What kcarr said.
Now, I'm generally a little confused by progression influenced heavily by production, but I accept that that's the way it is. But I have a question for the guys who don't want players to decline with age if they have a great season.
Imagine I have a great 29 year old running back. Total stud. Presumably, he'll have a great year. So you guys would have him come back as good (even improved!) the next year. One would think he'd have another awesome year (because he's awesome), so no decline again. So when do these guys ever decline? It would seem 30 something running backs would dominate the league, not be some rare exception (I really think you guys overestimate how often a 30 something is any good-its like Curtis Martin for one year and that's it-for reals). It would break the whole system and be unrealistic, unless I'm misunderstanding your angle, which is quite possible because I am stupid.

Comment