Madden 09 Quick Patch #2 Update From EA -
Operation Sports Forums
The upgrade is complete, but you've probably noticed the forums are only showing posts up to about April 8. Posts made after that are still in the process of being moved over, and that should take another week or two. Feel free to start a new thread.
The site might feel a little slow while work continues. Engineers are staying on it through the night to get things moving faster again. Thanks for your patience.
I don't mean to take the thread off topic, but you are kidding right?
Not really..its been stated a zillion times by developers that Xenos is a better graphics processor then the RSX and Sony's CELL is only better then 360's triple core 3.2ghz 64bit cpu's in raw FLOPS and a few other things.. thats it.. there for as John Carmack himself stated..the 360 has a more powerful GPU..there for has more power (overall) in performance output for videogames .. simply put, the cpu's in both systems are about equal in realistic world performance (when developing to the metal) but the graphic's chip's..hands down 360 owns the ps3....pm ian, im sure he could vouch on that. Im not saying the 360 blows the ps3 out of the water..no thats not what im saying..im saying this myth that the ps3 is more powerful then the 360 simply isnt true..infact its the other way around, really, it is.
Now..do you want to debate some more? I will litter your email with plenty of proof..give me your email..we can debate elsewhere.
Look im no fanboy of any system.. but what erks the hell out of me is ignorant fanboys and i dont mean ignorant in a BAD WAY..but your another one of these sony fanboys that are fooled by your lack of knowledge of whats inside these consoles and by Sony's PR BS. The only thing the ps3 has over the 360 right now is one thing..its bluray drive and that dont do much for visuals and raw power.
Want to discuss this futher? my msn is Moegames@insightbb.com ..i'll be more then happy to give you a lesson in technology...so we will no loger spam this thread with off topic discussion.
Before we go any further..unless you rather not.. you may start doing some research here with one leading game developer here giving his take on the 360 hardware vs ps3 hardware..
Not really..its been stated a zillion times by developers that Xenos is a better graphics processor then the RSX and Sony's CELL is only better then 360's triple core 3.2ghz 64bit cpu's in raw FLOPS and a few other things.. thats it.. there for as John Carmack himself stated..the 360 has a more powerful GPU..there for has more power (overall) in performance output for videogames .. simply put, the cpu's in both systems are about equal in realistic world performance (when developing to the metal) but the graphic's chip's..hands down 360 owns the ps3....pm ian, im sure he could vouch on that. Im not saying the 360 blows the ps3 out of the water..no thats not what im saying..im saying this myth that the ps3 is more powerful then the 360 simply isnt true..infact its the other way around, really, it is.
Now..do you want to debate some more? I will litter your email with plenty of proof..give me your email..we can debate elsewhere.
Look im no fanboy of any system.. but what erks the hell out of me is ignorant fanboys and i dont mean ignorant in a BAD WAY..but your another one of these sony fanboys that are fooled by your lack of knowledge of whats inside these consoles and by Sony's PR BS. The only thing the ps3 has over the 360 right now is one thing..its bluray drive and that dont do much for visuals and raw power.
Want to discuss this futher? my msn is Moegames@insightbb.com ..i'll be more then happy to give you a lesson in technology...so we will no loger spam this thread with off topic discussion.
Before we go any further..unless you rather not.. you may start doing some research here with one leading game developer here giving his take on the 360 hardware vs ps3 hardware..
And if you still want to be hard headed..hit me up on msn..i got many more facts ..raw facts and spec sheets that will prove your wrong and im right.
Hell yeah my man! Us Viking fans have to let out our anger right now cuz the Vikes suck
Anyway I have no idea about that kind of hardware stuff but Moegames it looks to me like you know your stuff!
As for this debate yeah 360 might have its problems but I can tell you one thing. I don't see any difference in the picture between 360 and PS3 so graphically speaking I'm pretty sure they're the same. I own a 360 and have played my friends ps3 plenty of times and I can't tell a bit of a difference.
Not really..its been stated a zillion times by developers that Xenos is a better graphics processor then the RSX and Sony's CELL is only better then 360's triple core 3.2ghz 64bit cpu's in raw FLOPS and a few other things.. thats it.. there for as John Carmack himself stated..the 360 has a more powerful GPU..there for has more power (overall) in performance output for videogames .. simply put, the cpu's in both systems are about equal in realistic world performance (when developing to the metal) but the graphic's chip's..hands down 360 owns the ps3....pm ian, im sure he could vouch on that. Im not saying the 360 blows the ps3 out of the water..no thats not what im saying..im saying this myth that the ps3 is more powerful then the 360 simply isnt true..infact its the other way around, really, it is.
Now..do you want to debate some more? I will litter your email with plenty of proof..give me your email..we can debate elsewhere.
