Operation Sports Forums - View Single Post

prowler · 02-08-2009, 02:18 PM

Why not do do something similar to what they did on old gen and just name the coach after the school and allow us to rename them; UT HCoach = Lane Kiffin, UT DCoord = Monte Kiffin and so on.

I think this is what is desperately needed to add a spark to dynasty mode. As it is, people want to rebuild a one star team and it gets boring after only a few seasons because five star recruits are beating down their door.

What should happen is you have a good coach who makes a bad team respectable then takes off for a BCS conference, leaving you in rebuilding mode again. No matter how well a non BCS school does, they should not be able to recruit as well as a BCS team. For everything Utah did last year, they got one five star and one four star and they were both homegrown.

Instead it should be the coach's ability to ::gasp:: coach that makes two and three star recruits progress and play at a high level.

02-08-2009, 02:18 PM	#8
prowler MVP OVR: 11 Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Seattle, Wa	Re: NCAA Assistant Coaches Why not do do something similar to what they did on old gen and just name the coach after the school and allow us to rename them; UT HCoach = Lane Kiffin, UT DCoord = Monte Kiffin and so on. I think this is what is desperately needed to add a spark to dynasty mode. As it is, people want to rebuild a one star team and it gets boring after only a few seasons because five star recruits are beating down their door. What should happen is you have a good coach who makes a bad team respectable then takes off for a BCS conference, leaving you in rebuilding mode again. No matter how well a non BCS school does, they should not be able to recruit as well as a BCS team. For everything Utah did last year, they got one five star and one four star and they were both homegrown. Instead it should be the coach's ability to ::gasp:: coach that makes two and three star recruits progress and play at a high level.