Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders - Operation Sports Forums

Recommended Videos

Collapse

Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gooma
    Rookie
    • May 2008
    • 93

    #1

    Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

    Hey football fans big cpu vs. cpu fan here. I have found what i think are some good cpu vs cpu sliders so i wanted to share them.

    The sliders are basically EvanRG's sliders that were derived from Holycrap's sliders i just changed them a tad so all credit goes to them.

    Game Options: 15 Minutes
    25 Sec. Accelerated clock runoff

    Camera Settings: Whatever you want
    Injuries: 0 (As everyone knows now there are none in spectator mode)
    Fatigue: 100
    Game Speed: Very Slow
    Speed Threshold: 0
    Penalties:Whatever works for you(I use everything at 100 except holding: 50, facemask: 70, clipping: 70)
    Player Skill: Rookie (I don't think it does anything)
    CPU Skill:

    Passing:

    QB Acc-50
    Pass Block-15
    WR Catch-40

    Rushing:

    Broken Tackle-10
    Run Blk-65
    Fumbles-30

    Pass Def:

    Reaction Time-80
    Interceptions-0
    Pass Rush-45

    Rush Def:

    Reaction Time-50
    Block Shedding-45
    Tackling-70

    Special teams:Whatever you like (I haven't got mine set perfectly yet)


    Here is a stat rundown of the game i just finished ,probably one of the highest scoring crazy games i have had.

    CPU vs CPU



    Buccaneers:36 - Jaguars:39



    Buccaneers Passing:
    B. Leftwich: 22 of 42 for 284yds / 3TD / 2 Int / 52% comp / 77.8 QB Rating

    Jaguars Passing:
    D. Garrard: 30 of 38 for 322yds / 1TD / 1 Int / 78% comp / 99.8 QB Rating
    __________________________________________________
    Buccaneers Rushing:
    D. Ward: 16 for 71yds / 1TD / 4.4 avg / 5 Brk Tak / 21 Yd Long

    E. Graham:4 for 10yds / 2.5 avg / 6 Yd Long

    Jaguars Rushing:
    M. Jones-Drew: 22 for 140yds / 2TD / 6.3avg / 5 Brk Tak / 74 Yd Long

    C. Washington: 4 for 16yds / 1TD / 4.0avg / 1 Brk Tak / 6 Yd Long

    A. Pearman: 2 for 5yds / 2.5avg / 5 Yd Long

    D. Garrard: 2 for 1yds / 0.5 avg / 3 Yd Long / 1 Fumble
    __________________________________________________
    Buccaneers Receiving: (Top 4 Receivers)M. Stovall: 4 for 88yds / 1TD

    K. Winslow: 4 for 67yds / 2TD

    D. Ward: 4 for 34yds

    A. Bryant: 4 for 35yds

    (1 Drop Overall)

    Jaguars Receiving: (Top 4 Receivers)M. Walker: 9 for 77yds / 1TD / 1 Drop

    M. Jones-Drew: 5 for 43yds

    G. Jones: 4 for 57yds

    M. Lewis: 4 for 35yds

    (2 Drops Overall)

    __________________________________________________ _
    Buccaneers Deffense:
    A. Crowell: 7 Tak-1 Assist

    G. Adams: 6 Tak

    T. Cox: 5 Tak-3 Assist

    T. Jackson: 3 Tak-2 Assist / 1 INT

    (1 Sack Overall)

    Jaguars Deffense:
    R. Nelson: 5 Tak-3 Assist / 1 INT

    B. Williams: 1 Tak-2 Assist / 1 INT

    __________________________________________________ _
    Other Random Stats:


    4 Pancakes (Both teams)
    15 Tackles for loss (Both teams)
    10 Pass Deflections (Both teams)
    3 Forced Fumbles (Both teams there was also another 2 i think that were overturned)
    J. Stevens returned a kickoff return fumble for a TD
    B. Witherspoon returned a kickoff for a 93 YD TD

    Total of 131 plays in the game

    Tampa Bay had 6 Penalties
    Jacksonville had 7 Penalties
    2 Point conversions: Tampa Bay was 1 from 1
    Jacksonville was 0 from 2

    __________________________________________________ _

    Give them a try if u like and post back any changes u think necessary.
    Last edited by gooma; 08-22-2009, 03:50 AM.
  • joejccva71
    Banned
    • Mar 2008
    • 1544

    #2
    Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

    Ok bro I'll give these a shot and see how it goes. I'm playing with the Vikings. Will post game stats when I'm done.

    Comment

    • Altohombre
      Rookie
      • Nov 2004
      • 241

      #3
      Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

      looking forward to more game results

      Comment

      • joejccva71
        Banned
        • Mar 2008
        • 1544

        #4
        Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

        Gooma real fast...you have fatigue set to 100 in your sliders. What are your auto sub ins/outs set at?

