Why I Have Not Made the Leap To Online

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Methlab
    MVP
    • Oct 2003
    • 2384

    #16
    I love some online games a lot. For example, Call Of Duty is an incredibly fun game to play online. Factor in the with the Fall update, we will be able to ignore the chatter of everyone but our group of friends and form our own rooms to talk in while playing, and you have a really nice experience void of children who say N and F every 3 seconds because Mommy is not home.

    Also, let me add that a major issue with an online sports game is the duration. This is why I believe FIFA soccer will only get more popular if the playablity gets better. It is not a long investment of time to get a game in.

    Madden and NBA games are LONG. If you have a cheeser on the other end, you have just locked yourself into committing possibly an hour to playing this person.

    I realized this last night when I got Soul Caliber. What a great game for online!! It's maybe the best online game possible because it's just like when you were a kid at the arcade. Some random guy steps up and plays you and the loser sits back in line. Plus, a fight takes 5 minutes or so. It's a minimum commitmentl. A PERFECT game for online. Not much cheese at all, if any, and a ranking system that is addictive and keeps you wanting just one more game.

    I upset a level 3 guy my second game and it gave me extra points and got me fired up. Things like that keep me online.

    Comment

    • DJ
      Hall Of Fame
      • Apr 2003
      • 17756

      #17
      I'm an offline gamer, too. I tried online but it wasn't for me. Glad to hear I'm not the only one out there.
      Currently Playing:
      MLB The Show 25 (PS5)

      Comment

      • CMH
        Making you famous
        • Oct 2002
        • 26203

        #18
        Re: Why I Have Not Made the Leap To Online

        Originally posted by rsnomar05
        I'm going to offer some constructive criticism..
        I generally don't like commenting in my own articles because I shouldn't have to explain anything. I also prefer that readers perceive the piece the way they want to. You get what you want out of it.

        I just wanted to point out that I do appreciate the feedback. And you're right, to a point, that this is something that could have been done in a thread with one sentence. "I don't play online because I like playing against the CPU and I don't really even have the time to play in online leagues."

        This article, however, while written from my perspective is to open commentary on why other gamers have not made that leap. I'm telling you exactly my reasons and even explaining them a bit. Now, it's your turn. Now, you can read this and say, "Wow, I'm not the only one that feels the same exact way. Great to know that there is someone else out there like me when it comes to offline vs. online."

        Or maybe you'll say, "Those are not the best of reasons to avoid online. Here's what you can do."

        edit:

        As for your time argument. I'm not sure if perhaps I wasn't clear enough but I did round out that reasoning by stating I don't want to be that gamer that makes an online league wait. By time, I meant scheduling myself to a dedicated time slot for online gaming. And the only reason someone would be scheduled to play online is to play a game in their online league. I think that makes the point valid while not discrediting the others.
        Last edited by CMH; 07-30-2008, 03:24 PM.
        "It may well be that we spectators, who are not divinely gifted as athletes, are the only ones able to truly see, articulate and animate the experience of the gift we are denied. And that those who receive and act out the gift of athletic genius must, perforce, be blind and dumb about it -- and not because blindness and dumbness are the price of the gift, but because they are its essence." - David Foster Wallace

        "You'll not find more penny-wise/pound-foolish behavior than in Major League Baseball." - Rob Neyer

        Comment

        • bigfnjoe96
          Hall Of Fame
          • Feb 2004
          • 11410

          #19
          Get with the times there YP... j/k

          Comment

          • rsnomar05
            MVP
            • Dec 2003
            • 3662

            #20
            Re: Why I Have Not Made the Leap To Online

            Originally posted by YankeePride
            I generally don't like commenting in my own articles because I shouldn't have to explain anything. I also prefer that readers perceive the piece the way they want to. You get what you want out of it.

            I just wanted to point out that I do appreciate the feedback. And you're right, to a point, that this is something that could have been done in a thread with one sentence. "I don't play online because I like playing against the CPU and I don't really even have the time to play in online leagues."

            This article, however, while written from my perspective is to open commentary on why other gamers have not made that leap. I'm telling you exactly my reasons and even explaining them a bit. Now, it's your turn. Now, you can read this and say, "Wow, I'm not the only one that feels the same exact way. Great to know that there is someone else out there like me when it comes to offline vs. online."

