NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
I love the updates to recruiting. As fun as it was to take a team like Duke and pull recruits in by year 2 it will be much more rewarding having a more difficult time. I also am a big fan of less 80+ recruits so that I am not always starting freshmen and sophomores by years 2 and 3.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
I hope that the speed raising isn't overdone anyways.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
I post something simliar to this over at Utopia too, to try to get an answer.
What about SEC conference scheduling. It was just as screwed up if not worse than the conferences he mention. NCAA 09 had Florida playing Ole Miss every year. Cmon man.
Florida plays these teams every year:
Tennessee
Georgia
Kentucky
South Carolina
Vanderbilt
LSU (the one west team we play every year)
Then rotate doing home and aways with the other 2 conference schedule spots with the other SEC West teams.
The whole SEC is this way. And I remember Ohio State always play @ Wisconsin in last years game too. He didnt mention the Big 10 either.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
I would like to think that there is no way a player could go from 78 speed to 98 speed. Hopefully it will be more around 3-7 speed points based off of stats IE YPC, YPR, etc.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
...As players adjust to college and improve their "game speed".Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
I'm glad recruits will not come in as 80+ as often, which means you will not be starting new recruits by season 2 of a dynasty. But I think we are missing something important:
On the downside, rosters are so small in this game that many teams have no depth on their rosters. For example, I find that many teams have so few OL on the roster that by time your seniors graduate after year 1 you have to start a true FR the next year. Without larger rosters, we will be forced to start bad players in year 2 because EA did not include enough depth in the original roster.EA: Please add in-game saves.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
I hope it isn't based on stats and based more upon the prestige of the school and the players potential. Stat based progression needs to stick to MMO's.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
I like the idea of recruit ratings being scaled down but if you do this I hope you also scale down player ratings like Madden has done this year. I no longer want to see the third best safety on Florida who has done nothing in college rated in the high 80s.
Keep up the good work.
Also, I would like to mention that I am not a fan of the season showdown mode. This does not seem to appeal at all to the hardcore gamer and sounds more like a tradition fluff feature. Maybe there is more to it than I have heard so far but as of now I would rather have improvements to presentation and gameplay.
Just my 2 cents.Comment
-
Re: NCAA Football 10 Blog: Dynasty Details
1. 99 (Darius Miles)
2. 98
3. 97
4. 97
5. 97
6. 97
7. 96
8. 96
9. 96
10. 96Comment
Comment