        Comment

        • joejccva71
          Banned
          • Mar 2008
          • 1544

          #5
          Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

          Ok finished 1st regular season game with the Vikings. I played against the Browns and here are the stats with Gooma's sliders:

          Final Score
          Vikings - 43
          Browns - 28


          Vikings Passing
          B.Favre: 16/27, 223yds, 2 TD, 1 INT, 59% comp

          Browns Passing
          B.Quinn: 21/48, 314yds, 1 TD, 4 INT, 43% comp

          _________________________________________

          Vikings Rushing
          A.Peterson: 30att, 209yds, 2 TD, 6.9 avg ypc
          C.Taylor: 8att, 21yds, 1 TD, 2.6 avg ypc

          Browns Rushing
          J.Lewis: 16att, 138yds, 2 TD, 8.6 avg ypc

          _________________________________________

          Vikings Defense - *Notables*E.Henderson: 6 tackles
          M.Williams: 6 tackles
          P.Williams: 4 tackles, 2 sacks

          4 INT's - A.Winfield(1), K.Paymah(1), R.Edwards(1), C.Griffin(1)

          Browns Defense - *Notables*
          S.Rogers: 7 tackles
          B.McDonald: 5 tackles
          B.Pool: 5 tackles, 1 INT


          Overall the game played good but when Quinn threw his second interception, I made a bet with my friend saying "I'll bet you he makes atleast 1 more before the game is over." And yes I won $5 from my friend.

          Now I realize this is the Browns and Brady Quinn isn't that great atleast according to EA, but I hate the back to back interceptions.

          So what do you think? Oh btw, the play count for 15 min quaters with 25 sec runoff for this game was 132 plays. Seems a little high.
          Last edited by joejccva71; 08-23-2009, 12:33 AM.

          Comment

          • joejccva71
            Banned
            • Mar 2008
            • 1544

            #6
            Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

            Sigh. Gimme a break. Seriously??!!?! Check this out from Week 2 against the Lions:

            Final Score
            Lions - 45
            Vikings (me) - 38


            Vikings Passing
            B.Favre: 24/41, 337yds, 2 TD, 2 INT

            Lions Passing
            M.Stafford: 20/33, 422yds, 5 TD, 2 INT

            _________________________________

            Vikings Rushing
            A.Peterson: 18att, 75yds, 1 TD
            C.Taylor: 11att, 24yds, 1 TD

            Lions Rushing
            K.Smith: 19att, 43yds

            _________________________________

            Vikings Defense
            Sacks: 1
            INTs: 2

            Lions Defense
            Sacks: 2
            INTs: 2

            Apparently Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson couldn't miss.

            Stafford threw 3 TD passes to him. Wanna guess what Calvin Johnson's stats were?

            C.Johnson: 4rec, 181yds, 3 TD

            You still going to tell me that this game isn't broke guys? Or does my Vikings defense just suck that bad with Winfield, both Williams at DT, Jared Allen at DE, and Henderson at MLB. Right?

            Please convince me otherwise. Stafford threw the ball like Peyton Manning.

            Comment

            • gooma
              Rookie
              • May 2008
              • 93

              #7
              Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

              Interceptions happen thats part of madden 10. Also wats the most interceptions in a game by a QB that would be 6 by none other than peyton manning. Until we get a patch thats the best u can do. Ive had games were there only been 1 interception or even just 1 each QB. Ive played something like 30 games with these . Even with sacks ive seen games with 1 and ive seen games with 5-6.

              As for auto sub sliders the one i use are:
              out/in
              qb- 50/75
              rb- 68/69
              wr- 67/68
              fb/te- 60/65
              ol- 45/65

              dt- 69/70
              de- 68/69
              lb- 50/70
              cb- 45/65
              s- 60/65


              Ive tested all the cpu vs. cpu sliders and even some human vs cpu sliders and these are deffinetly the best i have seen.

              Comment

              • joejccva71
                Banned
                • Mar 2008
                • 1544

                #8
                Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

                Originally posted by gooma
                Interceptions happen thats part of madden 10. Also wats the most interceptions in a game by a QB that would be 6 by none other than peyton manning. Until we get a patch thats the best u can do. Ive had games were there only been 1 interception or even just 1 each QB. Ive played something like 30 games with these . Even with sacks ive seen games with 1 and ive seen games with 5-6.