            Or maybe you'll say, "Those are not the best of reasons to avoid online. Here's what you can do."

            edit:

            As for your time argument. I'm not sure if perhaps I wasn't clear enough but I did round out that reasoning by stating I don't want to be that gamer that makes an online league wait. By time, I meant scheduling myself to a dedicated time slot for online gaming. And the only reason someone would be scheduled to play online is to play a game in their online league. I think that makes the point valid while not discrediting the others.
            If it was to be used to open commentary, than that is another story completely. I think the commentary aspect should have been mentioned, or made more clear. When I read the article, I though it was just one person writing why they don't play online (without making an argument as to why a person should or should not), but the purpose of the article changes completely when put in a new context (trying to open up dialogue/commentary).

            I also apologize if the feedback came off as too negative. I was trying to be helpful.

            Comment

            • CaptainZombie
              Brains
              • Jul 2003
              • 37851

              #21
              Re: Why I Have Not Made the Leap To Online

              Nice write up Carlos and don't worry about what rs said about the article.
              HDMovie Room

              Comment

              • RaychelSnr
                Executive Editor
                • Jan 2007
                • 4845

                #22
                Originally posted by YankeePride
                I generally don't like commenting in my own articles because I shouldn't have to explain anything. I also prefer that readers perceive the piece the way they want to. You get what you want out of it.

                I just wanted to point out that I do appreciate the feedback. And you're right, to a point, that this is something that could have been done in a thread with one sentence. "I don't play online because I like playing against the CPU and I don't really even have the time to play in online leagues."

                This article, however, while written from my perspective is to open commentary on why other gamers have not made that leap. I'm telling you exactly my reasons and even explaining them a bit. Now, it's your turn. Now, you can read this and say, "Wow, I'm not the only one that feels the same exact way. Great to know that there is someone else out there like me when it comes to offline vs. online."

                Or maybe you'll say, "Those are not the best of reasons to avoid online. Here's what you can do."

                edit:

                As for your time argument. I'm not sure if perhaps I wasn't clear enough but I did round out that reasoning by stating I don't want to be that gamer that makes an online league wait. By time, I meant scheduling myself to a dedicated time slot for online gaming. And the only reason someone would be scheduled to play online is to play a game in their online league. I think that makes the point valid while not discrediting the others.
                Thought I would highlight the third paragraph of this and comment on it. We generally write articles in a few molds and one is to just basically open up discussion on a certain topic. This article is one of them. While we appreciate the feedback and are continually working to improve our content writing for an English major and writing for a website such as Operation Sports are two completely different animals.

                Switching gears, I think I have a very unique perspective to offer. I love playing head to head in king of the couch kind of battles but I don't usually venture online with sports titles. Like Carlos my time with any one game is limited and I do what I enjoy most with games and that is playing franchise mode and trying to build up a team through that. However, other games such as Call of Duty 4, I have put many multiples of times more play time into that game online than I have offline. I guess I'm a living hypocrite in that regard
                OS Executive Editor
                Check out my blog here at OS. Add me on Twitter.

                Comment

                • CMH
                  Making you famous
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 26203

                  #23
                  Re: Why I Have Not Made the Leap To Online

                  Originally posted by GeonosisX
                  Nice write up Carlos and don't worry about what rs said about the article.
                  Haha. You guys make it seem like he hurt my feelings.

                  I really appreciate his criticism. I wasn't offended in anyway. I think he brought up a good point and whether or not it mattered in regards to this article, it matters in regards to writing and that's something I'll take with me in the future.
                  "It may well be that we spectators, who are not divinely gifted as athletes, are the only ones able to truly see, articulate and animate the experience of the gift we are denied. And that those who receive and act out the gift of athletic genius must, perforce, be blind and dumb about it -- and not because blindness and dumbness are the price of the gift, but because they are its essence." - David Foster Wallace

                  "You'll not find more penny-wise/pound-foolish behavior than in Major League Baseball." - Rob Neyer

                  Comment

                  • Ruffy
                    MVP
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 1516

                    #24
                    Re: Why I Have Not Made the Leap To Online

                    Originally posted by YankeePride
                    Haha. You guys make it seem like he hurt my feelings.

                    I really appreciate his criticism. I wasn't offended in anyway. I think he brought up a good point and whether or not it mattered in regards to this article, it matters in regards to writing and that's something I'll take with me in the future.
                    I agree with some of his criticism in a lot of "articles" are not articles but commentary or opinions....which is fine....alot of threads in the forums are started with a commentary just like that one....which I do enjoy reading.

                    No reason to bash either guy.

                    Instead of articles you guys should all be referred to as columnists......writing a column has the oportunity to be full of opinions and fun stuff....just a suggestion.

