NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

[sportzbro]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

Thanks for posting the screens Steve. The only thing that I didn't like about the dynasty presentation is it looks like the pictures that were part of the newspaper/ESPN articles have been replaced by the team logos. It appears that the pictures that were used last year are now part of the background, which is cool, but I thought that the school specific pictures actually being part of the article gave it a little touch of realism. If they were going to take the pictures away I wish they would have replaced them with in-game pictures.

They wont actually add anything to beef up presentation & replayability, but they'll switch around things that were already there.

[Bigdmo9999]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

They wont actually add anything to beef up presentation & replayability, but they'll switch around things that were already there.

I'm sick of your negativity towards this game. They finally gave us season showdown and all you do is complain about unimportant stuff like presentation and gameplay. Just be happy they actually spent time to give us mascot games, we've wanted those for a while. And like I said the best feature this year, season showdown.

[Dc0KE]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

I cannot believe this FSU stuff. Are you kidding me?

Seriously if I ever met Haumiller, I would kick his ***.

What a joke.

[stevedrumsdw]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

With the exception of minor tweaks to recruiting & polls, and the newish look.. this mode looks nearly untouched.

Yeah nothing has really changed at all. And nothing appears upgraded with the weekly lame magazine.

[ty5oke]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

Nothing new enough in the Dynasty department to warrant a purchase yet for me. I'll still have to check out the gameplay and see if there's an improvement there before I spend the money.

Tebow had a nice year 49TD's and 2 INT, but no Heisman.

[eritraj]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

I cannot believe this FSU stuff. Are you kidding me?

Seriously if I ever met Haumiller, I would kick his ***.

What a joke.

Agreed...

[stevedrumsdw]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

Seriously was FSU's roster edited by a 10 year old?


FSU- academic prestige (B+)

Ranked 102 nd by newsweek in the 2009 university rankings.

[Sportsbuck]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

QBs are still too accurate and stats are too high.

Percentages in order

76.8%
68%
69.7%
68.5%
70.7%
65.6%
56.3%

I wish we could see what schools these QB's played for, then it might clear things up considering offensive styles, talent of QB, etc.

[sportzbro]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

Seriously was FSU's roster edited by a 10 year?


FSU- academic prestige (B+)

Ranked 102 nd by newsweek in the 2009 university rankings.

More proof why actual football followers should be working on certain aspects of the game.

[mmorg]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

QBs are still too accurate and stats are too high.

Percentages in order

76.8%
68%
69.7%
68.5%
70.7%
65.6%
56.3%

That look's pretty good actually. Looking at last years CMP% leaders we have this.

Colt McCoy 76.7%
Chase Daniel 72.9%
Graham Harrell 70.6%
Kellen Moore 69.4%
Max Hall 69%
Brian Johnson 68%
Sam Bradford 67.9%

The top 47 QB's in NCAA Div-I Football last year were 60%+. If anything completion percentages are too low.

[Kentucky3D]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

The stats look almost perfect which is a nice surprise.

The only stat problem I noticed is there are way too many TFLs for the LBs and especially Defensive Linemen. Most guys seemed to be in the mid 20s with one guy at 30, which would never happen in D1-A football. The most TFL someone should be able to get is in the low 20s (Zach Follet of Cal led the nation with 23 TFLs last season, but there were only a handful of players in the 20s) and even that should be rare.

I had a question though Steve, were teams signing enough recruits? Also were there plenty of Centers and MLBs this year?

Anyway thanks for all the pictures, it took me 30 minutes to look at all of them.

[picowyatt]

I like most of the stuff I saw but I wonder this every year. Why does EA RANK teams different than they RATE them!? If FSU is a 94 they should be ranked in the top 10 not #20!! Either they're the 20th best team in the game then rate them accordingly. Conversely if they're really a 94 then rank the #6 or whatever it would be. It seems like they want to rate all their players good (which rates the team) but they now the team really isn't that good so they rank them weak. THAT'S WEAK! Come on EA! You want a real game then you can't personalize it.

[Tuxedo9000]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

Am I the only one who noticed that #1 Florida was playing #4 Penn State in the national championship? 2 spots is a pretty big leap over teams. I wonder what those polls looked like. Looks like SOS might be massive.

Edit: It could be that was after the sim. Not sure.

[picowyatt]

I might be wrong but I think those rankings were after the game. I think that's what the final polls ended up as anyway

[Tovarich]

Re: NCAA Football 10 Screenshots: Dynasty

In 2001, Miami played #4 Nebraska. Not unprecedented.

There was also that year #1 didnt even make the title game and 2 played 3...