Look im no fanboy of any system.. but what erks the hell out of me is ignorant fanboys and i dont mean ignorant in a BAD WAY..but your another one of these sony fanboys that are fooled by your lack of knowledge of whats inside these consoles and by Sony's PR BS. The only thing the ps3 has over the 360 right now is one thing..its bluray drive and that dont do much for visuals and raw power.
Want to discuss this futher? my msn is Moegames@insightbb.com ..i'll be more then happy to give you a lesson in technology...so we will no loger spam this thread with off topic discussion.
Before we go any further..unless you rather not.. you may start doing some research here with one leading game developer here giving his take on the 360 hardware vs ps3 hardware..
Not really..its been stated a zillion times by developers that Xenos is a better graphics processor then the RSX and Sony's CELL is only better then 360's triple core 3.2ghz 64bit cpu's in raw FLOPS and a few other things.. thats it.. there for as John Carmack himself stated..the 360 has a more powerful GPU..there for has more power (overall) in performance output for videogames .. simply put, the cpu's in both systems are about equal in realistic world performance (when developing to the metal) but the graphic's chip's..hands down 360 owns the ps3....pm ian, im sure he could vouch on that. Im not saying the 360 blows the ps3 out of the water..no thats not what im saying..im saying this myth that the ps3 is more powerful then the 360 simply isnt true..infact its the other way around, really, it is.
Now..do you want to debate some more? I will litter your email with plenty of proof..give me your email..we can debate elsewhere.
Look im no fanboy of any system.. but what erks the hell out of me is ignorant fanboys and i dont mean ignorant in a BAD WAY..but your another one of these sony fanboys that are fooled by your lack of knowledge of whats inside these consoles and by Sony's PR BS. The only thing the ps3 has over the 360 right now is one thing..its bluray drive and that dont do much for visuals and raw power.
Want to discuss this futher? my msn is Moegames@insightbb.com ..i'll be more then happy to give you a lesson in technology...so we will no loger spam this thread with off topic discussion.
Before we go any further..unless you rather not.. you may start doing some research here with one leading game developer here giving his take on the 360 hardware vs ps3 hardware..
And if you still want to be hard headed..hit me up on msn..i got many more facts ..raw facts and spec sheets that will prove your wrong and im right.
lol...did you just call a guy "son" in an off-topic and, frankly, pointless debate? Wow. Not disputing your facts, but good lord. What do you get when you win...lol...must be good
I'm just having a little fun with you, but man, some of you guys seem to take this stuff way too seriously, IMO.
So we will be seeing this patch sometime within the next week correct? It has been 2 weeks since Ian announced the patch so im assuming everything is on schedule for the patch to drop soon.
So we will be seeing this patch sometime within the next week correct? It has been 2 weeks since Ian announced the patch so im assuming everything is on schedule for the patch to drop soon.
Holy ****, didn't realize it's been 2 weeks already!
Will the patch address the issues with some of the smart safety weapons not appearing nor working on and offline? Darren Sharper (Vikings), Kerry Rhodes (Jets) and Ed Reed (Ravens) smart safety weapon doesnt even appear during on and offline play. Let me know. Thanks.
Will the patch address the issues with some of the smart safety weapons not appearing nor working on and offline? Darren Sharper (Vikings), Kerry Rhodes (Jets) and Ed Reed (Ravens) smart safety weapon doesnt even appear during on and offline play. Let me know. Thanks.
Do you have your smart weapons turned on? Dumb question but I thought I would ask.
Not really..its been stated a zillion times by developers that Xenos is a better graphics processor then the RSX and Sony's CELL is only better then 360's triple core 3.2ghz 64bit cpu's in raw FLOPS and a few other things.. thats it.. there for as John Carmack himself stated..the 360 has a more powerful GPU..there for has more power (overall) in performance output for videogames .. simply put, the cpu's in both systems are about equal in realistic world performance (when developing to the metal) but the graphic's chip's..hands down 360 owns the ps3....pm ian, im sure he could vouch on that. Im not saying the 360 blows the ps3 out of the water..no thats not what im saying..im saying this myth that the ps3 is more powerful then the 360 simply isnt true..infact its the other way around, really, it is.
Now..do you want to debate some more? I will litter your email with plenty of proof..give me your email..we can debate elsewhere.
Look im no fanboy of any system.. but what erks the hell out of me is ignorant fanboys and i dont mean ignorant in a BAD WAY..but your another one of these sony fanboys that are fooled by your lack of knowledge of whats inside these consoles and by Sony's PR BS. The only thing the ps3 has over the 360 right now is one thing..its bluray drive and that dont do much for visuals and raw power.
Want to discuss this futher? my msn is Moegames@insightbb.com ..i'll be more then happy to give you a lesson in technology...so we will no loger spam this thread with off topic discussion.
Before we go any further..unless you rather not.. you may start doing some research here with one leading game developer here giving his take on the 360 hardware vs ps3 hardware..
Comment