If you're having problems logging in or staying logged in, please clear/delete your cookies/cache.
We are monitoring and fixing issues in this thread.
Thanks for your patience.
The upgrade is complete, but you've probably noticed the forums are only showing posts up to about April 8. Posts made after that are still in the process of being moved over, and that should take another week or two. Feel free to start a new thread.
The site might feel a little slow while work continues. Engineers are staying on it through the night to get things moving faster again. Thanks for your patience.
Been wanting to see this for a while because a lot of teams use the secondary color such as orange for the bears, orange for the dolphins, neon green for the seahawks.
Please take note that most of what I say and post is made in satire.
That's a helluva nice screenshot. Not only does the action on the field look sharp (cleats, OL/DL interaction, etc.), but that sideline over there is bangin'.
I think some of us are reading too much into this screen shot.
1. There is no evidence of interactive sidelines. However, I do see live coaches, and that's a huge plus.
This is actually in 09. I wasn't a fan of it because they look terrible, and they look like the same ones from last year. I still believe in the philosophy of less is more in many cases, and I'd rather have one really detailed recognizeable head coach than 3 terrible-looking ones that I can't even recognize.
Last year with 09 we had no Head Coaching presence, and I'd hate to see them make yet the same mistake two seasons in a row. I just have a bad feeling that there is going to be a repeat of that one.
Is it me, or does Sweed (#14) look really, really wide open? For that matter, I know they are only showing maybe 1/3 or 1/4 of the field (with an emphasis on the much-improved sidelines) but I don't see any other receivers. Perhaps this is a Hail Mary with a Prevent defense? I suppose that'd highlight the sidelines and O-line interaction without cluttering the view with too many players.
Comment