.lol
                  Oakland Athletics/Phillies
                  Celtics FAN/ Jazz supporter
                  Eagles[/COLOR]
                  Devils



                  2kflightschool.webs.com

                  Comment

                  • texbuk84
                    Mercy Extended. John 3:16
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 1277

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Ceothachosen1
                    barber is rated higher then clinton portis which is a complete joke call me when he carries a whole offense on his back
                    exactly portis is better than barber but rated lower. please explain to me the rating system in this game.
                    Oakland Athletics/Phillies
                    Celtics FAN/ Jazz supporter
                    Eagles[/COLOR]
                    Devils



                    2kflightschool.webs.com

                    Comment

                    • a4reak
                      Banned
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 1093

                      #25
                      Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

                      Originally posted by jontabs
                      Yeah, biggest problem for me would be LenDale White.

                      82 for a starter? From a pre-dominantly running team? The stats speak for itself. Whether or not its his style, lack of sped or what not, the fact is, he should be given the rating of a starting NFL running back, and one whose team depends on greatly.

                      And he gets shafted by LT'S backup who hasn't done anything the past 4 years, and is going to run behind one of the worst lines in football? True he showed some flashes with one or two carries, but what does that prove? That EA can make up for Vick leaving by giving him an 88?

                      Barber I'd give a 90-91 but I can see why they give him a 93.

                      Thing is, you give barber a 93, bump up Jacobs to at least 91. Just my opinion
                      Name on thing Brandon Jacobs has done in the NFL to warrant a possible 91 rating.

                      Comment

                      • Chavez21
                        Rookie
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 22

                        #26
                        Compared to Marion Barber's 93 rating, Brandon Jacobs warrants at least a 91. Barber has done less.

                        Comment

                        • bengleu22
                          Rookie
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 47

                          #27
                          Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

                          Originally posted by jontabs
                          Yeah, biggest problem for me would be LenDale White.

                          82 for a starter? From a pre-dominantly running team? The stats speak for itself. Whether or not its his style, lack of sped or what not, the fact is, he should be given the rating of a starting NFL running back, and one whose team depends on greatly.

                          And he gets shafted by LT'S backup who hasn't done anything the past 4 years, and is going to run behind one of the worst lines in football? True he showed some flashes with one or two carries, but what does that prove? That EA can make up for Vick leaving by giving him an 88?

                          Barber I'd give a 90-91 but I can see why they give him a 93.

                          Thing is, you give barber a 93, bump up Jacobs to at least 91. Just my opinion
                          white is fat and slow. good for 3 yards up the middle. i thought they made him too fast as it is. he already has the speed of some corners and wr's, which is a joke. do you want white running sweeps? he doesn't do that because he can't, so why should his rating be higher? he's a one trick chubby pony.

                          i like the idea someone else brought up of average players being in the 70's, good players in the 80's and superstars in the 90's. Neither Barber or Jacobs fall into the "superstar" category because neither of them have ever been a feature back. Barber still won't be with Felix Jones joining the Cowboys.

                          screw it, let's just make everyone 95+ that way nobody's offended.

                          Comment

                          • DC
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 17996

                            #28
                            Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

                            Originally posted by ralphsundin
                            I really miss the days when there were some varying ratings in Madden. Go pop in Madden 2004 (i think this was the last one to have it right). Serviceable players are in the 70s, good players 80s and you had to be something special to be in the 90s. Along came Madden 2005 and all of the sudden players with a rating of 80 are pretty much the worst starters on your team. A guy with a rating of 75...no chance he sees the field.
                            That sports games in general. EVERYONE is overrated in every game.
                            Especially the superstars.
                            Concrete evidence/videos please

                            Comment

                            • BezO
                              MVP
                              • Jul 2004
                              • 4414

                              #29
                              Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

                              Lowering Barber's speed would lower his overall. Despite being one of the slowest tailbacks in the league, he has a 90+ speed rating, I guess because EA hasn't figured out how to make slower backs good, without inflating their speed.

                              But I don't have a problem with Barber's 93 overall. He's definitely one of the best backs in the league. What rating would you lower because he didn't cary the full load? You can't lower his physical skills because he didn't play ever down. Maybe putting his endurance in check would balance him out so you couldn't give him 30 carries a game. But the only other rating I would lower is his speed.

                              I think Jacobs is about right. Not to knock him, but he gets a lot of yards simply because defenders are scared to tackle him. Looking at his individual ratings, I'm not sure where he could be improved. Comparing him to Barber, I would only give him the edge in speed, and maybe strength.
                              Shout out to The Watcher! Where you at bruh?

                              Comment

                              • Nza
                                MVP
                                • Jan 2004
                                • 3437

                                #30
                                Re: Madden NFL 09 RB Ratings Analysis

                                Originally posted by bengleu22
                                white is fat and slow. good for 3 yards up the middle. i thought they made him too fast as it is. he already has the speed of some corners and wr's, which is a joke. do you want white running sweeps? he doesn't do that because he can't, so why should his rating be higher? he's a one trick chubby pony.

                                i like the idea someone else brought up of average players being in the 70's, good players in the 80's and superstars in the 90's. Neither Barber or Jacobs fall into the "superstar" category because neither of them have ever been a feature back. Barber still won't be with Felix Jones joining the Cowboys.

                                screw it, let's just make everyone 95+ that way nobody's offended.
                                Whilst I agree with a lot of that, I feel 82 is still too low. I think around 85, 86 would be more intune with his season last year, which wasn't bad considering he played most of the year with a semi-serious knee injury. More awareness would be in order IMO as he does have good vision.

                                Comment

                                Working...