                    Either way content is a good thing.

                    I agree the shift to online only for some things is alarming...although NHL 08 was the 1st sports game I strictly played online....sure I encounter a dozen cheats but i just quit and started up again....i played over 500 online games which shocked the hell out of me...i had more wins than losses but i got nailed with a loss alot becuase I'd just quit the second i realized i was playing a cheat in the top 100.

                    I like some of the things online has brought.....being able to stay in touch with friends who went I went to University with and spent many late nights playing seasons and franchises with....being able to meet online and do that again is what is fun for me so i do enjoy that.

                    I could care less about the rankings and the leaderboards and think alot of that stuff should be done away with.

                    I prefer to play most of my sports games offline...I can tweak the sliders so that the comp can just as easily whoop my azz if im not playing well.....like MLB the Show..

                    I almost never play madden or ncaa online against someone I don't know or have met.

                    As for OS its a great place to get online with people that want some good fun...realism and comradary and the likes...

                    A great example is the Monday Night Hot Shots Golf 4 league Im in with a bunch of OSer...we all have different skill levels but its alot of fun to get online and goof off....witnessing great and bad shots....and really giving a game alot of replay value....I definately lookforward to the Monday night meetups.

                    But in the end its do what makes you happy...offline or offline.
                    Former Bison, Argonaut, TSN and Sportsnet employee.
                    Gaming since the days of the NES, Atari and Intellivision.
                    Lifelong Hartford Whaler fan.

                    Comment

                    • GiantBlue76
                      Banned
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 3287

                      #25
                      I'm not going to criticize anyone because everyone has their own tastes. I'm 32 years old and have been playing sports video games since the atari 2600. I had every madden up until 2001 when the series really took a turn for the worst. I also had all of EA's other GREAT sports games, like the old NHL and NBA games for the sega genesis. The concept of sports gaming online was awesome to me. I have zero desire to play the computer. I am not interested in a role playing game when I am competing. I could give a **** less about setting hot dog prices and ticket prices. I have been an athlete my whole life so I love to compete. The whole point to a sports game is to be able to pit yourself against an unpredictable opponent and try to win a championship. Playing the computer gets stale and is unfulfilling. Why is it fun to beat up on the cpu which becomes predictable, for 10 straight seasons? I think a lot of people just get frustrated because they don't win every game. When NFL2k5 came out and they had the fantastic online leagues (which EA now has what, 4 years later????), I joined up with a group of about 20 guys from all over the nation all around my age. We continued to play about 10 straight league seasons and it was the most fun I have ever had playing a game in my entire life. I think most madden players prefer to play offline. While I do think Madden is making a comeback and is on the right track, most of the people who don't want to play online have never had the right experience with it to really understand what makes it fun. The whole point of a sports game is to compete against the best competition and try to out smart your opponent. Human players need to adjust play calling, try different things, utilize different packages etc, etc. When playing the cpu, you get to win every time, what fun is that in the spirit of true competition? I have a group of friends who were all big 2k5 players and we are all actually somewhat hopeful that this year's madden will finally be remotely close to that "other game" that came out 4 years ago. The fact that we can compete against each other in a realistic sim style game is what makes the game fun. If you don't want to be cheesed, then stick to playing against a group of guys on your friend list.

                      Comment

                      • imbout
                        Rookie
                        • Nov 2004
                        • 27

                        #26
                        This is a great testimonial for all us gamers that really don't enjoy all the online stuff. I am in the same boat and I get chastised all the time for playing offline with my sports games. That is the way that I enjoy the game the most and I love it. Great post!!!
                        ediddy

                        NCAA Football 2008 PS2 Michigan
                        Madden 2008 PS2 Lions
                        MLB 08:The Show PS3 Cubs
                        College Hoops 2K8 PS3 Michigan
                        NBA 2K8 PS3 Pistons

                        Comment

                        • Smokez4DAyz
                          Banned
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 110

                          #27
                          I have a fondness for online gaming, I've been trying to game online since the dreamcast days. I hit my high point with socom 2, I played that game all day, all night, online. I now play all the Cod4, bad company, halo 3, gta 4 online and i love it/hate it and you've stated some my beefs. In these games, you can see how others are playing the game, and see tactics, so I don't mind online action games. Sports is a whole 'nother thing. I agree, I can't stand sports gamers that simplifies a four quarter game to two plays on defense and two plays on offense, for 45 minutes? and of course they must use the 'best' team. Its not uncommon to face the Pats six times in a row online, not exactly real, as there are many NFL fans, but very few have the cojones' to get online with their favorite team. So you have a bunch of copycats, not exactly what CPU a.i offers. In NBA online, I can't bring myself to play 2k online anymore, too many exploits, guys that don't use PGs, or you play houston and Yao and Mutombo in the game at the same time, or the guy that wants to post you up with Jason Kidd(?) for four quarters, its a mess. I have friends over all the time for gaming sessions and sometimes, I'd rather be alone with the CPU A.I, my friends suck, lol, so I don't enjoy it as much as they do, and when they leave, I fire up my season in whatever. Hey, I think online gaming is a step in the right direction, I just wish guys would download an integrity handbook.

