[salbowski]

Quote: Originally Posted by kcarr

Those of us giving less names are really not that useless. We are trying to make our case that 50 is still too many. As donny said, nothing is set in stone yet, so if we can reduce that number by even a little then great.

Don't twist my words?!?!?

I didn't say you were useless i said naming less than 50 is useless...

Quote: Originally Posted by salbowski

So the people giving 17 or 33 names is useless cos there will be 50, so come up with 50... quite simple really.

Sorry if i offended you but it's quite clear that wasn't my intention.

I think 50 is about right for 95+...

15ish (too lazy to actually count) positions
3 All pro players in each position (on average)

=45 + variance

= 50.

........