                As for auto sub sliders the one i use are:
                out/in
                qb- 50/75
                rb- 68/69
                wr- 67/68
                fb/te- 60/65
                ol- 45/65

                dt- 69/70
                de- 68/69
                lb- 50/70
                cb- 45/65
                s- 60/65


                Ive tested all the cpu vs. cpu sliders and even some human vs cpu sliders and these are deffinetly the best i have seen.
                One more question bro. Are you sure about using 0 speed threshhold? I've been using 25...is that a bad idea?

                Comment

                • Football4Natic
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 747

                  #9
                  Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

                  how can you say you played vs a team when this is cpu vs cpu....

                  Comment

                  • joejccva71
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 1544

                    #10
                    Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

                    Originally posted by Football4Natic
                    how can you say you played vs a team when this is cpu vs cpu....
                    Well I mean that I'm using the vikings in my franchise lol. But yes I do the CPU/CPU in the game.

                    Comment

                    • gooma
                      Rookie
                      • May 2008
                      • 93

                      #11
                      Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

                      I was also gonna say just cause stafford is a rookie doesnt meen he wont have an awesome game like that and maybe the vikes D sucked for a game that happens its football cant be great every game.

                      As for your question i use zero because it feels more realistic, if say a wr is faster then a db hes gonna out run him, the higher u put the threshold the more likely that db has a chance to catch him or atleast thats how i think this threshold thing works. So for me zero just feels right but u play some games and let me know wat u think of the difference between 0 and 25.

                      These sliders here are the absolute best ive found. Ive been testing since release day and unless theres something major ive misssed i think this is the best we can do until somekind of patch comes out that fixes interceptions and injuries and so on.

                      On a little not i just read youre post about brady quinn and how u bet ur friend 5 bucks or watever. ive watched one weird game were there was only 1 interception all game then the titans D started putting alot of pressure on roethlisberger and he threw 2 bad passes that cortland finnegan picked off. I think it may have something to do with some kind of CPU comeback thing also nothing we can do about that as far as i know.

                      Also with the play count thing all the games ive played the total is usually somewere between 120 and 135 it kinda depends on how often the clock is stopped how many penalties there are and just over all how the game plays out and wat strategies the teams play whether they play alot more on the passing side of things or run it more.
                      Last edited by gooma; 08-23-2009, 02:32 AM.

                      Comment

                      • joejccva71
                        Banned
                        • Mar 2008
                        • 1544

                        #12
                        Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

                        Originally posted by gooma
                        I was also gonna say just cause stafford is a rookie doesnt meen he wont have an awesome game like that and maybe the vikes D sucked for a game that happens its football cant be great every game.

                        As for your question i use zero because it feels more realistic, if say a wr is faster then a db hes gonna out run him, the higher u put the threshold the more likely that db has a chance to catch him or atleast thats how i think this threshold thing works. So for me zero just feels right but u play some games and let me know wat u think of the difference between 0 and 25.

                        These sliders here are the absolute best ive found. Ive been testing since release day and unless theres something major ive misssed i think this is the best we can do until somekind of patch comes out that fixes interceptions and injuries and so on.

                        On a little not i just read youre post about brady quinn and how u bet ur friend 5 bucks or watever. ive watched one weird game were there was only 1 interception all game then the titans D started putting alot of pressure on roethlisberger and he threw 2 bad passes that cortland finnegan picked off. I think it may have something to do with some kind of CPU comeback thing also nothing we can do about that as far as i know.
                        Yea hehe. Stafford was on fire bro...was nuts. Anyways one more question.

                        What do your have your coaching philosophy set for running backs? Especially the one where it says "Carries" and then has the slider for how much you want to split carries between RB1 and RB2?

                        Thanks.

                        Comment

                        • gooma
                          Rookie
                          • May 2008
                          • 93

                          #13
                          Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

                          Honestly i havent touched that cause i havent done to much in franchise mode ive played some preseason games but i do most my testing in play now mode. Generally speaking if its a 2 back system like carolina and tennesse id put it at about 60-70 for rb1 and then u got teams like um minnesota were i would put it to about 90 or so for rb1.

                          Comment

                          • joejccva71
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 1544

                            #14
                            Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

                            Originally posted by gooma
                            Honestly i havent touched that cause i havent done to much in franchise mode ive played some preseason games but i do most my testing in play now mode. Generally speaking if its a 2 back system like carolina and tennesse id put it at about 60-70 for rb1 and then u got teams like um minnesota were i would put it to about 90 or so for rb1.
                            Can you play a few franchise mode games just to make sure I'm not crazy? Whenever you have time.

                            Comment

                            • gooma
                              Rookie
                              • May 2008
                              • 93

                              #15
                              Re: Gooma's CPU Vs. CPU Sliders

                              Its only 5 pm here so i dont see why i cant, give me alittle time we will see wat happens.

                              Comment

                              Working...