Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

[stevedrumsdw]

Just wondering before I spend hours editing.

[Hooe]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

I'm pretty sure the answer is no, as several (if not all, haven't looked at every last team though) teams are missing their freshmen classes.

[CKW11]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

There is a pretty split decision on whether or not these are or arent the final rosters. I'm not really sure, but i know i hope they're not. I'm really wish one of the devs would step in say if they are or if they arent.

[Solidice]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

doubt it, the roster templates on TeamBuilder looks like a '09 base roster with some changes here and there. some teams still have seniors that already graduated or players that left 2 years ago.

[UtahUtes32]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

whatever you edited is a "created team" and you will have to download it. That was not the "rosters" available to download when the game comes out, so whatever team/teams you did edit, you will have to download them and they are "created teams". on the plus side i made Utah 2004. GO UTES!

[da ThRONe]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

doubt it, the roster templates on TeamBuilder looks like a '09 base roster with some changes here and there. some teams still have seniors that already graduated or players that left 2 years ago.

Ok if the players left two years ago why are they still on the 09 template?

[CKW11]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

doubt it, the roster templates on TeamBuilder looks like a '09 base roster with some changes here and there. some teams still have seniors that already graduated or players that left 2 years ago.

And why are some teams the way they should be. I mean FSU's roster looks fine, minus the outragous ratings of course.

[Brandwin]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

Pasta just posted this on twitter.

pastapadreFyi: I was told the ncaa football 10 rosters on teambuilder are final.

[yanks26ngoin]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

OMT, you better bring up all these mistakes to the roster guy and have him fix it before the game ships.

[ramrod580]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

And why are some teams the way they should be. I mean FSU's roster looks fine, minus the outragous ratings of course.

Ohio State is almost perfect as well. Player wise.

[Solidice]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

Ok if the players left two years ago why are they still on the 09 template?

thats the problem, they shouldn't be there.

[Herky]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

Please don't be true.

[Roggie]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

NC State is missing some players.

While I see some teams being done, others seem off.

[Hooe]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

Ohio State is almost perfect as well. Player wise.

The roster isn't fine as a whole, however; several teams are missing their entire freshmen class. To make a specific complaint, my Virginia Cavaliers, on top of having no freshmen, are missing both our starting and backup quarterbacks (Jameel Sewell isn't in the game at all; Vic Hall is still incorrectly listed at cornerback, though he will also play nickel back for us this year).

I'll echo what I said in the other thread: I still am expecting NCAA 10 to have reasonably up-to-date rosters for all 120 teams for the upcoming season, because I expect at least that much from yearly sports titles.

[ramrod580]

Re: Are the rosters on teambuilder the ones being launched with the game?

The roster isn't fine as a whole, however; several teams are missing their entire freshmen class. To make a specific complaint, my Virginia Cavaliers, on top of having no freshmen, are missing both our starting and backup quarterbacks (Jameel Sewell isn't in the game at all; Vic Hall is still incorrectly listed at cornerback, though he will also play nickel back for us this year).

I'll echo what I said in the other thread: I still am expecting NCAA 10 to have reasonably up-to-date rosters for all 120 teams for the upcoming season, because I expect at least that much from yearly sports titles.

I hope you didn't take my comment the wrong way. I completely agree the rosters are total crap.

It just suprises me how accurate Ohio State is and how bad others are. It just seems weird.