                          Comment

                          • demencia_total
                            No Way
                            • Dec 2006
                            • 698

                            #28
                            I've always been at a crossroads when it comes to online. It can be fun playing with friends, but playing strangers results usually in the same tactics again and again, which is the nature of a lot of gamers as Carlos stated: winning at all cost. And when I say "friend", I mean people who you know in real life or at least come into communication often. The reason I make this distinction is that I've added people online who I've come in contact with but it always results in a futile attempt to start a proper game in games that have more than 1vs1. Everyone wants something different, then starts making their wishes known in a less than civil manner through the mic, and if their wishes aren't met, then they begin to annoy everyone in full force and/or leave the session. Again, It's just people being people, it's not like this doesn't happen in some other form in other facets of life.

                            I remember the days of playing games like Age of Empires on LAN with a bunch of people who were less than adept at strategy games because we weren't hardcore gamers at all, but that was one of the most enjoyable gaming experiences ever because even in our vast ignorance of pc's and such games that were deemed "too geeky", everyone was on the same page of having fun with whatever it was we were doing. After work, some would stay at the office to use the computers and the Dreamcast and we would just battle it out in Marvel vs Capcom 2, NBA 2k1, Rival Schools, etc.

                            After that experience, I relived it with Halo LAN parties even if I had no idea what I was doing and kept getting murdered over and over again. Eventually, I got pretty good at it and bought an Xbox and ventured into Halo 2 online, which cemented my feelings on online gaming. When I played with friends, it was awesome and even when you lost, you gained something from the experience. When I played against strangers, it felt like a routine where everyone would use the cheapest tactics while screaming incoherently through the microphone. It didn't matter if they were 12 or 24, it was the most immature crowd of gamers that made me really wary of competition online. I know this isn't the case for ALL games as I realize that example is coming from one of the most overrated - and probably most hyped - games in history, but the trend has continued through sports games and pc gaming, even if to a lesser degree.

                            In sports it's a little easier to find competitors that are willing to play a more "relaxed" style through sites like OS since it's mainly 1vs1, but now with the addition of 5vs5 in bball and 10vs10 in football, the same problems are going to arise. "YOO STUPID #*&$*&$ IM LABRON!" I can already hear them shouting in the lobby. If I could amass at least five friend gamers that were online pretty frequently I probably wouldn't be writing this, but being in my half 20's, most of my friends don't even own a console, much less ventured online. Most of us have partners to attend to, studies, jobs, some have kids, activities, etc.

                            Unless you're willing to venture into online socializing, it ain't gonna work for a lot of us. I think online works great for people who are willing to do this and for the younger ones who have all the time in the world and grew up with the newer generations of gaming, but I'll always remain wary of it.

                            Comment

                            • spursfan
                              Rookie
                              • May 2003
                              • 105

                              #29
                              I feel your pain. As much as I hate to say it most people will do anything to win. I nba 2k and madden online. Either they are way above your skill level or way below. There is no "unpredictibility". Most people, if they can't beat u sim, they will try to use every known glitch in the game to beat u. And if that doesn't work, they'll ask for a friendly quit, or just quit. Once they realize they can't cheese u, they quit or disconnect. Same thing for fight night. everyone just finds a way to abuse haymakers. For NBA 2k, everyone complained about the layups. But they were fine, as long u didn't run around dribbling the whole game, and actually ran plays. The only time it was fun for me consitiantly, was in my nba 2k leagues. Because u would play a guy multiple times, u both got a "feel" for each other. Anybody can win one game. But can u beat ur rival 2 and 3 times in a row, and on the road? This far more realstic and fun to me. Because u had to strategize what thast other player was gonna do. This is why I'm glad madden finally has online leaguse. Hopefully they fixed the game so if quit an online game, u should lose. I If I wanted to play the cpu, I'd be playing franchise mode..

                              Comment

                              Working...