View Single Post
Old 04-05-2009, 04:48 PM   #54
rhombic21
Pro
 
rhombic21's Arena
 
OVR: 9
Join Date: Jul 2002
Re: IBM's "Deep Blue" computer beat the chess champ in '97,but we can't have adaptive

Quote:
Originally Posted by lint
You do have a point, but I term thinking as spontaneous and has the possibility of making a mistake. A computer can only do what you tell it to do. But I know what you mean.

The way it can be weighted is debatable. 1st and 10 at your own 35... what play should I run, if I have not played them before and there is no calculations yet. This seems like I would take the bill walsh approach and script my first 5 plays (this is actually done in chess as well, the first 5 moves are kind of random then it begins to start using the long algorithms.) then make your calculating moves after that.
One approach would be to create coach profiles. These profiles would then serve as a sort of "baseline" that would drive decisions when the AI lacks information about the user, and would alter the way that the computer interprets feedback/results.
rhombic21 is offline  
Reply With Quote